此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Inhaled Hypertonic Saline Use in the Emergency Department to Treat Acute Viral Bronchiolitis

2015年1月5日 更新者:Mateus Deckers Leme、University of Sao Paulo

Study of the Effect of Inhaled 3% Hypertonic Saline Compared With Normal Saline (0,9%) for the Treatment of Acute Viral Bronchiolitis in a Short Stay Ward

Acute viral bronchiolitis is an extremely common childhood disease, responsible for approximately 17% of childhood admissions to hospital per year, with an annually cost that reaches U$ 500 million.

Despite being a well known disease among pediatricians, there are few, if any, effective treatment options apart from oxygen supplementation and adequate hydration.

The purpose of this study is to determine wether nebulized hypertonic saline (3%) is more effective than normal saline (0,9%) when used in repeated doses during the first 24 hours of in-hospital treatment.

研究概览

详细说明

Acute viral bronchiolitis is a lower airway infection, caused manly by Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Near 1% of children up to 2 years of age get it with sufficient severity to warrant hospital admission, with an annual cost of about U$ 500 million in the US, superior, for instance, than cystic fibrosis annual cost.

Despite the physiopathology and clinical course being well known among pediatricians, few therapeutical options other than adequate hydration and oxygen supplementation have proven to be effective Corticosteroids are not effective and bronchodilators are controversial, and treatment is still mostly empiric and lacking evidence.

In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in the use of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) as a promising approach. The rational is that HS would help reducing edema and mucus viscosity, enhancing its rheologic properties. Recent studies suggest that HS could reduce up to 1 day (25%) of time until discharge in admitted patients. In the Emergency Department, HS was not superior to other forms of treatment, but these studies lack power and similarities to draw further conclusions. Also, time of treatment and ideal interval between doses are not known as yet.

To our knowledge, few if any studies have assessed patients with an intermediary (up to 24h) time of stay, namely a short stay ward attached to an emergency department. Thus, we have endeavoured to determine if repeated doses of nebulized HS are superior to nebulized normal saline (NS) during the first 24 hour of treatment, when considered: rate of admission, time until discharge, time until attain discharge criteria, and rate of readmission after discharge.

Furthermore, most studies use HS associated to a bronchodilator, because of a theoretical possibility that HS alone could induce bronchoconstriction and worsen respiratory symptoms. However, recent studies have shown that HS use without bronchodilators have not caused any worsening of symptoms in bronchiolitis patients. Therefore, we propose to study the effect of HS alone, without the adding of bronchodilators, which would minimize bias in the treatment group.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

32

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • SP
      • Sao Paulo、SP、巴西、05508-000
        • University Hospital of Sao Paulo University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

不超过 1年 (孩子)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age < 12 months
  • Clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis (viral respiratory disease and wheezing)
  • First episode of wheezing in life
  • Moderate respiratory distress, defined as 2 of the following: Sat <93%, respiratory rate >60 and/or RDAI score >4

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous episodes of wheezing in history
  • Use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids or antibiotics in the 24 hours prior to admission or at any time during treatment.
  • Other clinical conditions such as: prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis, cardiac disease or immunodeficiencies.
  • detection of alveolar infiltrates suggestive of pneumonia in radiologic examination
  • respiratory impairment requiring mechanical ventilation on arrival to hospital.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:四人间

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
安慰剂比较:Normal Saline
Patients will receive inhaled normal saline, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation. When they attain sat>94% AND respiratory rate <60 AND RDAI score <4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours. If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged. If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
实验性的:Hypertonic Saline
Patients will receive inhaled Hypertonic Saline 3%, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation. When they attain sat>94% AND respiratory rate <60 AND RDAI score <4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours. If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged. If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
Sodium Chloride 3% solution, previously prepared in 5 mL syringes.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Rate of Admission
大体时间:24 hours
Patients staying longer than 24h are considered to be admitted to ward.
24 hours
Time to Attain Discharge Criteria
大体时间:24 hours
Discharge criteria are: Room air saturation >94% AND respiratory rate < 60 AND Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score inferior than 4, maintained over a 4 hour period.
24 hours

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Time to Discharge
大体时间:24 hours
Actual time to discharge was considered of secondary importance as it can be influenced by individual considerations like patient age or time of the day.
24 hours
Rate of Readmission After Discharge
大体时间:5 days
The mere attendance to the Emergency Department will not be isolately considered, as it may be due to a scheduled reevaluation.
5 days
Incidence of Adverse Effects
大体时间:24 hours
Any adverse effects directly attributable to treatment shall be noted. Mere lack of improve or worsening of symptoms attributable to the disease clinical course will not be considered as adverse effects.
24 hours

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Mateus D Leme, MD、Sao Paulo University

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

一般刊物

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始

2013年7月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2014年12月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2014年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2014年1月22日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2014年1月22日

首次发布 (估计)

2014年1月24日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (估计)

2015年1月12日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2015年1月5日

最后验证

2015年1月1日

更多信息

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅