此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Genetic Evaluation for Medication Selection (GEMS) Study (GEMS)

2019年10月3日 更新者:David Geldmacher、University of Alabama at Birmingham

Pharmacogenic Guidance to Optimize Safety and Efficacy of Psychotropic Drug Use in Treatment of Behavioral and Psychiatric Symptoms in Dementia

Investigators propose to determine whether knowing details about how a person's genes affect the way medicines work in the brain and body will help doctors pick more effective or safer medicine for that person. Target symptoms are restlessness, agitation, depression and related problems common in people with memory loss and dementia.

研究概览

详细说明

This project offers an innovative approach to improving treatment outcomes for people with Behavioral and psychiatric symptoms of dementia (BPSD), as well as a novel electronic health record (EHR) -compatible means of assessing treatment response. To date, there has been limited investigation of pharmacogenomic testing among people with dementia. Testing has mostly been focused on testing a single Cytochrome P450 (CYP)polymorphism to guide treatment decisions for cognitive enhancing cholinesterase inhibitor medications in patients with Alzheimer disease. Pharmacogenomic guidance of prescribing decisions for psychotropic medications has not been studied for BPSD but there is growing evidence that such analyses can assist in effective prescription decisions for treatment of depression. Since affective symptoms are among the most prominent drivers of BPSD and associated distress, and the highest level evidence for successful treatment of BPSD is with the antidepressant drug citalopram, investigators believe that pharmacogenomic guidance for selection of drugs to treat BPSD is truly innovative, and will provide new insights on implementing safer and more effective treatment for BPSD.

Additionally, investigators will explore the use of the NIH-sponsored Patient Reported Outcomes measurement Information System (PROMIS) as an outcome measure for BPSD. PROMIS is a system of highly reliable, valid, flexible, precise, and responsive assessment tools that measure patient-reported health status. PROMIS measures are available for typical BPSD like anger, anxiety, and depression, but their utility has not been studied in a sample of dementia patients. They offer the potential, through patient-portal EHR interfaces, for clinicians to track treatment responses in a more timely and efficient manner than traditional clinic-based instruments, placing less burden on patients and families to present for in-clinic assessments.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (实际的)

40

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham、Alabama、美国、35233
        • University of Alabama at Birmingham

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

50年 及以上 (成人、年长者)

接受健康志愿者

不适用

有资格学习的性别

全部

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

As director of the Division of Memory Disorders, PI Dr. Geldmacher leads the effort of the four neurologists and two nurse practitioners who provide clinical services at the UAB Memory Disorders Clinic (MDC). During 2013, there were 1595 total outpatient MDC visits for patients with dementia-related diagnoses. A sample of 100 consecutive MDC patients from April 2015 demonstrated that 69 were treated with psychotropic agents, including antidepressants (n=67), antipsychotics (n=6), or both.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Score <26 on the Alabama Brief Cognitive screen or <24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment.
  2. Have a caregiver/informant/family member who spends at least 10 hours per week with the affected person and who is willing to participate
  3. Be rated by a caregiver/informant as scoring ≥9 on the Functional Activities Questionnaire, including at least one domain score of 3 (dependent).
  4. Have BPSD sufficient for the treating clinician to begin or change psychotropic drugs, and of sufficiently mild severity that a delay of 5 days before changing the prescription would not be harmful to the patient.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. BPSD of sufficient severity or intensity that (in clinician's opinion) require immediate medication change or referral for emergency services
  2. Lack of reliable informant with adequate exposure to patient and ability to communicate with study staff in English

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Psychiatric Symptoms of Dementia
大体时间:12 weeks

Comparison from baseline Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire (NPI-Q) and the 12-week follow-up.

Neuropsychiatric Inventory-Questionnaire is a questionnaire completed by caregivers about patients designed to measure both neuropsychiatric symptoms (e.g., agitation/aggression, anxiety, hallucinations). There are 12 symptoms included in NPI-Q. Each domain includes an initial response of "yes" or "no". If "yes", then the caregiver rates the severity of the symptom on a 3-point scale (1= mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe). The NPI-Q provides a total severity score ranged 0-36 with higher scores indicating more severe symptoms.

12 weeks
Behavioral Symptoms of Dementia
大体时间:12 weeks

Comparison from baseline Patient Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and the 12-week follow-up.

This assessment is a self- or informant-rated measure that ascertains mental health domains that are important across psychiatric diagnoses. The scale is used as screener for symptoms severity of the following domains: Anger, anxiety, depression and sleep disturbance. Each item on the measure is rated on a 5-point scale with higher scores reflect greater symptom severity. A rating of mild (i.e., 2) or greater on any item within a domain may serve as a guide for additional inquiry and follow up to determine if a more detailed assessment for that domain is necessary. On the subscales noted above, The raw scores should be summed to obtain a total raw score and identify the associated T-score

The T-scores are interpreted as follows:

Less than 55 = None to slight 55.0-59.9 = Mild 60.0-69.9 = Moderate 70 and over = Severe

12 weeks

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2016年5月13日

初级完成 (实际的)

2018年8月14日

研究完成 (实际的)

2018年8月14日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2018年10月9日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2018年11月6日

首次发布 (实际的)

2018年11月8日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2019年10月7日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2019年10月3日

最后验证

2019年10月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅