此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

AI-Based Video Analysis for Motor Development Assessment in Children (AMD-AI)

2026年5月15日 更新者:Abdullah Furkan Cangi、Medipol University

Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Assessing Motor Development in Children Using Video Analysis

This is a non-interventional, prospective observational study aimed at developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based system for assessing motor development in children using video analysis. Children aged 5 to 10 years will perform standardized motor tasks, which will be recorded under controlled conditions. The recorded videos will be analyzed using computer vision and deep learning techniques to extract movement patterns.

The results of the AI-based analysis will be compared with standardized motor assessment scores obtained from the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition - Short Form (BOT-2 SF). Participants will be classified into typical and atypical motor development groups based on BOT-2 scores. The primary objective is to evaluate the classification performance of the AI model. Secondary analyses will examine the relationship between AI predictions and continuous motor performance scores.

The study is designed to explore whether motor development can be assessed objectively without direct clinical testing, using only short video recordings. The findings may contribute to the development of scalable and accessible digital screening tools for early identification of motor development differences in children.

研究概览

详细说明

This study is a prospective, non-interventional observational study conducted to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based system for the assessment of motor development in children. The study includes children aged between 5 and 10 years who have no previously diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic disorders.

All participants will complete the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition - Short Form (BOT-2 SF), which will serve as the reference standard for motor performance. Based on BOT-2 scores, participants will be categorized into typical and atypical motor development groups using predefined thresholds derived from normative data and statistical distribution methods.

In addition to standardized testing, participants will perform a series of structured motor tasks, including jumping jacks, tandem walking, skipping, single-leg balance, finger-to-nose coordination, and protective extension responses. These tasks will be recorded using high-resolution video under controlled environmental conditions.

Video data will be processed using computer vision pipelines. Skeletal keypoints will be extracted using pose estimation models, and silhouette segmentation will be obtained using deep learning-based segmentation models. Extracted features will be normalized and used as input for machine learning and deep learning architectures, including transformer-based models and graph-based networks.

The primary outcome is the classification performance of the AI model in distinguishing typical versus atypical motor development profiles, evaluated using metrics such as ROC-AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and balanced accuracy. Secondary outcomes include regression performance for predicting continuous motor scores, evaluated using MAE, RMSE, and R-squared values.

Inter-rater reliability of expert evaluations will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additional analyses will include error distribution examination and Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement between AI predictions and standardized test scores.

This study does not involve any intervention, treatment, or risk beyond standard observational procedures. All participants are healthy volunteers, and informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians. The study has been approved by the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

60

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子

接受健康志愿者

是的

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

The study population consists of children aged 5 to 10 years recruited from schools and clinical settings. All participants are typically developing individuals without prior diagnoses, and they are evaluated to identify variations in motor development patterns using standardized testing and video-based analysis.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged between 5 and 10 years
  • No diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic disorders
  • Ability to follow verbal instructions
  • Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians
  • No prior participation in sensory integration therapy or special education programs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic conditions (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, epilepsy)
  • Visual or hearing impairments affecting task performance
  • Severe attention or behavioral problems preventing test completion
  • Physical limitations preventing participation in motor tasks

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Typical Motor Development
Children classified as having typical motor development based on BOT-2 scores. This group represents the control group for comparison with atypical motor development profiles.
This study does not include any therapeutic or experimental intervention. The procedures are limited to observational assessment and data collection. Participants perform standardized motor tasks and are video recorded under controlled conditions. No treatment, training, or behavioral modification is applied. The collected data are analyzed using artificial intelligence-based methods to evaluate motor development patterns.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
AI-Based Classification Accuracy of Motor Development
大体时间:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Classification accuracy of the artificial intelligence model in distinguishing typical versus atypical motor development based on video analysis, using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total score as the reference standard. BOT-2 SF scores range from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating better motor proficiency.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Correlation Between AI Predictions and BOT-2 Scores
大体时间:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Statistical relationship between artificial intelligence-generated motor development predictions and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores. BOT-2 SF scores range from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating better motor proficiency.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Mean Absolute Error of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction
大体时间:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Mean absolute error (MAE) of the artificial intelligence model in predicting continuous motor development scores based on video analysis, compared with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Root Mean Square Error of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction
大体时间:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Root mean square error (RMSE) of the artificial intelligence model in predicting continuous motor development scores based on video analysis, compared with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)
R-Squared Performance of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction
大体时间:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Coefficient of determination (R-squared) for the artificial intelligence model in predicting continuous motor development scores based on video analysis, compared with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

出版物和有用的链接

负责输入研究信息的人员自愿提供这些出版物。这些可能与研究有关。

有用的网址

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年1月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年8月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年9月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年4月29日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月15日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月19日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月19日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月15日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • AMD-2026-01

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅