A Pilot Efficacy and Implementation Study of the Strengths Intervention Project (SIP)
2019年10月14日 更新者：Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
The purpose of this study is to test a strengths-based intervention to be delivered in a primary care setting with adolescents and a parent.
Investigators want to find out if the intervention can help parents and teens communicate.
Specifically Investigators want to see if they can help parents and teens identify and build teen's strengths.
Half the dyads will receive the educational materials in conjunction with their teen's well-child visit, while the other half will receive usual care at the well-child visit and receive the educational materials at the end of the study.
Additionally, Investigators expect that a strengths-based intervention may also impact adherence to treatment in youth with a chronic illness.
As such, Investigators will include a subgroup of teenagers diagnosed with asthma in this study, to assess whether the strengths-based intervention that the Investigators developed has an impact on adherence.
研究概览
详细说明
Recent research suggests that parents and adolescents report an interest in doctors facilitating increased parent-teen communication about teen strengths. However, little research focuses on how to address this need in a primary care setting. Content from subject matter experts along with data gathered from parents and teens were used to develop a novel strengths-based intervention to be tested in primary care.
The study intervention being examined is called the Strengths Intervention Project and includes a written pamphlet, a guided discussion activity, in-person/phone health coaching, and in-person or mailed health care provider endorsement and key messaging. Measures will be collected at baseline pre-intervention (T1), in clinic or over the phone at the time of the intervention (T2), approximately two weeks post-intervention (T3), and approximately 2 months post-intervention (T4). Daily diaries will also be utilized twice to gather data pre- and post- intervention. We will measure feasibility of clinic implementation of intervention, as well as influence of intervention on parent-teen communication and adolescent outcomes.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (实际的)
174
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习地点
-
-
Pennsylvania
-
Philadelphia、Pennsylvania、美国、19104
- The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
13年 至 15年 (孩子)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Adolescent Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Teens age 13 to 15 years at the time of their upcoming well-child visit (Arm 1) OR Teens age 13 to 15 years at the time of their last well-child visit (Arm 2)
- Children's Hospital of Philadelphia (CHOP) primary care patient (Arm 1 and 2)
- Scheduled for a well-child visit that parent and teen both plan to attend (Arm 1) OR Attended a well-child visit with parent (Arm 2)
- Diagnosed with Asthma > year (asthma subgroup; Arm 1 only)
- Prescribed a controller medication year-round (asthma subgroup; Arm 1 only)
- Adolescent has their own email account to complete electronic surveys (Arm 1 and 2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not fluent in written or spoken English (Arm 1 and 2)
- Attending a new patient well-child visit (Arm 1) OR attended a new patient well-child visit (Arm 2)
- Presence of developmental delay or pervasive developmental disorder that requires special education services (Arm 1 and 2)
- Psychiatric hospitalization of the adolescent in the past year (Arm 1 and 2)
- Participated in studies: CHOP IRB # 15-011732 and/or CHOP IRB # 17-013895 (Arm 1 and 2)
- Adolescent has sibling enrolled in (IRB 18-014922) (Arm 1 and 2)
Parent Criteria:
Inclusion Criteria:
- Parent or legal guardian of a teen age 13 to 15 years at their upcoming well-child visit at a CHOP primary care practice (Arm 1) OR Parent or legal guardian of a teen age 13 to 15 years at their recent well-child visit at a CHOP primary care practice (Arm 2)
- Parent has their own email account to complete electronic surveys (Arm 1 and 2)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not fluent in written or spoken English (Arm 1 and 2)
- Participated in studies: CHOP IRB # 15-011732 and/or CHOP IRB # 17-013895 (Arm 1 and 2)
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：其他
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Intervention Group (Arm 1- Main)
Will receive the "Build Your Teen's Strengths" educational pamphlet, health coaching sessions, and provider endorsement.
|
This is a clinic based psychoeducational intervention for adolescent patients and their parents to improve parent-teen communication about teen strengths.
The intervention is designed, if possible, to coincide with the adolescent patients' well-child visits and consists of the following components: (1) In-person or over the phone orientation session with a trained health coach and parent, (2) Distribution of psychoeducational materials to the parent, (3) Endorsement and delivery of key messages from the health care provider, and (4) "Booster" phone call placed by the health coach.
|
|
无干预：Control Group (Arm 1- Main)
Will receive usual care at well-child visit.
|
|
|
实验性的：Intervention Group (Arm 1-asthma subgroup)
Will receive the "Build Your Teen's Strengths" educational pamphlet, health coaching sessions, and provider endorsement.
|
This is a clinic based psychoeducational intervention for adolescent patients and their parents to improve parent-teen communication about teen strengths.
The intervention is designed, if possible, to coincide with the adolescent patients' well-child visits and consists of the following components: (1) In-person or over the phone orientation session with a trained health coach and parent, (2) Distribution of psychoeducational materials to the parent, (3) Endorsement and delivery of key messages from the health care provider, and (4) "Booster" phone call placed by the health coach.
|
|
无干预：Control Group (Arm 1-asthma subgroup)
Will receive usual care at well-child visit.
|
|
|
无干预：Control Group (Arm 2)
Convenience sample used for a post-hoc, exploratory analysis.
Will receive usual care at well-child visit.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Beliefs about Adolescents
大体时间：Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
26 items (parents only); Likert scale (1= very unlikely; 7= very, very likely)
|
Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
|
Change in Parent-Adolescent Communication (PACS)
大体时间：Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
20 items (parent and teens); Likert scale (1= strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree)
|
Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
|
Change in Confidence in exploring and using adolescent's strengths
大体时间：Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
15 items (parents and teens); Likert scale (1=strongly disagree; 5= strongly agree)
|
Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
|
Feasibility of consent rates
大体时间：9 months
|
Feasibility will be demonstrated by consent rates ≥60%
|
9 months
|
|
Feasibility of intervention implementation
大体时间：1 month
|
Completion of core intervention components ≥ 70%.
|
1 month
|
|
Parent and adolescent acceptability of intervention materials
大体时间：2-weeks post intervention (T3)
|
Adolescent and parent acceptability ratings ≥80%.
Investigators will also elicit open-ended feedback.
|
2-weeks post intervention (T3)
|
|
Parent and adolescent acceptability of intervention materials (additional)
大体时间：2-months post intervention (T4)
|
2 items (parents and teens); Yes/No/Not sure and Likert scale (1=very likely; 5 very unlikely)
|
2-months post intervention (T4)
|
|
Provider acceptability of intervention
大体时间：9 months
|
Provider acceptability ratings ≥80%.
Investigators will also elicit open-ended feedback.
|
9 months
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Psychological well-being using the Flourishing Scale
大体时间：Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
Measure of psychological well-being.
8 items (parents and teens).
(Likert scale 1= Strongly disagree; 2= Disagree; 3= Slightly disagree; 4= Mixed or neither agree nor disagree; 5= Slightly agree; 6= Agree; 7= Strongly agree).
Score will be summed for range of 8 (Strong Disagreement with all items) to 56 (Strong Agreement with items).
High scores signify that respondents view themselves in positive terms in important areas of functioning.
|
Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
|
Change in Adherence to inhaled controller medication use
大体时间：Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
2-items about adherence to inhaled controller medication use (parent and teen) will be assessed using the Visual analog scale (0-10).
|
Baseline (T1) and 2-months (T4)
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Victoria A Miller, PhD、Children's Hospital of Phiadelphia
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Schoenfeld D. Statistical considerations for pilot studies. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1980 Mar;6(3):371-4. doi: 10.1016/0360-3016(80)90153-4. No abstract available.
- Ford CA, Cheek C, Culhane J, Fishman J, Mathew L, Salek EC, Webb D, Jaccard J. Parent and Adolescent Interest in Receiving Adolescent Health Communication Information From Primary Care Clinicians. J Adolesc Health. 2016 Aug;59(2):154-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.03.001. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
- Ford CA, Davenport AF, Meier A, McRee AL. Partnerships between parents and health care professionals to improve adolescent health. J Adolesc Health. 2011 Jul;49(1):53-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2010.10.004. Epub 2011 Mar 12.
- Jaccard J, Dodge T, Dittus P. Parent-adolescent communication about sex and birth control: a conceptual framework. New Dir Child Adolesc Dev. 2002 Fall;(97):9-41. doi: 10.1002/cd.48. No abstract available.
- Walsh JC, Mandalia S, Gazzard BG. Responses to a 1 month self-report on adherence to antiretroviral therapy are consistent with electronic data and virological treatment outcome. AIDS. 2002 Jan 25;16(2):269-77. doi: 10.1097/00002030-200201250-00017.
- Viner RM, Christie D, Taylor V, Hey S. Motivational/solution-focused intervention improves HbA1c in adolescents with Type 1 diabetes: a pilot study. Diabet Med. 2003 Sep;20(9):739-42. doi: 10.1046/j.1464-5491.2003.00995.x.
- Elster AB, Kuznets NJ. AMA Guidelines for Adolescent Preventive Services (GAPS): Recommendations and Rationale. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins; 1994.
- Hagan J, Shaw J, PM Duncan PM e. Bright Futures: Guidelines for Health Supervision of Infants, Children, and Adolescents 4th ed. Elk Grove Village, IL: American Academy of Pediatrics; 2017.
- Duncan PM, Garcia AC, Frankowski BL, Carey PA, Kallock EA, Dixon RD, Shaw JS. Inspiring healthy adolescent choices: a rationale for and guide to strength promotion in primary care. J Adolesc Health. 2007 Dec;41(6):525-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2007.05.024. Epub 2007 Aug 29.
- Catalano RF, Berglund ML, Ryan JAM, et al. Positive youth development in the United States: research findings on evaluations of positive youth development programs. Ann Am Acad Pol Soc Sci 2004;591:98 -125.
- Mangione-Smith R, DeCristofaro AH, Setodji CM, Keesey J, Klein DJ, Adams JL, Schuster MA, McGlynn EA. The quality of ambulatory care delivered to children in the United States. N Engl J Med. 2007 Oct 11;357(15):1515-23. doi: 10.1056/NEJMsa064637.
- Hammig B, Jozkowski K. Health Education Counseling During Pediatric Well-Child Visits in Physicians' Office Settings. Clin Pediatr (Phila). 2015 Jul;54(8):752-8. doi: 10.1177/0009922815584943. Epub 2015 Apr 29.
- Rosenberg AR, Yi-Frazier JP, Eaton L, Wharton C, Cochrane K, Pihoker C, Baker KS, McCauley E. Promoting Resilience in Stress Management: A Pilot Study of a Novel Resilience-Promoting Intervention for Adolescents and Young Adults With Serious Illness. J Pediatr Psychol. 2015 Oct;40(9):992-9. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsv004. Epub 2015 Feb 11.
- Steinhardt MA, Mamerow MM, Brown SA, Jolly CA. A resilience intervention in African American adults with type 2 diabetes: a pilot study of efficacy. Diabetes Educ. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):274-84. doi: 10.1177/0145721708329698. Epub 2009 Feb 9.
- Maslow G, Adams C, Willis M, Neukirch J, Herts K, Froehlich W, Calleson D, Rickerby M. An evaluation of a positive youth development program for adolescents with chronic illness. J Adolesc Health. 2013 Feb;52(2):179-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2012.06.020. Epub 2012 Aug 17.
- Buchanan, C. M., & Holmbeck, G. N. (1998). Measuring beliefs about adolescent personality and behavior. J. Youth Adolescence 27(5): 607-627
- Olson, D. H. Family inventories: Inventories used in a national survey of families across the life cycle. St Paul, MN: Family Social Science, University of Minnesota. 1985
- Diener, E. et al. (2010). New Well-being Measures: Short Scales to Assess Flourishing and Positive and Negative Feelings. Social Indicators Research, 97(2), 143-156.
- Hair, EC et al. (2005). The Parent-Adolescent Relationship Scale. Adolescent & Family Health, 4(1), 12-25.
- Miller VA, Silva K, Friedrich E, Robles R, Ford CA. Efficacy of a Primary Care-Based Intervention to Promote Parent-Teen Communication and Well-Being: A Randomized Controlled Trial. J Pediatr. 2020 Jul;222:200-206.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2020.03.050. Epub 2020 May 19.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
2018年5月4日
初级完成 (实际的)
2019年5月31日
研究完成 (实际的)
2019年5月31日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2018年3月21日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2018年4月11日
首次发布 (实际的)
2018年4月12日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2019年10月15日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2019年10月14日
最后验证
2019年10月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他研究编号
- 18-014922
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
不
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.