Comparison of Morbidity After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy for Acutely Inflamed Gall Bladder With and Without Drain
研究概览
详细说明
Most hospitals in Pakistan still do not have a policy of early laparoscopic cholecystectomy in acutely inflamed gallbladder, partly because of feared higher conversion rates to open procedure and presumed increased risk of complications. There are fewer local studies to elaborate the role of drain after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acutely inflamed gallbladder. This study was conducted to analyze the role of routine use of drains after laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acutely inflamed gallbladder. Does it offer any advantage in detecting bile leak or bleeding. Also to prove that placing drains prolongs the hospital stay and increases postoperative pain in comparison to patients in whom drain is not placed.
After being informed about the study and the potential risks, all patients giving written informed consent, underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy using conventional 4 port method. Patients were divided in two groups by lottery method. Group A - no drain group and Group B - drain group. Post operatively parameters of pain and total hospital stay were assessed and analysed.
研究类型
注册 (实际的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习地点
-
-
Federal Capital
-
Islamabad、Federal Capital、巴基斯坦、44790
- Shifa International Hospital
-
-
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
接受健康志愿者
有资格学习的性别
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- All the patients of either sex with ages between 20 - 80 years, diagnosed with acutely inflamed gallbladder, undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy were included in the study
Exclusion Criteria:
- All patients having concurrent operations on other organs, or with history of previous upper abdominal surgery, or with immunodeficiency states because of liver or renal transplantation or already diagnosed with HIV infection, or surgeries requiring open conversions, or surgeries in which there was hollow visceral organ injury, or patient requiring common bile duct (CBD) exploration or patients having any bleeding disorder, or surgeries where there is doubt of cystic duct stump or CBD injury, were excluded from the study
学习计划
研究是如何设计的?
设计细节
- 主要用途:支持治疗
- 分配:随机化
- 介入模型:并行分配
- 屏蔽:无(打开标签)
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
有源比较器:Drain Group
Suction drain was placed in sub hepatic region through 5 mm lateral trocar site.
|
Post operatively, in both arms including drain group and no drain group, parameters of pain was assessed by visual analog scale (VAS) from 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst pain), assessed at 1st postoperative day by the duty doctor or the nurse.
VAS > 3 was considered as post surgical pain.
The total number of hospital stay was noted from the day of operation till the day of discharge and discharge criteria was taken as a patient having pain as per VAS<3, no fever and tolerating oral intake
|
|
无干预:Without Drain Group
No drain was placed
|
研究衡量的是什么?
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Pain intensity
大体时间:1st post operative day
|
Pain was assessed by VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE (VAS) from 0 to 10, taking 0 SCORE FOR NO PAIN AND MAXIMUM 10 SCORE FOR WORST PAIN, assessed at 1st postoperative day by the duty doctor or the nurse.
VAS > 3 was considered as post surgical pain.
|
1st post operative day
|
|
Mean Hospital stay
大体时间:1st to 5th post operative day
|
Number of days from the day of operation till the day of discharge and discharge criteria was taken as a patient having pain as per VISUAL ANALOGUE SCALE <3 (0 SCORE FOR NO PAIN AND MAXIMUM 10 SCORE FOR WORST PAIN), no fever and tolerating oral intake.
|
1st to 5th post operative day
|
合作者和调查者
调查人员
- 首席研究员:Hira Saleem, FCPS Surgery、Shifa International Hospital
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (实际的)
初级完成 (实际的)
研究完成 (实际的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
其他研究编号
- Sheikh
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
在美国制造并从美国出口的产品
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.