此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

POV Video and Mental Practice Training for Neonatal LMA Insertion

2026年6月25日 更新者:Cengizhan Yavuz、Kahramanmaras Sutcu Imam University

Combined Use of Point-of-View (POV) Video and Mental Practice Training Versus Standard Demonstration for Neonatal LMA Insertion by Novice Healthcare Professionals: A Prospective Randomized Simulation Study

This prospective, randomized, single-blind simulation study aims to evaluate and compare the educational efficacy of a hybrid instructional modality-combining point-of-view (POV) video training and structured mental practice (MP)-against standard instructor-led live demonstration for neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion training among novice healthcare professionals. Learning neonatal airway management skills presents unique educational and cognitive challenges, especially for non-physician providers who are frequently required to perform these high-stakes interventions during the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) curricula.

A total of 52 eligible healthcare professionals (including physicians, midwives, nurses, paramedics, and emergency medical technicians) with no prior neonatal LMA insertion experience will be prospectively enrolled and randomly allocated into two equal parallel groups (n=26 per group). Group A (Control) will receive a standard, step-by-step 5-minute live instructor demonstration on a high-fidelity term neonatal simulator. Group B (Intervention) will view a 3-minute standardized POV video captured from a first-person perspective via a head-mounted action camera worn by an expert instructor, immediately followed by a 1-minute structured mental rehearsal, with no live demonstration provided.

Following the respective educational interventions, all participants will individually perform the neonatal LMA insertion on the simulator in a separate room. A trained evaluator, who remains strictly blinded to the group assignments, will record the performance outcomes. The primary outcome measures are the objective total OSCE score (evaluated via a 22-item standardized checklist) and the physical procedural completion time in seconds. Secondary outcomes include first-attempt success rates, critical error rates, instances of excessive force application, airway trauma or procedural failure, and subjective cognitive workload dimensions assessed via the NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire. The findings will provide insights into scalable, cost-effective, and cognitively optimized learning models for integration into neonatal resuscitation training frameworks.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

52

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

      • Kahramanmaraş、土耳其(türkiye)、46100
        • Kahramanmaraş Sütçü İmam University, Faculty of Medicine

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Being a licensed healthcare professional (physicians, midwives, nurses, paramedics, or emergency medical technicians) currently participating in or eligible for the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) training.
  2. Having no prior practical, clinical, or simulator-based experience with neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion.
  3. Voluntarily consenting to participate in the study and complete all evaluation procedures (OSCE and NASA-TLX).

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Having previous hands-on experience or formal advanced training specifically in neonatal LMA stabilization or insertion.
  2. Declining to participate or failing to complete any phase of the allocated educational intervention or subsequent assessment.
  3. Having visual, auditory, or cognitive impairments that would interfere with viewing the point-of-view (POV) video or performing the structured mental practice.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:卫生服务研究
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
有源比较器:Group A - Standard Demonstration
Participants receive a standardized, step-by-step 5-minute live instructor demonstration of neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion on a high-fidelity term neonatal simulator, adhering to current Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines.
A 5-minute, step-by-step live instructor demonstration of neonatal LMA insertion on a simulator.
实验性的:Group B - POV Video + Mental Practice
Participants view a 3-minute standardized point-of-view (POV) video captured by a head-mounted action camera worn by an experienced instructor, displaying the LMA insertion from a first-person perspective with expert narration. Immediately after, participants perform a 1-minute structured mental rehearsal.
A 3-minute first-person point-of-view video combined with 1 minute of structured mental rehearsal.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) Score
大体时间:Immediately after the educational intervention (Day 1).
A 22-item standardized checklist specifically developed based on the Neonatal Resuscitation Program (NRP) guidelines to evaluate the technical proficiency of neonatal laryngeal mask airway (LMA) insertion. Each step is scored, and higher total scores indicate superior clinical performance.
Immediately after the educational intervention (Day 1).
Procedural Completion Time
大体时间:Immediately after the educational intervention (Day 1).
The total physical time measured in seconds from the moment the participant picks up the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) device until the successful placement and initial ventilation on the high-fidelity neonatal simulator.
Immediately after the educational intervention (Day 1).

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Subjective Workload (NASA-TLX Score)
大体时间:Immediately after the clinical performance assessment (Day 1).
The NASA Task Load Index (NASA-TLX) questionnaire will be used to evaluate the multidimensional subjective workload experienced by participants across 6 subscales: mental demand, physical demand, temporal demand, performance, effort, and frustration. Total score ranges from 0 to 100, where higher scores reflect higher cognitive and physical workload.
Immediately after the clinical performance assessment (Day 1).

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年6月15日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年6月19日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年6月19日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月25日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年6月25日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月1日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月1日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年6月25日

最后验证

2026年6月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • KSUEK-2026/18

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅