Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Evaluation of Iphone Technology in Diabetes Treatment

3 de dezembro de 2014 atualizado por: Dr. Hugh Tildesley, Endocrine Research Society

Background

With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).

Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to encourage patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).

Purpose and Rationale

Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.

Objectives

Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.

Primary Outcomes Include:

  1. Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
  2. Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
  3. Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
  4. Time taken to teach each patient the platforms

Research Design/Methods

Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:

BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.

IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.

Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Visão geral do estudo

Descrição detalhada

Background/Hypothesis

Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (oral agents or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet.

With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).

Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).

Purpose and Rationale

Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.

Objectives

Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.

Primary Outcomes Include:

  1. Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
  2. Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
  3. Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
  4. Time taken to teach each patient the platforms

Research Design/Methods

Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:

BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.

IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.

Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Confidentiality According to the guidelines of the University of British Columbia (UBC)/Providence Health Care Research Ethics Boards, the identity of participants will be kept confidential.

Data for each patient will be collected from the Clinical Research Coordinator and the Internet based glucose monitoring system. These data will only be accessed by the investigators and will be inputted into an Excel® spreadsheet where each patient will be given a unique identifier. All data pertaining to individual patients will be kept locked in the office of the study investigators.

Calculations and Statistics Statistical analysis will be performed on site by the researchers. Each group will complete the DTSQ. Questions revolve around satisfaction of treatment and are to be answered on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very Satisfied). Frequency of reporting will be determined through number of reports sent in per month. Total strip count will be recorded for each group. Time will be measured for the time it takes to train each patient in their respective meter/platform. All outcome measurements will be analysed using independent samples t-tests. Participants will only be identified by coded initials and a number to protect privacy.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Real)

43

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Locais de estudo

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canadá, V6E1M7
        • Endocrine Research Society

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

18 anos a 80 anos (Adulto, Adulto mais velho)

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo

Tudo

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Comparador Ativo: BG Star (Conventional Meter)
25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
Patients in BG Star Meter Group will report using BG software through uploading information onto a computer and sending readings to their endocrinologist via email
Comparador Ativo: IBG Star Group (iPhone)
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Satisfação do paciente
Prazo: 6 meses
6 meses
Frequency of SMBG testing
Prazo: 6 months
6 months
Frequency of Reporting
Prazo: 6 months
How often patient sends report in to endocrinologist
6 months
Time required to teach meter/internet platform
Prazo: Measured at beginning of study
Measured at beginning of study

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Publicações e links úteis

A pessoa responsável por inserir informações sobre o estudo fornece voluntariamente essas publicações. Estes podem ser sobre qualquer coisa relacionada ao estudo.

Links úteis

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo

1 de abril de 2013

Conclusão Primária (Real)

1 de dezembro de 2013

Conclusão do estudo (Real)

1 de dezembro de 2013

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

21 de março de 2013

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

21 de março de 2013

Primeira postagem (Estimativa)

25 de março de 2013

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Estimativa)

5 de dezembro de 2014

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

3 de dezembro de 2014

Última verificação

1 de dezembro de 2014

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever