此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Dermocosmetic Evaluation of Propolis Ointments in Atopic-Prone Dry Skin (DEPRO)

2026年5月25日 更新者:Chadi Khatib、Manara University

Comparative Dermocosmetic Evaluation of Crude Propolis and Ethanolic Extract of Propolis Ointments in Subjects With Atopic-Prone Dry Skin: An Exploratory Randomized Double-Blind Vehicle-Controlled Parallel-Group Study

The goal of this clinical trial is to learn if propolis ointments work to improve dry, atopic-prone skin in adults. Propolis is a natural substance made by honeybees. It will also learn about the safety of these ointments.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does propolis ointment lower dryness, scaling, and roughness better than a base ointment with no propolis? Is there a difference between crude propolis and ethanolic extract of propolis (EEP)?

Researchers will compare three ointments to see if they improve skin condition:

A propolis ointment made with 3% ethanolic extract A propolis ointment made with 5% crude propolis A base ointment with no propolis (look-alike)

Participants will:

Apply the ointment to dry skin areas twice a day for 4 weeks Visit the clinic 4 times: for screening, at the start, at week 2, and at week 4 Have their skin checked by a researcher using a standard dryness score Answer questions about skin comfort, itching, and satisfaction Have a patch test before starting to check for allergy to propolis

研究概览

详细说明

This exploratory dermocosmetic study is a graduation project conducted by pharmacy students at Manara University in collaboration with the Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA). It evaluates two propolis-based ointments against a vehicle control in adults with atopic-prone dry skin.

STUDENT INVESTIGATORS:

Mahmoud Bitar, Haya Farhat, Nagham Saleh - supervised by Chadi Khatib, PhD, Faculty of Pharmacy, Manara University.

RATIONALE:

Atopic-prone dry skin presents with chronic dryness, scaling, roughness, mild itching, and impaired barrier function. In Syria and similar settings, topical corticosteroids are frequently used for minor skin conditions, often through over-the-counter combination products whose steroid content is not clearly labeled. This study addresses the need for evidence-based, non-steroidal alternatives for mild xerotic and atopic-prone skin.

INTERVENTIONS:

Three ointments are prepared under GMP-like conditions with identical packaging and appearance:

  1. EEP Ointment 3%: ethanolic extract of propolis (3%), white soft paraffin (67%), liquid paraffin (20%), anhydrous lanolin (10%)
  2. Crude Propolis Ointment 5%: micronized crude propolis (5%), white soft paraffin (65%), liquid paraffin (20%), anhydrous lanolin (10%)
  3. Vehicle Ointment: white soft paraffin (70%), liquid paraffin (20%), anhydrous lanolin (10%)

Propolis is standardized by total phenolic content, total flavonoid content, and HPLC fingerprinting (reference compounds: CAPE, artepillin C, galangin, pinocembrin).

DESIGN:

Randomized, double-blind, vehicle-controlled, parallel-group. Allocation ratio 1:1:1. Computer-generated block randomization.

POPULATION:

Adults aged 18-60 years with atopic-prone dry skin or mild xerotic condition. Exclusion: acute eczema, infected dermatitis, psoriasis, known propolis/honey/lanolin allergy, pregnancy, breastfeeding, recent systemic corticosteroids (2 weeks), immunosuppressants (4 weeks), biologics (3 months), topical corticosteroids (1 week), topical calcineurin inhibitors (1 week), phototherapy (2 weeks).

PROCEDURES:

  • Visit 0: Screening, 48-hour patch test (forearm or upper back), informed consent
  • Visit 1 (Week 0): Randomization, baseline clinical photography, dryness score
  • Visit 2 (Week 2): Safety and cosmetic evaluation
  • Visit 3 (Week 4): Final evaluation

OUTCOMES:

Primary: Change in clinical dryness score (5-point scale: 0=None, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe) from baseline to Week 4, assessing dryness, scaling, and roughness.

Secondary: Pruritus VAS (0-10), skin comfort (Likert 1-5), cosmetic acceptability, subject satisfaction (Likert 1-5), standardized clinical photography.

SAFETY:

Erythema, burning, stinging, edema, allergic dermatitis, irritation at each visit. Adverse events: mild (continue), moderate (monitor), severe (discontinue).

ANALYSIS:

Mixed-effects repeated measures model, Tukey post hoc, Fisher exact or Chi-square for categorical variables. Significance: p < 0.05. Software: SPSS, GraphPad Prism.

SAMPLE SIZE: 30 participants (10 per group).

COMPLIANCE: Package weighing, patient diary, usage frequency. Poor compliance: <80% adherence.

ETHICS: Declaration of Helsinki, GCP. Written informed consent. Approved by Biomedical Ethics Committee, Syrian Scientific Society for Medicinal Herbs (SHAMNA), approval SHAMNA-2026-027.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

30

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Latakia、叙利亚
        • Manara University, Faculty of Pharmacy

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults aged 18-60 years
  • Atopic-prone dry skin or mild xerotic skin condition
  • Mild-to-moderate skin dryness, scaling, roughness, and mild itching
  • No acute inflammatory skin disease
  • Ability to attend follow-up visits and comply with application instructions
  • Signed informed consent form

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known allergy to propolis, honey, or bee products
  • Known allergy to lanolin
  • Acute eczema flare, infected dermatitis, psoriasis, seborrheic dermatitis, fungal infections, herpes simplex, or scabies
  • Pregnancy or breastfeeding
  • Recent use of systemic corticosteroids (within 2 weeks)
  • Recent use of immunosuppressants (within 4 weeks)
  • Recent use of biologics (within 3 months)
  • Recent use of topical corticosteroids (within 1 week)
  • Recent use of topical calcineurin inhibitors (within 1 week)
  • Recent phototherapy (within 2 weeks)
  • Severe systemic diseases not under control
  • Poor compliance or inability to cooperate
  • Use of other skin products during the study period

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:四人间

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:EEP Ointment 3%
Ointment containing 3% ethanolic extract of propolis, white soft paraffin 67%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks.
3% ethanolic extract of propolis in ointment base
其他名称:
  • EEP
  • Propolis extract
  • Bee propolis extract
实验性的:Crude Propolis Ointment 5%
Ointment containing 5% micronized crude propolis, white soft paraffin 65%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks.
5% micronized crude propolis in ointment base
其他名称:
  • 蜂胶
  • Raw propolis
  • Natural propolis
  • Micronized propolis
安慰剂比较:Vehicle Ointment
Base ointment containing white soft paraffin 70%, liquid paraffin 20%, anhydrous lanolin 10%. No propolis. Applied twice daily for 4 weeks.
Ointment base without propolis
其他名称:
  • 安慰剂软膏
  • Base ointment
  • Control ointment
  • White soft paraffin base

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Clinical Dryness Score
大体时间:Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Clinical assessment of skin dryness, scaling, and roughness using a 5-point scale where 0=None, 1=Very mild, 2=Mild, 3=Moderate, 4=Severe. Lower scores indicate improvement.
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Pruritus Visual Analog Scale (VAS)
大体时间:Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4
Self-reported itching intensity on a 0-10 scale, where 0=no itching and 10=worst possible itching.
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Skin Comfort Assessment
大体时间:Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4
Self-reported assessment of skin tightness, burning, soothing sensation, and softness using a Likert scale (1=Very uncomfortable, 5=Very comfortable).
Baseline (Week 0), Week 2, and Week 4
Cosmetic Acceptability
大体时间:Week 2 and Week 4
Self-reported assessment of ointment spreadability, greasiness, absorption, texture, and ease of application.
Week 2 and Week 4
Subject Satisfaction Score
大体时间:Week 4
Overall satisfaction with treatment using a Likert scale (1=Very dissatisfied, 5=Very satisfied).
Week 4
Standardized Clinical Photography
大体时间:Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4
Digital photography of affected skin areas under standardized lighting, distance, angle, and camera settings at baseline and Week 4 for visual comparison.
Baseline (Week 0) and Week 4

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 研究主任:Mahmoud Bitar, BPharm St.、Manara University
  • 研究主任:Haya Farhat, BPharm St.、Manara University
  • 研究主任:Nagham Saleh, BPharm St.、Manara University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年4月15日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年5月24日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年6月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年5月25日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年5月25日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年5月25日

最后验证

2026年5月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

IPD 计划说明

De-identified individual participant data, study protocol, statistical analysis plan, and informed consent form will be shared with other researchers following publication of primary results. Clinical photographs will be excluded from shared datasets to protect participant privacy.

IPD 共享时间框架

Within 6 months following publication of primary results. Data will remain available indefinitely through the institutional repository.

IPD 共享访问标准

Available to researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal and agree to data use terms. Requests should be directed to the corresponding author at chadi.khatib@gmail.com

IPD 共享支持信息类型

  • 研究方案
  • 树液
  • 国际碳纤维联合会
  • 分析代码
  • 企业社会责任

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅