Help Optimise and Mobilise Elders (H.O.M.E) (HOME)
2022年8月1日 更新者：JurongHealth
During hospitalisations, older inpatients commonly face issues such as immobility, loss of independence, and functional decline.
This leads them down the cascade of dependency with consequent increased risk of adverse outcomes, institutionalisation as well as higher post-acute care costs.
The investigators hypothesize that by implementing a mobility intervention in the inpatient setting, patients would be able to maintain their function upon discharge and avoid the cascade of dependency.
As such, the investigators aim to do this by implementing and evaluating a mobility intervention, while optimising reversible factors affecting mobility among inpatients admitted to a geriatric unit in Singapore.
The investigators will also examine the cost impact of a mobility focused model of care and also adopt the effectiveness-implementation hybrid Type 2 design where both effectiveness and implementation spheres are tested simultaneously.
研究概览
详细说明
Aim 1: To examine the effectiveness of multicomponent, mobility-focused model of care in reducing iatrogenic complications and improving patient outcomes. Adopting the Institute for Healthcare Improvement's (IHI) 4Ms framework ("Mobility", "Mentation, "Medication", and "What Matters"), the investigators will examine the effectiveness of timely and individually catered mobility interventions which not only increase mobilization but also optimize factors inhibiting mobility for elderly inpatients. It is hypothesized that the mobility outcomes, such as maximum distance walked and mobilization frequency will be significantly improved for patients who receive the intervention compared to those who receive standard care.
Aim 2: To examine the cost impact of a mobility-focused model of care. The investigators will examine whether the cost of these multicomponent, mobility-focused interventions can be offset from cost savings from early mobilisation benefits, by comparing healthcare utilization costs between-groups. Further to that, a cost effectiveness analysis will be performed should functional effectiveness be observed. For the primary cost impact objective, it is hypothesized that the cost savings arising from reduction in bed days of hospitalization and other medical costs incurred during study period will outweigh the cost of implementing this model of care. In addition, it is also hypothesized that the proposed intervention will be cost-effective through achieving better functional outcomes for patients, with lower costs required.
Aim 3: To evaluate the implementation outcomes of multicomponent, mobility-focused model of care in the process of this intervention. It is hypothesized that this intervention will have good acceptability, feasibility, penetration, implementation costs and sustainability.
研究类型
介入性
注册 (预期的)
90
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息，以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Melanie Tan Dr
- 电话号码：67165237
- 邮箱：melanie_tan@nuhs.edu.sg
学习地点
-
-
-
Singapore、新加坡、609606
- Ng Teng Fong Hospital
-
接触：
- Melanie Tan Dr
- 电话号码：67165237
- 邮箱：melanie_tan@nuhs.edu.sg
-
副研究员：
- Seok Mei Lim Dr
-
副研究员：
- Dina Ee Dr
-
副研究员：
- Weng Kin Lai
-
副研究员：
- Russell Yoong
-
副研究员：
- Lydia Au Dr
-
副研究员：
- Bing Kit Chan
-
Singapore、新加坡、768024
- Geriatrics Education and Research Institute
-
接触：
- Lau Lay Khoon Dr
- 电话号码：68078031
- 邮箱：lau.charlene.lk@geri.com.sg
-
副研究员：
- Tou Nien Xiang Dr
-
副研究员：
- Ding Yew Yoong Prof
-
副研究员：
- Michelle Jessica Pereira Dr
-
-
参与标准
研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人，称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
21年 至 110年 (成人、年长者)
接受健康志愿者
不
有资格学习的性别
全部
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- Newly admitted patients to the geriatric service
- Aged 75 years and above
- Mobile with or without the use of a walking aid
Exclusion Criteria:
- Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus (VRE) status
- Requires droplet or airborne precautions
- Critically ill
- Haemodynamically instability
- Requires more than 4-hourly parameters
- Systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg
- Heart rate >100beats/min
- Non-ambulant patients
- With advanced dementia (Functional Assessment Staging Scale [FAST] 7 dementia)
- Fulfills direct admission to another subspecialty unit
学习计划
本节提供研究计划的详细信息，包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：预防
- 分配：非随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：无（打开标签）
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：Intervention
Intervention group will receive a multicomponent, mobility-focused intervention during the course of inpatient admission.
|
The intervention group will receive early therapist review (within one working day of admission to HOME unit), to be mobilised at least three times a day.
They will also receive additional group exercise therapy sessions, as well as nurse screening for geriatric syndromes.
Besides that, they will be screened for 4Ms (Mobility, Mentation, Medication, What Matters) by doctor on admission.
|
|
无干预：Control
The control group will receive usual care as per current ward practice.
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in maximum distance walked
大体时间：Upon admission and at the point of discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
The total distance covered by the research participant (in meter)
|
Upon admission and at the point of discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
|
Mobilisation frequency
大体时间：Through the duration of admission
|
Number of times mobilised.
The average mobilisation frequency will be calculated by dividing the sum by the number of admission days.
|
Through the duration of admission
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in modified barthel score
大体时间：Upon admission, at discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay), and one-month post discharge
|
The score ranges from 0 to 100 with 0 as the worst outcome
|
Upon admission, at discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay), and one-month post discharge
|
|
Change in gait speed
大体时间：Upon admission and at discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
4 meter gait speed test (meter/second)
|
Upon admission and at discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
|
Inpatient length of stay and discharge location
大体时间：The duration of admission and upon discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
The duration of admission (days) and the location the respective participant is discharged to
|
The duration of admission and upon discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
|
Presence of common iatrogenic complications such as delirium, injurious falls, pressure ulcers, and venous thromboembolisms
大体时间：At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
Each of the complication will be measured in nominal scale; 0 denotes the absence of the complication while 1 denotes the presence of the complications.
The total number of complications arise will be calculated.
The greater the number indicates poorer outcome
|
At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
|
Gross amount of patient's bill during index admission, considering subsidy level
大体时间：At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
The total gross amount of participant's bill during index admission.
The subsidy level will be documented
|
At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
|
The intervention related costs for group therapy
大体时间：At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
The number of group therapy sessions attended by the participant multiply by the cost for one group therapy session.
The subsidy level will be documented.
|
At discharge (an average of 10 days after inclusion. Analysis will take into account the variability of length of stay)
|
其他结果措施
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Mortality
大体时间：1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
1 denotes survival while 0 denotes the participant passed away
|
1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
|
Readmission
大体时间：1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
The number of readmission due to the index admission within 30 days post discharged
|
1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
|
Healthcare utilisation data and associated costs
大体时间：1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
Number of visits (associated with index admission) to emergency department, specialist outpatient clinic, general practitioner and the associated costs within 30 days post-discharged
|
1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
|
Ambulatory status
大体时间：1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
Self-reported by the participant.
Four options: 0 denotes bed-bound, 1 denotes chair-bound, 2 denotes assisted (furniture cruiser, walking frame, rollator frame, quadstick, single point stick); 4 denotes independent
|
1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
|
Fall
大体时间：1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
0 denotes no fall; 1 denotes fall(s) occured (within 30days post-discharged)
|
1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
|
Utilisation of community resources
大体时间：1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
Self-reported by the participant: Five options: 0 denotes home care; 1 denotes day care; 2 denotes meals on wheels; 3 denotes medical escort service; 4 denotes home personal care
|
1-month follow-up post-discharge
|
合作者和调查者
在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。
赞助
调查人员
- 首席研究员：Melanie Tan Dr、Ng Teng Fong General Hospital
- 首席研究员：Lau Lay Khoon Dr、Geriatric Education and Research Institute
出版物和有用的链接
负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。
一般刊物
- Durlak JA, DuPre EP. Implementation matters: a review of research on the influence of implementation on program outcomes and the factors affecting implementation. Am J Community Psychol. 2008 Jun;41(3-4):327-50. doi: 10.1007/s10464-008-9165-0.
- Graham ID, Logan J, Harrison MB, Straus SE, Tetroe J, Caswell W, Robinson N. Lost in knowledge translation: time for a map? J Contin Educ Health Prof. 2006 Winter;26(1):13-24. doi: 10.1002/chp.47.
- Olson EV, Johnson BJ, Thompson LF. The hazards of immobility. 1967. Am J Nurs. 1990 Mar;90(3):43-8. No abstract available.
- Hirsch CH, Sommers L, Olsen A, Mullen L, Winograd CH. The natural history of functional morbidity in hospitalized older patients. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1990 Dec;38(12):1296-303. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1990.tb03451.x.
- Mate KS, Berman A, Laderman M, Kabcenell A, Fulmer T. Creating Age-Friendly Health Systems - A vision for better care of older adults. Healthc (Amst). 2018 Mar;6(1):4-6. doi: 10.1016/j.hjdsi.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
- Surkan MJ, Gibson W. Interventions to Mobilize Elderly Patients and Reduce Length of Hospital Stay. Can J Cardiol. 2018 Jul;34(7):881-888. doi: 10.1016/j.cjca.2018.04.033. Epub 2018 May 9.
- Smith TO, Sreekanta A, Walkeden S, Penhale B, Hanson S. Interventions for reducing hospital-associated deconditioning: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Arch Gerontol Geriatr. 2020 Sep-Oct;90:104176. doi: 10.1016/j.archger.2020.104176. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
- Murray ME, Wells TJ, Callen BL. Hospital resource utilization and functional decline of geriatric patients. Nurs Econ. 2003 May-Jun;21(3):114-9. No abstract available.
- Loyd C, Markland AD, Zhang Y, Fowler M, Harper S, Wright NC, Carter CS, Buford TW, Smith CH, Kennedy R, Brown CJ. Prevalence of Hospital-Associated Disability in Older Adults: A Meta-analysis. J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2020 Apr;21(4):455-461.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.jamda.2019.09.015. Epub 2019 Nov 14.
- Wu HY, Sahadevan S, Ding YY. Factors associated with functional decline of hospitalised older persons following discharge from an acute geriatric unit. Ann Acad Med Singap. 2006 Jan;35(1):17-23.
- Boyd CM, Landefeld CS, Counsell SR, Palmer RM, Fortinsky RH, Kresevic D, Burant C, Covinsky KE. Recovery of activities of daily living in older adults after hospitalization for acute medical illness. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2171-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02023.x.
- Inouye SK, Bogardus ST Jr, Baker DI, Leo-Summers L, Cooney LM Jr. The Hospital Elder Life Program: a model of care to prevent cognitive and functional decline in older hospitalized patients. Hospital Elder Life Program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2000 Dec;48(12):1697-706. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2000.tb03885.x.
- Liu B, Moore JE, Almaawiy U, Chan WH, Khan S, Ewusie J, Hamid JS, Straus SE; MOVE ON Collaboration. Outcomes of Mobilisation of Vulnerable Elders in Ontario (MOVE ON): a multisite interrupted time series evaluation of an implementation intervention to increase patient mobilisation. Age Ageing. 2018 Jan 1;47(1):112-119. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afx128.
- Hastings SN, Sloane R, Morey MC, Pavon JM, Hoenig H. Assisted early mobility for hospitalized older veterans: preliminary data from the STRIDE program. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2014 Nov;62(11):2180-4. doi: 10.1111/jgs.13095. Epub 2014 Oct 30.
- Hastings SN, Choate AL, Mahanna EP, Floegel TA, Allen KD, Van Houtven CH, Wang V. Early Mobility in the Hospital: Lessons Learned from the STRIDE Program. Geriatrics (Basel). 2018 Dec;3(4):61. doi: 10.3390/geriatrics3040061. Epub 2018 Sep 26.
- Smart DA, Dermody G, Coronado ME, Wilson M. Mobility Programs for the Hospitalized Older Adult: A Scoping Review. Gerontol Geriatr Med. 2018 Nov 1;4:2333721418808146. doi: 10.1177/2333721418808146. eCollection 2018 Jan-Dec.
- Hoyer EH, Friedman M, Lavezza A, Wagner-Kosmakos K, Lewis-Cherry R, Skolnik JL, Byers SP, Atanelov L, Colantuoni E, Brotman DJ, Needham DM. Promoting mobility and reducing length of stay in hospitalized general medicine patients: A quality-improvement project. J Hosp Med. 2016 May;11(5):341-7. doi: 10.1002/jhm.2546. Epub 2016 Feb 5.
- Lim SH, Ang SY, Ong HK, Lee TZY, Lee TXL, Luo EZ, Thilarajah S. Promotion of mobility among hospitalised older adults: An exploratory study on perceptions of patients, carers and nurses. Geriatr Nurs. 2020 Sep-Oct;41(5):608-614. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2020.03.015. Epub 2020 Apr 5.
- Chan EY, Samsudin SA, Lim YJ. Older patients' perception of engagement in functional self-care during hospitalization: A qualitative study. Geriatr Nurs. 2020 May - Jun;41(3):297-304. doi: 10.1016/j.gerinurse.2019.11.009. Epub 2019 Nov 29.
- Raymond MJ, Jeffs KJ, Winter A, Soh SE, Hunter P, Holland AE. The effects of a high-intensity functional exercise group on clinical outcomes in hospitalised older adults: an assessor-blinded, randomised-controlled trial. Age Ageing. 2017 Mar 1;46(2):208-213. doi: 10.1093/ageing/afw215.
- Wallin M, Talvitie U, Cattan M, Karppi SL. Construction of group exercise sessions in geriatric inpatient rehabilitation. Health Commun. 2008;23(3):245-52. doi: 10.1080/10410230802055349.
- Renner CIe, Outermans J, Ludwig R, Brendel C, Kwakkel G, Hummelsheim H. Group therapy task training versus individual task training during inpatient stroke rehabilitation: a randomised controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Jul;30(7):637-48. doi: 10.1177/0269215515600206. Epub 2015 Aug 27.
- Kongkasuwan R, Voraakhom K, Pisolayabutra P, Maneechai P, Boonin J, Kuptniratsaikul V. Creative art therapy to enhance rehabilitation for stroke patients: a randomized controlled trial. Clin Rehabil. 2016 Oct;30(10):1016-1023. doi: 10.1177/0269215515607072. Epub 2015 Sep 22.
- Proctor E, Silmere H, Raghavan R, Hovmand P, Aarons G, Bunger A, Griffey R, Hensley M. Outcomes for implementation research: conceptual distinctions, measurement challenges, and research agenda. Adm Policy Ment Health. 2011 Mar;38(2):65-76. doi: 10.1007/s10488-010-0319-7.
- Lavis JN, Lomas J, Hamid M, Sewankambo NK. Assessing country-level efforts to link research to action. Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Aug;84(8):620-8. doi: 10.2471/blt.06.030312. Erratum In: Bull World Health Organ. 2006 Oct;84(10):840.
研究记录日期
这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查，以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。
研究主要日期
学习开始 (预期的)
2022年7月25日
初级完成 (预期的)
2023年1月31日
研究完成 (预期的)
2023年9月30日
研究注册日期
首次提交
2022年6月25日
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
2022年8月1日
首次发布 (实际的)
2022年8月2日
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
2022年8月2日
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
2022年8月1日
最后验证
2022年6月1日
更多信息
与本研究相关的术语
关键字
其他相关的 MeSH 术语
其他研究编号
- GERI1627
计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)
计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)？
是的
IPD 计划说明
Working together with Geriatric Education and Research Institute and National Healthcare Group (Health Services & Outcomes Research).
IPD 共享时间框架
During study period.
IPD 共享访问标准
Via secure platforms (files to be encrypted with password).
For the purposes of data sharing and data analysis.
IPD 共享支持信息类型
- 研究协议
- 统计分析计划 (SAP)
- 知情同意书 (ICF)
- 临床研究报告（CSR）
- 解析代码
药物和器械信息、研究文件
研究美国 FDA 监管的药品
不
研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品
不
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.