このページは自動翻訳されたものであり、翻訳の正確性は保証されていません。を参照してください。 英語版 ソーステキスト用。

AI-Based Video Analysis for Motor Development Assessment in Children (AMD-AI)

2026年5月15日 更新者:Abdullah Furkan Cangi、Medipol University

Development and Validation of an Artificial Intelligence-Based System for Assessing Motor Development in Children Using Video Analysis

This is a non-interventional, prospective observational study aimed at developing and validating an artificial intelligence-based system for assessing motor development in children using video analysis. Children aged 5 to 10 years will perform standardized motor tasks, which will be recorded under controlled conditions. The recorded videos will be analyzed using computer vision and deep learning techniques to extract movement patterns.

The results of the AI-based analysis will be compared with standardized motor assessment scores obtained from the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition - Short Form (BOT-2 SF). Participants will be classified into typical and atypical motor development groups based on BOT-2 scores. The primary objective is to evaluate the classification performance of the AI model. Secondary analyses will examine the relationship between AI predictions and continuous motor performance scores.

The study is designed to explore whether motor development can be assessed objectively without direct clinical testing, using only short video recordings. The findings may contribute to the development of scalable and accessible digital screening tools for early identification of motor development differences in children.

調査の概要

詳細な説明

This study is a prospective, non-interventional observational study conducted to develop and validate an artificial intelligence-based system for the assessment of motor development in children. The study includes children aged between 5 and 10 years who have no previously diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic disorders.

All participants will complete the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition - Short Form (BOT-2 SF), which will serve as the reference standard for motor performance. Based on BOT-2 scores, participants will be categorized into typical and atypical motor development groups using predefined thresholds derived from normative data and statistical distribution methods.

In addition to standardized testing, participants will perform a series of structured motor tasks, including jumping jacks, tandem walking, skipping, single-leg balance, finger-to-nose coordination, and protective extension responses. These tasks will be recorded using high-resolution video under controlled environmental conditions.

Video data will be processed using computer vision pipelines. Skeletal keypoints will be extracted using pose estimation models, and silhouette segmentation will be obtained using deep learning-based segmentation models. Extracted features will be normalized and used as input for machine learning and deep learning architectures, including transformer-based models and graph-based networks.

The primary outcome is the classification performance of the AI model in distinguishing typical versus atypical motor development profiles, evaluated using metrics such as ROC-AUC, accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, F1-score, and balanced accuracy. Secondary outcomes include regression performance for predicting continuous motor scores, evaluated using MAE, RMSE, and R-squared values.

Inter-rater reliability of expert evaluations will be assessed using intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Additional analyses will include error distribution examination and Bland-Altman analysis to assess agreement between AI predictions and standardized test scores.

This study does not involve any intervention, treatment, or risk beyond standard observational procedures. All participants are healthy volunteers, and informed consent will be obtained from parents or legal guardians. The study has been approved by the Istanbul Medipol University Non-Interventional Clinical Research Ethics Committee.

研究の種類

観察的

入学 (推定)

60

連絡先と場所

このセクションには、調査を実施する担当者の連絡先の詳細と、この調査が実施されている場所に関する情報が記載されています。

研究連絡先

研究場所

参加基準

研究者は、適格基準と呼ばれる特定の説明に適合する人を探します。これらの基準のいくつかの例は、人の一般的な健康状態または以前の治療です。

適格基準

就学可能な年齢

健康ボランティアの受け入れ

はい

サンプリング方法

非確率サンプル

調査対象母集団

The study population consists of children aged 5 to 10 years recruited from schools and clinical settings. All participants are typically developing individuals without prior diagnoses, and they are evaluated to identify variations in motor development patterns using standardized testing and video-based analysis.

説明

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Children aged between 5 and 10 years
  • No diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic disorders
  • Ability to follow verbal instructions
  • Informed consent obtained from parents or legal guardians
  • No prior participation in sensory integration therapy or special education programs

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed neurological, developmental, or orthopedic conditions (e.g., autism spectrum disorder, cerebral palsy, epilepsy)
  • Visual or hearing impairments affecting task performance
  • Severe attention or behavioral problems preventing test completion
  • Physical limitations preventing participation in motor tasks

研究計画

このセクションでは、研究がどのように設計され、研究が何を測定しているかなど、研究計画の詳細を提供します。

研究はどのように設計されていますか?

デザインの詳細

コホートと介入

グループ/コホート
介入・治療
Typical Motor Development
Children classified as having typical motor development based on BOT-2 scores. This group represents the control group for comparison with atypical motor development profiles.
This study does not include any therapeutic or experimental intervention. The procedures are limited to observational assessment and data collection. Participants perform standardized motor tasks and are video recorded under controlled conditions. No treatment, training, or behavioral modification is applied. The collected data are analyzed using artificial intelligence-based methods to evaluate motor development patterns.

この研究は何を測定していますか?

主要な結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
AI-Based Classification Accuracy of Motor Development
時間枠:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Classification accuracy of the artificial intelligence model in distinguishing typical versus atypical motor development based on video analysis, using the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total score as the reference standard. BOT-2 SF scores range from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating better motor proficiency.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)

二次結果の測定

結果測定
メジャーの説明
時間枠
Correlation Between AI Predictions and BOT-2 Scores
時間枠:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Statistical relationship between artificial intelligence-generated motor development predictions and Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores. BOT-2 SF scores range from 0 to 88, with higher scores indicating better motor proficiency.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Mean Absolute Error of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction
時間枠:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Mean absolute error (MAE) of the artificial intelligence model in predicting continuous motor development scores based on video analysis, compared with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Root Mean Square Error of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction
時間枠:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Root mean square error (RMSE) of the artificial intelligence model in predicting continuous motor development scores based on video analysis, compared with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)
R-Squared Performance of AI-Based Motor Score Prediction
時間枠:Baseline assessment (Day 1)
Coefficient of determination (R-squared) for the artificial intelligence model in predicting continuous motor development scores based on video analysis, compared with Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency, Second Edition Short Form (BOT-2 SF) total scores.
Baseline assessment (Day 1)

協力者と研究者

ここでは、この調査に関係する人々や組織を見つけることができます。

スポンサー

出版物と役立つリンク

研究に関する情報を入力する責任者は、自発的にこれらの出版物を提供します。これらは、研究に関連するあらゆるものに関するものである可能性があります。

便利なリンク

研究記録日

これらの日付は、ClinicalTrials.gov への研究記録と要約結果の提出の進捗状況を追跡します。研究記録と報告された結果は、国立医学図書館 (NLM) によって審査され、公開 Web サイトに掲載される前に、特定の品質管理基準を満たしていることが確認されます。

主要日程の研究

研究開始 (実際)

2026年1月1日

一次修了 (推定)

2026年8月1日

研究の完了 (推定)

2026年9月1日

試験登録日

最初に提出

2026年4月29日

QC基準を満たした最初の提出物

2026年5月15日

最初の投稿 (実際)

2026年5月19日

学習記録の更新

投稿された最後の更新 (実際)

2026年5月19日

QC基準を満たした最後の更新が送信されました

2026年5月15日

最終確認日

2026年5月1日

詳しくは

本研究に関する用語

その他の研究ID番号

  • AMD-2026-01

個々の参加者データ (IPD) の計画

個々の参加者データ (IPD) を共有する予定はありますか?

未定

医薬品およびデバイス情報、研究文書

米国FDA規制医薬品の研究

いいえ

米国FDA規制機器製品の研究

いいえ

この情報は、Web サイト clinicaltrials.gov から変更なしで直接取得したものです。研究の詳細を変更、削除、または更新するリクエストがある場合は、register@clinicaltrials.gov。 までご連絡ください。 clinicaltrials.gov に変更が加えられるとすぐに、ウェブサイトでも自動的に更新されます。

Motor Development Assessmentの臨床試験

Observational Assessment Onlyの臨床試験

購読する