Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Prediction of Local Anaesthetic Dosing During Labour Epidural Analgesia (DIANA)

22. Mai 2026 aktualisiert von: ZANFINI BRUNO ANTONIO, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Prediction of Local Anaesthetic Dosing During Labour Epidural Analgesia: a Machine-learning Approach. The DIANA (Dosing Intrapartum ANAesthetics) Study.

Epidural analgesia is the gold standard for controlling labour pain. However, labour pain happens during neuraxial analgesia, due to anaesthetic, obstetric, maternal factors.

The investigators hypothesized that relevant variables, able to predict the local anaesthetic (LA) requirement during labour, can be identified at admission and each parturient may therefore be accordingly classified in "low-requirement" and "high-requirement". In this way, a predictive score may be developed, and the analgesic regimen may be matched to the individual patient, thus ensuring a timely and appropriate treatment of patients likely to require higher doses of LA, while minimizing potentially side effects of excessive treatment in the low-dose group.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Bedingungen

Intervention / Behandlung

Studientyp

Beobachtungs

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

12500

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

  • Italien
    • RM
      • Rome, RM, Italien, 00168
        • Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Probenahmeverfahren

Nicht-Wahrscheinlichkeitsprobe

Studienpopulation

All parturients who delivered via vaginal route or intrapartum caesarean section and received neuraxial analgesia (epidural analgesia (EA) or combined spinal-epidural [CSE] analgesia or dural puncture epidural (DPE)) in Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, between January 1st, 2020 and March 01th, 2026 (including follow-up data), meeting the inclusion criteria.

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Parturients receiving neuraxial analgesia for labour, as clinical practice

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Planned caesarean delivery

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

Kohorten und Interventionen

Gruppe / Kohorte
Intervention / Behandlung
All parturients between January 2020 and March 2026
All parturients who delivered via vaginal route or intrapartum caesarean section and received neuraxial analgesia (epidural analgesia (EA) or combined spinal-epidural [CSE] analgesia or dural puncture epidural (DPE)) in Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, between January 1st, 2020 and March 01th, 2026 (including follow-up data), meeting the inclusion criteria. Labour analgesia was maintained through manual top-up boluses or PIEB (Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus).
Sonstiges: Machine-learning prediction model
A machine-learning prediction model will be developed to anticipate the parturient's requirement of LA at admission in the Labour Suite, according to demographic, obstetric and anaesthetic features ongoing before administration of the first epidural bolus.

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Machine-learning algorithm able to predict the LA consumption
Zeitfenster: From the epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To develop a machine-learning algorithm able to predict the mean hourly cumulative LA consumption administered via the epidural catheter from the catheter placement up to delivery, expressed as time-weighted LA consumption per hour (mg/h) in patients receiving top-up analgesia or the need for adjunctive rescue LA boluses in patients receiving PIEB (Programmed Intermittent Epidural Bolus) analgesia.
From the epidural catheter placement to delivery.

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Clinical score
Zeitfenster: At admission in the Labour Suite and before the epidural catheter is placed
To develop a clinical score, based on the machine learning algorithm, with the aim of predicting the patient's LA requirement at admission, thus categorizing parturients as "low requirement" or "high requirement".
At admission in the Labour Suite and before the epidural catheter is placed
Time-dependent AUC of LA manual boluses
Zeitfenster: From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare (between low- and high-requirement parturients) the time-dependent AUC of LA boluses (in case of analgesia maintenance through top-up) and the time-dependent AUC of adjunctive rescue LA boluses (in case of analgesia maintenance through PIEB)
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Total LA consumption
Zeitfenster: From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the total LA consumption (mg), mean (+-SD)
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Ratio of time to first bolus demand to duration of labor
Zeitfenster: From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the ratio of time to first bolus demand to duration of labor (%), mean (+-SD), in case of analgesia maintenance through top-up.
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Total demand of LA boluses
Zeitfenster: From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the total demand of LA boluses, mean (+-SD), in case of analgesia maintenance through top-up.
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Total adjunctive rescue LA epidural boluses
Zeitfenster: From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the total adjunctive rescue LA epidural boluses, mean (+-SD), in case of analgesia maintenance through PIEB.
From epidural catheter placement to delivery.
Length of active phase
Zeitfenster: From start of the active phase to full cervical dilation, up to 24 hours.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the length of active phase in minutes, mean (+-SD).
From start of the active phase to full cervical dilation, up to 24 hours.
Length of second stage
Zeitfenster: From full cervical dilation to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the length of second stage in minutes, mean (+-SD).
From full cervical dilation to delivery.
Rate of postpartum haemorrhage
Zeitfenster: In the first hour after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of postpartum haemorrhage, expressed as percentage.
In the first hour after delivery.
Rate of perineal laceration
Zeitfenster: In the first hour after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of perineal laceration, expressed as percentage.
In the first hour after delivery.
Rate of episiotomy
Zeitfenster: At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of episiotomy, expressed as percentage.
At delivery.
Rate of shoulder dystocia
Zeitfenster: At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of shoulder dystocia, expressed as percentage.
At delivery.
Rate of intrapartum caesarean section
Zeitfenster: From admission to the Labour suite to delivery, up to 24 hours.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of intrapartum caesarean section, expressed as percentage.
From admission to the Labour suite to delivery, up to 24 hours.
Rate of catheter re-siting during labour
Zeitfenster: From the placement of the first epidural catheter to delivery, up to 24 hours.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of catheter re-siting during labour, expressed as percentage.
From the placement of the first epidural catheter to delivery, up to 24 hours.
Rate of neonatal admission in NICU
Zeitfenster: After delivery, up to 1 hour.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of neonatal admission in Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU).
After delivery, up to 1 hour.
Mean Apgar Score at 1 minute
Zeitfenster: 1 minute after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the neonatal Apgar score at 1 minute, expressed as mean +- DS. The Apgar score is a 10-point evaluation scoring system used to assess a newborn's health immediately after birth, based on 5 criteria: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration. Each category is assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.
1 minute after delivery.
Mean Apgar Score at 5 minutes
Zeitfenster: 5 minutes after delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the neonatal Apgar score at 5 minutes, expressed as mean +- DS. The Apgar score is a 10-point evaluation scoring system used to assess a newborn's health immediately after birth, based on 5 criteria: Appearance, Pulse, Grimace, Activity, and Respiration. Each category is assigned a score of 0, 1 or 2.
5 minutes after delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Arterial pH
Zeitfenster: At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord arterial pH, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord arterial pH is 7.2 - 7.4.
At delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Venous pH
Zeitfenster: At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord venous pH, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord venous pH is 7.25 - 7.45.
At delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Arterial base excess
Zeitfenster: At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord arterial base excess, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord arterial base excess is -9 to +2.
At delivery.
Mean Umbilical Cord Venous base excess
Zeitfenster: At delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the umbilical cord venous base excess, expressed as mean +- DS. Reference ranges of cord venous base excess is -10 to +0.
At delivery.
The rate of maternal hypertensive disorders.
Zeitfenster: Throughout pregnancy, up to the first postpartum day.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of maternal hypertensive disorders.
Throughout pregnancy, up to the first postpartum day.
The rate of gestational diabetes.
Zeitfenster: Throughout pregnancy, up to delivery.
To compare between low- and high-requirement parturients the rate of gestational diabetes.
Throughout pregnancy, up to delivery.

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Sponsor

Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Agostino Gemelli IRCCS

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

13. Juni 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

30. September 2026

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Oktober 2026

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

8. Mai 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

22. Mai 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. Mai 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

29. Mai 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

22. Mai 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Mai 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Schlüsselwörter

Andere Studien-ID-Nummern

  • 27389

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Klinische Studien zur Wehenanalgesie

Klinische Studien zur Machine-learning prediction model

Suchen Sie nach ähnlichen Studien

Sponsoren und Mitarbeiter

Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

CROs by country

CROs in Japan

Bedingungen

Seltene Krankheiten

Drogeninterventionen

Nahrungsergänzungsmittel

Sponsor / Mitarbeiter

Standorte

Abonnieren