此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Technology Enabled Asthma Management System (TEAMS) Pilot Study (TEAMS)

2020年3月17日 更新者:Jennifer Mammen、University of Rochester

To evaluate feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a novel patient-centered, technology-based intervention to improve asthma care in younger adult smartphone users.

The program, called TEAMS (Technology Enabled Asthma Management System), uses a combination of smartphone symptom monitoring, guideline-based medication protocols, nursing telemedicine home visits, and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) custom programming.

TEAMS is intended to augment primary asthma care as provided at the University of Rochester Medicine Clinic.

研究概览

详细说明

Uncontrolled asthma is a tremendous burden to individuals and society. Asthma is one of the most common chronic health conditions globally, affecting more than 8.2% of adults in the U.S. Of adults with asthma in the U.S., 63% have persistent disease, and less than half are well-controlled. Uncontrolled asthma is associated with bothersome symptoms, economic burden, lost work time, and poorer quality of life. Direct and indirect costs are estimated at 56 billion dollars annually, with over 1.8 million ED visits, 439,000 hospitalizations, and 3,400 deaths in 2010 alone. Asthma morbidity and mortality is preventable. Correct use of controller medication and effective self-management alleviates symptoms, prevents exacerbations, and minimizes long-term damage to lungs associated with pulmonary remodeling. For these reasons, the National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI) Guidelines recommend that all individuals with persistent asthma should take daily controller medications and receive consistent self-management training.

Currently, less than half of adults with persistent asthma take controller medication, and most do not self-manage their asthma effectively. Patient, provider, and systems-level factors contribute to this pattern. Patients fail to report symptoms, take medications inconsistently, and have insufficient resources (knowledge, time, transportation, money) to manage their disease.Providers in turn may lack familiarity with current best-practice guidelines, follow alternate prescribing practices, or spend insufficient time educating patients. Translation of asthma management knowledge into practice-based solutions is urgently needed. Many asthma interventions have been implemented within investigator-controlled settings. Problematically, few have been evaluated within or translated into the context of real world practice, and thus hold little benefit for the greater patient population. Limited ability to translate interventions from the bench to clinical settings suggests a need to develop and test interventions within the context in which they are intended to function. Effective real-world intervention to improve asthma outcomes requires development of a multifaceted program targeting key factors at the patient, provider, and systems level.

These include:

  • Patient tendency to ignore, forget, and not report symptoms;
  • Patient non-adherence to prescribed medication;
  • Patient lack of self-management skills and knowledge on how to self-manage effectively;
  • Barriers to consistent follow-up (access to care, burdens of time and transportation);
  • Provider non-adherence to National Guidelines for step-wise management of asthma; and
  • Provider underestimation of symptoms, and lack of time to provide thorough asthma education.

Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy of comprehensive Technology Enabled Asthma Management System (TEAMS), which addresses these critical factors, in order to improve asthma management and outcomes in younger adults.

The specific aims of the study are:

Aim 1: To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of TEAMS. • Hypothesis A: TEAMS will be feasible for and acceptable to young adults and primary care providers for routine management of asthma, as measured by USE-Q survey data, frequency of symptom self-monitoring and at completion of least one virtual visit, and post-intervention qualitative interviews.

Aim 2: To evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of TEAMS.

• Hypothesis B: TEAMS will be associated with improved asthma outcomes following intervention, as measured by primary outcomes of: (a) increased asthma control, pulmonary function, quality of life, and secondary outcomes of (b) decreased office visits for asthma exacerbations, asthma-related ED visits, and hospitalizations.

Aim 3: To optimize TEAMS intervention components based on quantitative survey data and qualitative interviews, including patient subject and clinic staff perspectives.

2. STUDY DESIGN

2.1. Overview TEAMS is a multi-level, theoretically-based intervention that capitalizes on patient-provider-nurse partnerships and use of technology to improve the quality and convenience of routine asthma care. TEAMS has Social Cognitive Theory underpinnings. It targets person level factors associated with asthma outcomes (individual knowledge, norms, attitudes, illness beliefs and self-efficacy), self-management behaviors (prevention, monitoring, management and communication of symptoms), and environmental factors (access to care, delivery of guideline-based care).

The overarching goal of TEAMS is to improve asthma outcomes by leveraging capabilities of existing technology (smartphone, telemedicine, electronic medical record). TEAMS will operate in conjunction with standard care in the Medicine Clinic.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

44

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • New York
      • Rochester、New York、美国、14642
        • University of Rochester

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

18年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

有资格学习的性别

全部

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

Patient Subjects:

  • Target population, Age 18-40; Age criteria may be expanded to include adults older than 40 as needed to meet recruitment needs
  • With a diagnosis of intermittent or persistent asthma;
  • Possessing an active smartphone with data plan or WiFi access;
  • Able to communicate in English.
  • Able to perform study-related functions
  • Able to give informed consent.

(All patient subjects will be counseled that telemedicine visits consume large amounts of data, and that use of Wifi is recommended. Patient subjects will be required to initial acknowledgement of this in the consent form. Currently however, many people have unlimited data plans, which may allow visits away from Wifi.)

Provider Subjects:

• Primary care provider to patient subjects enrolled in the study

Other Staff Subjects:

• Secretarial or Nursing staff at the clinic, having interaction with patient subjects or procedures.

Exclusion Criteria:

Patient Subjects:

  • Diagnosis of confounding respiratory or cardiac diseases (e.g. cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis, COPD, CHF, Hypertension);
  • Pregnancy

Provider Subjects:

• None

Other Staff Subjects:

• None

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:支持治疗
  • 分配:不适用
  • 介入模型:单组作业
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:TEAMS
Routine asthma care, as provided in the University of Rochester Medical Center Medicine Clinic, will be augmented by three intervention components over a six-month pilot period : (1) Patient subject smartphone asthma monitoring; (2) Nursing telemedicine follow up (virtual home visits); (3) EMR custom programming to guide nursing assessment and management.
See description of arm
其他名称:
  • 团队

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Acceptability of the TEAMS program for routine asthma management for patients as assessed by USE-Q at end of study
大体时间:6 months
The USE-Q (Usability Satisfaction and Ease of Use Questionnaire) is a 7 point Likert type scale that consists of 21 positive statements which the user rates on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0= strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree.
6 months
Change in asthma control from baseline to end of study at 6 months
大体时间:6 months
Clinician-rated asthma control will be measured using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) by Juniper. The instrument has 7 questions, each with a range of 0-6 with lower scores representing better asthma control. Total ACQ score is the average of the 7 individual items. A mean score of 0.75 (or less) on the ACQ has a positive predictive value of 0.85 for controlled asthma. A mean score of 1.5 or higher has a positive predictive value of 0.88 for uncontrolled asthma. Minimum important difference (MID) for the ACQ is a change score of 0.5.
6 months
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume over 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end of study at 6 months
大体时间:6 months
FEV1 will be measured using a digital peak flow meter with FEV1 capacity
6 months
Change in Asthma-related Quality of life from baseline to end of study at 6 months
大体时间:6 months
Asthma-related quality of life will be measured using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)) by Juniper. The AQLQ measures physical and emotional impact of disease. There are 32 items with a range of 1-7 each, with higher scores representing better quality of life. (7=no impairment; 4= moderate impairment; 1=maximum impairment). The AQLQ consists of 4 domains. Domain scores are computed by averaging the scores of individual items which range from 7 (no impairment) to 1 (maximal impairment). The total AQLQ is computed by averaging the scores across all domains. MID for change in AQLQ total score is 0.5 total, and 0.5 per domain.
6 months

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in frequency of acute healthcare utilization from baseline to end of study at 6 month
大体时间:6 months
Counts (frequency) of asthma-related acute healthcare visits will be extracted from the electronic medical record (ED visits and hospitalizations related to asthma) and will be compared for the equivalent 6 months prior to intervention and the 6 months of intervention
6 months
(Qualitative) Participant experiences with and perceptions of TEAMS program
大体时间:6 months
Assessment of participants experiences with and perceptions of the TEAMS program, as assessed by in-depth semi-structured qualitative interview (1:1).
6 months

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Tiffany Gommel, MS, CIM, CIP、University of Rochester

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2018年2月15日

初级完成 (实际的)

2020年2月5日

研究完成 (实际的)

2020年3月17日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年7月31日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2018年8月23日

首次发布 (实际的)

2018年8月27日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2020年3月18日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2020年3月17日

最后验证

2020年3月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅