- ICH GCP
- Registro de ensaios clínicos dos EUA
- Ensaio Clínico NCT03648203
Technology Enabled Asthma Management System (TEAMS) Pilot Study (TEAMS)
To evaluate feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy of a novel patient-centered, technology-based intervention to improve asthma care in younger adult smartphone users.
The program, called TEAMS (Technology Enabled Asthma Management System), uses a combination of smartphone symptom monitoring, guideline-based medication protocols, nursing telemedicine home visits, and Electronic Medical Record (EMR) custom programming.
TEAMS is intended to augment primary asthma care as provided at the University of Rochester Medicine Clinic.
Visão geral do estudo
Status
Condições
Intervenção / Tratamento
Descrição detalhada
Uncontrolled asthma is a tremendous burden to individuals and society. Asthma is one of the most common chronic health conditions globally, affecting more than 8.2% of adults in the U.S. Of adults with asthma in the U.S., 63% have persistent disease, and less than half are well-controlled. Uncontrolled asthma is associated with bothersome symptoms, economic burden, lost work time, and poorer quality of life. Direct and indirect costs are estimated at 56 billion dollars annually, with over 1.8 million ED visits, 439,000 hospitalizations, and 3,400 deaths in 2010 alone. Asthma morbidity and mortality is preventable. Correct use of controller medication and effective self-management alleviates symptoms, prevents exacerbations, and minimizes long-term damage to lungs associated with pulmonary remodeling. For these reasons, the National Heart Lung & Blood Institute (NHLBI) Guidelines recommend that all individuals with persistent asthma should take daily controller medications and receive consistent self-management training.
Currently, less than half of adults with persistent asthma take controller medication, and most do not self-manage their asthma effectively. Patient, provider, and systems-level factors contribute to this pattern. Patients fail to report symptoms, take medications inconsistently, and have insufficient resources (knowledge, time, transportation, money) to manage their disease.Providers in turn may lack familiarity with current best-practice guidelines, follow alternate prescribing practices, or spend insufficient time educating patients. Translation of asthma management knowledge into practice-based solutions is urgently needed. Many asthma interventions have been implemented within investigator-controlled settings. Problematically, few have been evaluated within or translated into the context of real world practice, and thus hold little benefit for the greater patient population. Limited ability to translate interventions from the bench to clinical settings suggests a need to develop and test interventions within the context in which they are intended to function. Effective real-world intervention to improve asthma outcomes requires development of a multifaceted program targeting key factors at the patient, provider, and systems level.
These include:
- Patient tendency to ignore, forget, and not report symptoms;
- Patient non-adherence to prescribed medication;
- Patient lack of self-management skills and knowledge on how to self-manage effectively;
- Barriers to consistent follow-up (access to care, burdens of time and transportation);
- Provider non-adherence to National Guidelines for step-wise management of asthma; and
- Provider underestimation of symptoms, and lack of time to provide thorough asthma education.
Therefore, the purpose of this study is to test feasibility, acceptability, safety, and preliminary efficacy of comprehensive Technology Enabled Asthma Management System (TEAMS), which addresses these critical factors, in order to improve asthma management and outcomes in younger adults.
The specific aims of the study are:
Aim 1: To evaluate feasibility and acceptability of TEAMS. • Hypothesis A: TEAMS will be feasible for and acceptable to young adults and primary care providers for routine management of asthma, as measured by USE-Q survey data, frequency of symptom self-monitoring and at completion of least one virtual visit, and post-intervention qualitative interviews.
Aim 2: To evaluate safety and preliminary efficacy of TEAMS.
• Hypothesis B: TEAMS will be associated with improved asthma outcomes following intervention, as measured by primary outcomes of: (a) increased asthma control, pulmonary function, quality of life, and secondary outcomes of (b) decreased office visits for asthma exacerbations, asthma-related ED visits, and hospitalizations.
Aim 3: To optimize TEAMS intervention components based on quantitative survey data and qualitative interviews, including patient subject and clinic staff perspectives.
2. STUDY DESIGN
2.1. Overview TEAMS is a multi-level, theoretically-based intervention that capitalizes on patient-provider-nurse partnerships and use of technology to improve the quality and convenience of routine asthma care. TEAMS has Social Cognitive Theory underpinnings. It targets person level factors associated with asthma outcomes (individual knowledge, norms, attitudes, illness beliefs and self-efficacy), self-management behaviors (prevention, monitoring, management and communication of symptoms), and environmental factors (access to care, delivery of guideline-based care).
The overarching goal of TEAMS is to improve asthma outcomes by leveraging capabilities of existing technology (smartphone, telemedicine, electronic medical record). TEAMS will operate in conjunction with standard care in the Medicine Clinic.
Tipo de estudo
Inscrição (Real)
Estágio
- Não aplicável
Contactos e Locais
Locais de estudo
-
-
New York
-
Rochester, New York, Estados Unidos, 14642
- University of Rochester
-
-
Critérios de participação
Critérios de elegibilidade
Idades elegíveis para estudo
Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis
Gêneros Elegíveis para o Estudo
Descrição
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient Subjects:
- Target population, Age 18-40; Age criteria may be expanded to include adults older than 40 as needed to meet recruitment needs
- With a diagnosis of intermittent or persistent asthma;
- Possessing an active smartphone with data plan or WiFi access;
- Able to communicate in English.
- Able to perform study-related functions
- Able to give informed consent.
(All patient subjects will be counseled that telemedicine visits consume large amounts of data, and that use of Wifi is recommended. Patient subjects will be required to initial acknowledgement of this in the consent form. Currently however, many people have unlimited data plans, which may allow visits away from Wifi.)
Provider Subjects:
• Primary care provider to patient subjects enrolled in the study
Other Staff Subjects:
• Secretarial or Nursing staff at the clinic, having interaction with patient subjects or procedures.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patient Subjects:
- Diagnosis of confounding respiratory or cardiac diseases (e.g. cystic fibrosis, sarcoidosis, COPD, CHF, Hypertension);
- Pregnancy
Provider Subjects:
• None
Other Staff Subjects:
• None
Plano de estudo
Como o estudo é projetado?
Detalhes do projeto
- Finalidade Principal: Cuidados de suporte
- Alocação: N / D
- Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição de grupo único
- Mascaramento: Nenhum (rótulo aberto)
Armas e Intervenções
Grupo de Participantes / Braço |
Intervenção / Tratamento |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: TEAMS
Routine asthma care, as provided in the University of Rochester Medical Center Medicine Clinic, will be augmented by three intervention components over a six-month pilot period : (1) Patient subject smartphone asthma monitoring; (2) Nursing telemedicine follow up (virtual home visits); (3) EMR custom programming to guide nursing assessment and management.
|
See description of arm
Outros nomes:
|
O que o estudo está medindo?
Medidas de resultados primários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Acceptability of the TEAMS program for routine asthma management for patients as assessed by USE-Q at end of study
Prazo: 6 months
|
The USE-Q (Usability Satisfaction and Ease of Use Questionnaire) is a 7 point Likert type scale that consists of 21 positive statements which the user rates on a 7-point Likert scale, with 0= strongly disagree to 7=strongly agree.
|
6 months
|
|
Change in asthma control from baseline to end of study at 6 months
Prazo: 6 months
|
Clinician-rated asthma control will be measured using the Asthma Control Questionnaire (ACQ) by Juniper.
The instrument has 7 questions, each with a range of 0-6 with lower scores representing better asthma control.
Total ACQ score is the average of the 7 individual items.
A mean score of 0.75 (or less) on the ACQ has a positive predictive value of 0.85 for controlled asthma.
A mean score of 1.5 or higher has a positive predictive value of 0.88 for uncontrolled asthma.
Minimum important difference (MID) for the ACQ is a change score of 0.5.
|
6 months
|
|
Change in Forced Expiratory Volume over 1 second (FEV1) from baseline to end of study at 6 months
Prazo: 6 months
|
FEV1 will be measured using a digital peak flow meter with FEV1 capacity
|
6 months
|
|
Change in Asthma-related Quality of life from baseline to end of study at 6 months
Prazo: 6 months
|
Asthma-related quality of life will be measured using the Asthma Quality of Life Questionnaire (AQLQ(S)) by Juniper.
The AQLQ measures physical and emotional impact of disease.
There are 32 items with a range of 1-7 each, with higher scores representing better quality of life.
(7=no impairment; 4= moderate impairment; 1=maximum impairment).
The AQLQ consists of 4 domains.
Domain scores are computed by averaging the scores of individual items which range from 7 (no impairment) to 1 (maximal impairment).
The total AQLQ is computed by averaging the scores across all domains.
MID for change in AQLQ total score is 0.5 total, and 0.5 per domain.
|
6 months
|
Medidas de resultados secundários
Medida de resultado |
Descrição da medida |
Prazo |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in frequency of acute healthcare utilization from baseline to end of study at 6 month
Prazo: 6 months
|
Counts (frequency) of asthma-related acute healthcare visits will be extracted from the electronic medical record (ED visits and hospitalizations related to asthma) and will be compared for the equivalent 6 months prior to intervention and the 6 months of intervention
|
6 months
|
|
(Qualitative) Participant experiences with and perceptions of TEAMS program
Prazo: 6 months
|
Assessment of participants experiences with and perceptions of the TEAMS program, as assessed by in-depth semi-structured qualitative interview (1:1).
|
6 months
|
Colaboradores e Investigadores
Patrocinador
Colaboradores
Investigadores
- Diretor de estudo: Tiffany Gommel, MS, CIM, CIP, University of Rochester
Publicações e links úteis
Datas de registro do estudo
Datas Principais do Estudo
Início do estudo (Real)
Conclusão Primária (Real)
Conclusão do estudo (Real)
Datas de inscrição no estudo
Enviado pela primeira vez
Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ
Primeira postagem (Real)
Atualizações de registro de estudo
Última Atualização Postada (Real)
Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade
Última verificação
Mais Informações
Termos relacionados a este estudo
Palavras-chave
Termos MeSH relevantes adicionais
Outros números de identificação do estudo
- SON2018-003
Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)
Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?
Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo
Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA
Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .
Ensaios clínicos em Technology Enabled Asthma Management System
-
Shirley Ryan AbilityLabCoapt, LLCAtivo, não recrutandoAmputação de membro inferior abaixo do joelho (lesão) | Amputação de membro inferior acima do joelho (lesão) | Amputação | Dor do membro fantasma | Dor fantasma | Sensação Fantasma | Joelho para Amputação de Membro Inferior | Amputação de membro superior abaixo do cotovelo (lesão) | Dor fantasma após... e outras condiçõesEstados Unidos
-
HealthBeacon PlcModena Allergy & AsthmaInscrevendo-se por convite
-
University of UtahInternational Institute for Restorative Reproductive MedicineConcluídoInfertilidade | Aborto espontâneoEstados Unidos, Canadá, Polônia, Reino Unido
-
Indiana UniversityUniversity of Alabama at Birmingham; University of OttawaConcluídoEsclerose Múltipla ProgressivaEstados Unidos
-
Lawson Health Research InstituteKinetic Concepts, Inc.ConcluídoInfecções pós-operatórias de sítio cirúrgicoCanadá
-
Hip Innovation TechnologyRecrutamentoOsteoartrite, Quadril | Necrose Avascular do Quadril | Doença articular degenerativa | Artropatia Traumática do QuadrilEstados Unidos