Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Evaluation of Iphone Technology in Diabetes Treatment

3 décembre 2014 mis à jour par: Dr. Hugh Tildesley, Endocrine Research Society

Background

With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).

Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to encourage patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).

Purpose and Rationale

Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.

Objectives

Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.

Primary Outcomes Include:

  1. Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
  2. Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
  3. Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
  4. Time taken to teach each patient the platforms

Research Design/Methods

Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:

BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.

IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.

Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Background/Hypothesis

Management of diabetes is an evolving challenge to health care professionals. The fluctuations of glucose levels over the lifetime of patients with diabetes can lead to complications such as nephropathy, neuropathy, retinopathy and cardiovascular diseases. Although diabetes is a chronic disease, it can be controlled with use of medications (oral agents or insulin), and/or changes in life-style and diet.

With the emergence of the internet, health care professionals are changing the way they approach diabetes management. Internet Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (IBGMS) are aimed at keeping blood glucose levels normal or in the range of acceptable levels to prevent the complications associated with diabetes. The Principal Investigators have completed a randomized clinical trial supporting the efficacy of IBGMS (1,2).

Patient satisfaction of reporting platform is essential to patient reporting and participation in IBGMS. In this study, we wish to compare two different types of meters which will be used to internet blood glucose monitoring: the BG Star Meter (Conventional Meter), and the iBG Star Group (iPhone Technology).

Purpose and Rationale

Patients who are more satisfied with their meter and internet reporting platform are more likely to participate in an internet monitoring system. Patients often lack the motivation to report to their endocrinologist. With increased reporting to their healthcare professional, patients are more likely to benefit from such a system. This study aims to compare two types of meters and their respective internet reporting platforms to encourage patient participation.

Objectives

Our main goal is to compare the two types of meters.

Primary Outcomes Include:

  1. Patient Satisfaction as measured by the "Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire" (DTSQ)
  2. Frequency of reporting to endocrinologist
  3. Number of Self-Monitoring Blood Glucose (SMBG) tests
  4. Time taken to teach each patient the platforms

Research Design/Methods

Sample Size: 50 patients will be randomized into two groups:

BG Star Group (Conventional Meter) 25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.

IBG Star Group (iPhone Technology) 25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Patients will be recruited from a Physician's private office.

Both the (Conventional meter) BG star and iBG star (iPhone Technology) group will be asked to perform SMBG 3 or more times per day and to upload their metered glucose values online every 2 weeks to be reviewed by the doctor.

Inclusion criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion criteria: Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Confidentiality According to the guidelines of the University of British Columbia (UBC)/Providence Health Care Research Ethics Boards, the identity of participants will be kept confidential.

Data for each patient will be collected from the Clinical Research Coordinator and the Internet based glucose monitoring system. These data will only be accessed by the investigators and will be inputted into an Excel® spreadsheet where each patient will be given a unique identifier. All data pertaining to individual patients will be kept locked in the office of the study investigators.

Calculations and Statistics Statistical analysis will be performed on site by the researchers. Each group will complete the DTSQ. Questions revolve around satisfaction of treatment and are to be answered on a scale of 1 (very dissatisfied) to 6 (very Satisfied). Frequency of reporting will be determined through number of reports sent in per month. Total strip count will be recorded for each group. Time will be measured for the time it takes to train each patient in their respective meter/platform. All outcome measurements will be analysed using independent samples t-tests. Participants will only be identified by coded initials and a number to protect privacy.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

43

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6E1M7
        • Endocrine Research Society

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

18 ans à 80 ans (Adulte, Adulte plus âgé)

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

Sexes éligibles pour l'étude

Tout

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Type 1s
  • Type 2s, can be on insulin, oral antihyperglycemic agents, or in combination.
  • Willingness to test blood glucose levels a minimum of 3 times daily
  • Willingness to be randomized
  • Trained in self-blood glucose monitoring
  • Internet Access

Exclusion Criteria:

Patients who do not meet the above criteria or are not willing to participate will not be included in the study.

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Soins de soutien
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Comparateur actif: BG Star (Conventional Meter)
25 patients will use the (conventional) BG star meter in which patients will upload their readings onto a computer and send in their readings via email.
Patients in BG Star Meter Group will report using BG software through uploading information onto a computer and sending readings to their endocrinologist via email
Comparateur actif: IBG Star Group (iPhone)
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.
25 patients will be randomized to the iBGstar system will upload their readings to their iPhone and send in their readings using the iPhone.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Satisfaction des patients
Délai: 6 mois
6 mois
Frequency of SMBG testing
Délai: 6 months
6 months
Frequency of Reporting
Délai: 6 months
How often patient sends report in to endocrinologist
6 months
Time required to teach meter/internet platform
Délai: Measured at beginning of study
Measured at beginning of study

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Publications et liens utiles

La personne responsable de la saisie des informations sur l'étude fournit volontairement ces publications. Il peut s'agir de tout ce qui concerne l'étude.

Liens utiles

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude

1 avril 2013

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 décembre 2013

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 décembre 2013

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

21 mars 2013

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

21 mars 2013

Première publication (Estimation)

25 mars 2013

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Estimation)

5 décembre 2014

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

3 décembre 2014

Dernière vérification

1 décembre 2014

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner