此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Prediction of Local Anaesthetic Dosing During Labour Epidural Analgesia (DIANA)

2026年5月22日 更新者:ZANFINI BRUNO ANTONIO、Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Prediction of Local Anaesthetic Dosing During Labour Epidural Analgesia: a Machine-learning Approach. The DIANA (Dosing Intrapartum ANAesthetics) Study.

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for controlling labour pain. However, labour pain happens during neuraxial analgesia, due to anaesthetic, obstetric, maternal factors.

The investigators hypothesized that relevant variables, able to predict the local anaesthetic (LA) requirement during labour, can be identified at admission and each parturient may therefore be accordingly classified in "low-requirement" and "high-requirement". In this way, a predictive score may be developed, and the analgesic regimen may be matched to the individual patient, thus ensuring a timely and appropriate treatment of patients likely to require higher doses of LA, while minimizing potentially side effects of excessive treatment in the low-dose group.

研究概览

地位

尚未招聘

条件

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

12500

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

    • RM
      • Rome、RM、意大利、00168
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

All parturients who delivered via vaginal route or intrapartum caesarean section and received neuraxial analgesia (epidural analgesia (EA) or combined spinal-epidural [CSE] analgesia or dural puncture epidural (DPE)) in Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, between January 1st, 2020 and March 01th, 2026 (including follow-up data), meeting the inclusion criteria.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parturients receiving neuraxial analgesia for labour, as clinical practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned caesarean delivery

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
All parturients between January 2020 and March 2026
All parturients who delivered via vaginal route or intrapartum caesarean section and received neuraxial analgesia (epidural analgesia (EA) or combined spinal-epidural [CSE] analgesia or dural puncture epidural (DPE)) in Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, between January 1st, 2020 and March 01th, 2026 (including follow-up data), meeting the inclusion criteria. Labour analgesia was maintained through manual top-up boluses or PIEB (Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus).
A machine-learning prediction model will be developed to anticipate the parturient's requirement of LA at admission in the Labour Suite, according to demographic, obstetric and anaesthetic features ongoing before administration of the first epidural bolus.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Machine-learning algorithm able to predict the LA consumption
大体时间:From the epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To develop a machine-learning algorithm able to predict the mean hourly cumulative LA consumption administered via the epidural catheter from the catheter placement up to delivery, expressed as time-weighted LA consumption per hour (mg/h) in patients receiving top-up analgesia or the need for adjunctive rescue LA boluses in patients receiving PIEB (Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus) analgesia.
From the epidural catheter placement to delivery.

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Clinical score
大体时间:At admission in the Labour Suite and before the epidural catheter is placed
To develop a clinical score, based on the machine learning algorithm, with the aim of predicting the patient's LA requirement at admission, thus categorizing parturients as "low requirement" or "high requirement".
At admission in the Labour Suite and before the epidural catheter is placed
Time-dependent AUC of LA manual boluses
大体时间:From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare (between low- and high-requirement parturients) the time-dependent AUC of LA boluses (in case of analgesia maintenance through top-up) and the time-dependent AUC of adjunctive rescue LA boluses (in case of analgesia maintenance through PIEB)
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Total LA consumption
大体时间:From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the total LA consumption (mg), mean (+-SD)
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Ratio of time to first bolus demand to duration of labor
大体时间:From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the ratio of time to first bolus demand to duration of labor (%), mean (+-SD), in case of analgesia maintenance through top-up.
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Total demand of LA boluses
大体时间:From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the total demand of LA boluses, mean (+-SD), in case of analgesia maintenance through top-up.
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Total adjunctive rescue LA epidural boluses
大体时间:From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the total adjunctive rescue LA epidural boluses, mean (+-SD), in case of analgesia maintenance through PIEB.
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Length of active phase
大体时间:From start of the active phase to full cervical dilation, up to 24 hours.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the length of active phase in minutes, mean (+-SD).
From start of the active phase to full cervical dilation, up to 24 hours.
Length of second stage
大体时间:From full cervical dilation to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the length of second stage in minutes, mean (+-SD).
From full cervical dilation to delivery.
Rate of postpartum haemorrhage
大体时间:In the first hour after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of postpartum haemorrhage, expressed as percentage.
In the first hour after delivery.
Rate of perineal laceration
大体时间:In the first hour after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of perineal laceration, expressed as percentage.
In the first hour after delivery.
Rate of episiotomy
大体时间:At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of episiotomy, expressed as percentage.
At delivery.
Rate of shoulder dystocia
大体时间:At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of shoulder dystocia, expressed as percentage.
At delivery.
Rate of intrapartum caesarean section
大体时间:From admission to the Labour suite to delivery, up to 24 hours.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of intrapartum caesarean section, expressed as percentage.
From admission to the Labour suite to delivery, up to 24 hours.
Rate of catheter re-siting during labour
大体时间:From the placement of the first epidural catheter to delivery, up to 24 hours.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of catheter re-siting during labour, expressed as percentage.
From the placement of the first epidural catheter to delivery, up to 24 hours.
Rate of neonatal admission in NICU
大体时间:After delivery, up to 1 hour.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of neonatal admission in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
After delivery, up to 1 hour.
Mean Apgar Score at 1 minute
大体时间:1 minute after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the neonatal Apgar score at 1 minute, expressed as mean +- DS. The Apgar score is a 10-point evaluation scoring system used to assess a newborn's health immediately after birth, based on 5 criteria: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration. Each category is assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.
1 minute after delivery.
Mean Apgar Score at 5 minutes
大体时间:5 minutes after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes, expressed as mean +- DS. The Apgar score is a 10-point evaluation scoring system used to assess a newborn's health immediately after birth, based on 5 criteria: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration. Each category is assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.
5 minutes after delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Arterial pH
大体时间:At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord arterial pH, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord arterial pH is 7.2 - 7.4.
At delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Venous pH
大体时间:At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord venous pH, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord venous pH is 7.25 - 7.45.
At delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Arterial base excess
大体时间:At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord arterial base excess, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord arterial base excess is -9 to +2.
At delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Venous base excess
大体时间:At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord venous base excess, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord venous base excess is -10 to +0.
At delivery.
The rate of maternal hypertensive disorders.
大体时间:Throughout pregnancy, up to the first postpartum day.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of maternal hypertensive disorders.
Throughout pregnancy, up to the first postpartum day.
The rate of gestational diabetes.
大体时间:Throughout pregnancy, up to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of gestational diabetes.
Throughout pregnancy, up to delivery.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年6月13日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年9月30日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年10月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月8日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月22日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年5月29日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年5月29日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月22日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅