此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Hybrid Episiotomy Training and Student Outcomes

2026年5月6日 更新者:Atlas University

Effects of a Hybrid Episiotomy Repair Training Model on Midwifery Students' Self-Efficacy, Anxiety and Cognitive Load

The goal of this clinical trial is to evaluate the effects of a hybrid episiotomy repair training model on self-efficacy, anxiety, and cognitive load in third-year midwifery students. The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does standardized sponge-based training improve students' episiotomy skills self-efficacy and cognitive load? Is there a difference between chicken tissue-based training and virtual reality-based training in terms of self-efficacy, anxiety, and cognitive load outcomes?

Researchers will compare chicken tissue-based training and virtual reality-based training to determine whether there are differences in educational outcomes between these two advanced simulation methods.

Participants will:

  • complete baseline assessments of anxiety, self-efficacy, and cognitive load,
  • receive standardized episiotomy repair training using a sponge model,
  • be randomly assigned to either chicken tissue-based hands-on training or virtual reality-based video training,
  • complete post-training assessments following each training phase.

研究概览

详细说明

This study is a randomized comparative educational intervention designed to evaluate the effects of a hybrid episiotomy repair training model on midwifery students' self-efficacy, anxiety levels, and cognitive load. Episiotomy repair is a technically demanding clinical skill that is difficult to practice in real clinical settings due to its invasive nature and limited opportunities for hands-on experience. Therefore, simulation-based training methods are essential to support skill acquisition in a safe and controlled learning environment.

The study was conducted with third-year midwifery students enrolled in the Department of Midwifery at Istanbul Atlas University during the 2025-2026 academic year. A total of 51 students who met the inclusion criteria and provided informed consent participated in the study. All participants first received standardized theoretical and practical training on episiotomy repair using sponge models to establish baseline psychomotor competence.

Following this initial phase, participants were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to one of two advanced training groups using a computer-generated randomization sequence. The first group received hands-on training using chicken tissue, which provides a more realistic tactile simulation of human perineal tissue. The second group received non-interactive virtual reality-based video training, designed to enhance cognitive and visual understanding of the episiotomy repair procedure.

Data were collected at three time points: before the training (baseline), after the standardized sponge-based training, and after completion of the assigned advanced training intervention. The primary outcomes included episiotomy skills self-efficacy, anxiety levels, and cognitive load. Self-efficacy was assessed using the Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy Scale (ESSES), anxiety levels were measured using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI), and cognitive load was evaluated using the Different Types of Cognitive Load Scale (DTCLS).

The study aims to determine whether standardized sponge-based training improves students' learning outcomes and to compare the effectiveness of chicken tissue-based training and virtual reality-based training in reinforcing these outcomes. The findings are expected to contribute to the development of evidence-based educational strategies in midwifery education by identifying effective and feasible simulation-based training models for teaching episiotomy repair skills.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

51

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a third-year midwifery student
  • Having completed theoretical education on episiotomy and perineal repair
  • Voluntary agreement to participate in the study
  • Providing written informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Having previously performed episiotomy repair actively in a clinical setting
  • Having any physical condition that may affect surgical hand skills
  • Not attending any of the training sessions during the study
  • Not completing the data collection process

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Chicken Tissue-Based Episiotomy Repair Training
Participants in this arm received standardized episiotomy repair training using sponge models, followed by hands-on episiotomy repair practice on chicken tissue under instructor supervision. Final assessments of self-efficacy, anxiety, and cognitive load were conducted after completion of the training.
Standardized theoretical and practical training on episiotomy repair using sponge models to establish baseline psychomotor skills.
Hands-on episiotomy repair training using chicken tissue to provide realistic tactile practice under instructor supervision.
实验性的:Virtual Reality-Based Episiotomy Repair Training
Participants in this arm received standardized episiotomy repair training using sponge models, followed by non-interactive virtual reality-based video training demonstrating episiotomy repair procedures. Final assessments of self-efficacy, anxiety, and cognitive load were conducted after completion of the training.
Standardized theoretical and practical training on episiotomy repair using sponge models to establish baseline psychomotor skills.
Non-interactive virtual reality-based video training demonstrating episiotomy repair procedures to support cognitive and visual learning.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Episiotomy Skills Self-Efficacy
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after training
Scores range from 19 to 76, with higher scores indicating greater self-efficacy in episiotomy repair skills.
Baseline and immediately after training

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Anxiety (STAI)
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after training
Scores range from 20 to 80 for each subscale, with higher scores indicating higher levels of anxiety.
Baseline and immediately after training
Cognitive Load (DTCLS)
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after training
The scale assesses intrinsic, extraneous, and germane cognitive load using a Likert-type format, with higher scores indicating higher perceived cognitive load.
Baseline and immediately after training

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Ece NİLÜFER, MSc Candidate、Atlas University
  • 研究主任:Meserret ASLAN, PhD Candidate、Atlas University
  • 学习椅:Gülay RATHFISCH、Atlas University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年12月30日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年1月28日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年2月25日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月6日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月6日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月12日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月12日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月6日

最后验证

2026年1月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • E-22686390-050.99-87329

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅