Inhaled Hypertonic Saline Use in the Emergency Department to Treat Acute Viral Bronchiolitis
Study of the Effect of Inhaled 3% Hypertonic Saline Compared With Normal Saline (0,9%) for the Treatment of Acute Viral Bronchiolitis in a Short Stay Ward
Acute viral bronchiolitis is an extremely common childhood disease, responsible for approximately 17% of childhood admissions to hospital per year, with an annually cost that reaches U$ 500 million.
Despite being a well known disease among pediatricians, there are few, if any, effective treatment options apart from oxygen supplementation and adequate hydration.
The purpose of this study is to determine wether nebulized hypertonic saline (3%) is more effective than normal saline (0,9%) when used in repeated doses during the first 24 hours of in-hospital treatment.
調査の概要
詳細な説明
Acute viral bronchiolitis is a lower airway infection, caused manly by Respiratory Syncytial Virus. Near 1% of children up to 2 years of age get it with sufficient severity to warrant hospital admission, with an annual cost of about U$ 500 million in the US, superior, for instance, than cystic fibrosis annual cost.
Despite the physiopathology and clinical course being well known among pediatricians, few therapeutical options other than adequate hydration and oxygen supplementation have proven to be effective Corticosteroids are not effective and bronchodilators are controversial, and treatment is still mostly empiric and lacking evidence.
In the last few years, there has been a growing interest in the use of nebulized hypertonic saline (HS) as a promising approach. The rational is that HS would help reducing edema and mucus viscosity, enhancing its rheologic properties. Recent studies suggest that HS could reduce up to 1 day (25%) of time until discharge in admitted patients. In the Emergency Department, HS was not superior to other forms of treatment, but these studies lack power and similarities to draw further conclusions. Also, time of treatment and ideal interval between doses are not known as yet.
To our knowledge, few if any studies have assessed patients with an intermediary (up to 24h) time of stay, namely a short stay ward attached to an emergency department. Thus, we have endeavoured to determine if repeated doses of nebulized HS are superior to nebulized normal saline (NS) during the first 24 hour of treatment, when considered: rate of admission, time until discharge, time until attain discharge criteria, and rate of readmission after discharge.
Furthermore, most studies use HS associated to a bronchodilator, because of a theoretical possibility that HS alone could induce bronchoconstriction and worsen respiratory symptoms. However, recent studies have shown that HS use without bronchodilators have not caused any worsening of symptoms in bronchiolitis patients. Therefore, we propose to study the effect of HS alone, without the adding of bronchodilators, which would minimize bias in the treatment group.
研究の種類
入学 (実際)
段階
- 適用できない
連絡先と場所
研究場所
-
-
SP
-
Sao Paulo、SP、ブラジル、05508-000
- University Hospital of Sao Paulo University
-
-
参加基準
適格基準
就学可能な年齢
健康ボランティアの受け入れ
受講資格のある性別
説明
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age < 12 months
- Clinical diagnosis of bronchiolitis (viral respiratory disease and wheezing)
- First episode of wheezing in life
- Moderate respiratory distress, defined as 2 of the following: Sat <93%, respiratory rate >60 and/or RDAI score >4
Exclusion Criteria:
- Previous episodes of wheezing in history
- Use of bronchodilators, corticosteroids or antibiotics in the 24 hours prior to admission or at any time during treatment.
- Other clinical conditions such as: prematurity, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, cystic fibrosis, cardiac disease or immunodeficiencies.
- detection of alveolar infiltrates suggestive of pneumonia in radiologic examination
- respiratory impairment requiring mechanical ventilation on arrival to hospital.
研究計画
研究はどのように設計されていますか?
デザインの詳細
- 主な目的:処理
- 割り当て:ランダム化
- 介入モデル:並列代入
- マスキング:4倍
武器と介入
参加者グループ / アーム |
介入・治療 |
|---|---|
|
プラセボコンパレーター:Normal Saline
Patients will receive inhaled normal saline, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation.
When they attain sat>94% AND respiratory rate <60 AND RDAI score <4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours.
If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged.
If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.
|
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
|
|
実験的:Hypertonic Saline
Patients will receive inhaled Hypertonic Saline 3%, initially with a 2 hour interval, and clinical evaluation prior to each inhalation.
When they attain sat>94% AND respiratory rate <60 AND RDAI score <4, the interval between inhalations will be changed to 4 hours.
If they maintain these criteria for a whole 4 hour interval, they are discharged.
If they do not improve enough to be discharged in 24 hours from the first inhalation, they are considered as admitted to hospital.
|
Immunofluorescence analysis of nasal aspirate
Sodium Chloride 3% solution, previously prepared in 5 mL syringes.
|
この研究は何を測定していますか?
主要な結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Rate of Admission
時間枠:24 hours
|
Patients staying longer than 24h are considered to be admitted to ward.
|
24 hours
|
|
Time to Attain Discharge Criteria
時間枠:24 hours
|
Discharge criteria are: Room air saturation >94% AND respiratory rate < 60 AND Respiratory Distress Assessment Instrument (RDAI) score inferior than 4, maintained over a 4 hour period.
|
24 hours
|
二次結果の測定
結果測定 |
メジャーの説明 |
時間枠 |
|---|---|---|
|
Time to Discharge
時間枠:24 hours
|
Actual time to discharge was considered of secondary importance as it can be influenced by individual considerations like patient age or time of the day.
|
24 hours
|
|
Rate of Readmission After Discharge
時間枠:5 days
|
The mere attendance to the Emergency Department will not be isolately considered, as it may be due to a scheduled reevaluation.
|
5 days
|
|
Incidence of Adverse Effects
時間枠:24 hours
|
Any adverse effects directly attributable to treatment shall be noted.
Mere lack of improve or worsening of symptoms attributable to the disease clinical course will not be considered as adverse effects.
|
24 hours
|
協力者と研究者
スポンサー
捜査官
- 主任研究者:Mateus D Leme, MD、Sao Paulo University
出版物と役立つリンク
一般刊行物
- Mandelberg A, Tal G, Witzling M, Someck E, Houri S, Balin A, Priel IE. Nebulized 3% hypertonic saline solution treatment in hospitalized infants with viral bronchiolitis. Chest. 2003 Feb;123(2):481-7. doi: 10.1378/chest.123.2.481.
- Kuzik BA, Al-Qadhi SA, Kent S, Flavin MP, Hopman W, Hotte S, Gander S. Nebulized hypertonic saline in the treatment of viral bronchiolitis in infants. J Pediatr. 2007 Sep;151(3):266-70, 270.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2007.04.010. Epub 2007 Jun 29.
- Anil AB, Anil M, Saglam AB, Cetin N, Bal A, Aksu N. High volume normal saline alone is as effective as nebulized salbutamol-normal saline, epinephrine-normal saline, and 3% saline in mild bronchiolitis. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Jan;45(1):41-7. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21108.
- Zhang L, Mendoza-Sassi RA, Wainwright C, Klassen TP. Nebulised hypertonic saline solution for acute bronchiolitis in infants. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Jul 31;(7):CD006458. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006458.pub3.
- Principi T, Komar L. A critical review of "a randomized trial of nebulized 3% hypertonic saline with epinephrine in the treatment of acute bronchiolitis in the emergency department.". J Popul Ther Clin Pharmacol. 2011;18(2):e273-4. Epub 2011 May 16. No abstract available.
- Jacobs JD, Foster M, Wan J, Pershad J. 7% Hypertonic saline in acute bronchiolitis: a randomized controlled trial. Pediatrics. 2014 Jan;133(1):e8-13. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-1646. Epub 2013 Dec 16.
- Mandelberg A, Amirav I. Hypertonic saline or high volume normal saline for viral bronchiolitis: mechanisms and rationale. Pediatr Pulmonol. 2010 Jan;45(1):36-40. doi: 10.1002/ppul.21185. No abstract available.
- Kuzik BA, Flavin MP, Kent S, Zielinski D, Kwan CW, Adeleye A, Vegsund BC, Rossi C. Effect of inhaled hypertonic saline on hospital admission rate in children with viral bronchiolitis: a randomized trial. CJEM. 2010 Nov;12(6):477-84. doi: 10.1017/s1481803500012690.
研究記録日
主要日程の研究
研究開始
一次修了 (実際)
研究の完了 (実際)
試験登録日
最初に提出
QC基準を満たした最初の提出物
最初の投稿 (見積もり)
学習記録の更新
投稿された最後の更新 (見積もり)
QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました
最終確認日
詳しくは
この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。
Chest X-Rayの臨床試験
-
Johns Hopkins UniversityNational Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases (NIAMS)完了
-
Biobeat Technologies Ltd.Mayo Clinic募集血圧 | 心臓病 | 高血圧症 (HTN) | 血圧監視アメリカ, イスラエル, イタリア
-
Northwestern UniversityNational Parkinson Foundation完了
-
The University of Hong KongLondon School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine; Nagasaki University完了
-
University Hospital, Ghent完了
-
University of Manitobaまだ募集していません骨折、骨 | X線合併症 | 骨折合併症