此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

DL Models Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error Based on Non-Cycloplegic Parameters in Myopic Adults

2026年7月7日 更新者:Jian Xiong、Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University

Efficacy of Deep Learning Models for Predicting Cycloplegic Refractive Error Based on Non-Cycloplegic Parameters in Adults With Myopia

This study presents a machine learning model that predicts cycloplegic refraction in adults with myopia using standard non-cycloplegic eye measurements, aiming to reduce the need for cycloplegic drops while still identifying patients who require them.

研究概览

详细说明

Myopia is a highly prevalent, irreversible refractive disorder with substantial impact on quality of life. Cycloplegic refraction is the gold standard for assessing refractive error in adults considering optical or surgical correction, but it is time-consuming, slow to recover from, and frequently associated with ocular discomfort. Non-cycloplegic refraction is therefore used routinely in clinical practice, despite known differences from cycloplegic values in a subset of adult myopes.

Critically, this discrepancy varies substantially between individuals and cannot be anticipated from non-cycloplegic measurements alone. Clinicians have no reliable way to identify, prior to dilation, which patients are likely to be overcorrected if cycloplegia is omitted, potentially leading to overcorrected prescriptions, asthenopia, and myopic progression.

Machine learning approaches that capture non-linear relationships between clinical predictors and refractive outcomes have shown promise in children, but comparable models for adults remain largely unexplored, and most rely on axial length, which is unavailable in routine optometric settings. Refractive surgery centers offer a uniquely suitable data source, as every candidate undergoes standardized paired non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic refraction with detailed anterior segment biometry during routine preoperative evaluation. This study leverages such data to develop and validate models estimating cycloplegic refractive error from non-cycloplegic parameters, providing a decision-support tool that reduces unnecessary cycloplegia while flagging patients for whom dilated refraction remains indicated.

研究类型

观察性的

注册 (估计的)

2500

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

研究联系人备份

学习地点

      • Jiangxi、中国
        • 招聘中
        • The Second Affiliated Hospital of Nanchang University, Nanchang, JiangXi 330000
        • 接触:
        • 接触:

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人

接受健康志愿者

不

取样方法

非概率样本

研究人群

Each subject underwent a comprehensive preoperative examination, including cycloplegic and non-cycloplegic refractions, Pentacam, etc.

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Age 18 to 60 years, of either sex;
  2. Spherical equivalent between -0.50 diopters and -10.00 diopters, with myopia in one or both eyes, and with cylinder of 4.00 diopters or less;
  3. Best-corrected visual acuity of 20/25 or better in each eye;
  4. Clear cornea, no keratoconus, corneal scarring, or other pathologies; clear lens;
  5. Intraocular pressure of 21 mmHg or less, with no history of glaucoma;
  6. No history of ocular surgery, especially corneal refractive surgery or cataract surgery;
  7. Time interval between non-cycloplegic refraction and cycloplegic refraction of 7 days or less, with complete data.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Incomplete clinical data to support the diagnosis;
  2. Ocular conditions such as subclinical keratoconus, keratoconus, or moderate-to-severe corneal haze or leukoma;
  3. Allergy or contraindication to cycloplegic agents;
  4. Refusal to participate in the study.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

队列和干预

团体/队列
干预/治疗
Group with spherical equivalent change ≥0.50 diopters after cycloplegic refraction
Adult myopes with a non-cycloplegic versus cycloplegic spherical equivalent difference of ≥0.50 diopters, for whom cycloplegic refraction is clinically warranted, received routine cycloplegic refraction with tropicamide; no other intervention was given.
The machine learning model was applied to each participant's non-cycloplegic parameters to predict cycloplegic spherical equivalent.
Group with spherical equivalent change <0.50 diopters after cycloplegic refraction
Adult myopes with an absolute difference of less than 0.50 diopters between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic spherical equivalent, for whom non-cycloplegic refraction is considered sufficient, received routine cycloplegic refraction with tropicamide; no additional intervention was applied.
The machine learning model was applied to each participant's non-cycloplegic parameters to predict cycloplegic spherical equivalent.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Accuracy of predicted cycloplegic spherical equivalent
大体时间:Day 0
Accuracy of the machine learning model in predicting cycloplegic spherical equivalent in the validation dataset, evaluated by mean absolute error, root mean square error, and coefficient of determination, expressed for spherical equivalent in diopters.
Day 0

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Diagnostic performance for identifying patients requiring cycloplegic refraction
大体时间:Day 0
Area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, sensitivity, and specificity of the model for classifying patients with an absolute difference of 0.50 diopters or more between non-cycloplegic and cycloplegic spherical equivalent in the validation dataset.
Day 0
Agreement between predicted and measured cycloplegic refraction
大体时间:Day 0
Agreement between predicted and measured cycloplegic spherical equivalent assessed by Bland-Altman analysis with mean bias and 95% limits of agreement, and by the intraclass correlation coefficient in the validation dataset.
Day 0

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2023年10月3日

初级完成 (估计的)

2026年11月25日

研究完成 (估计的)

2026年11月25日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年6月21日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年7月5日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年7月8日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年7月9日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年7月7日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他相关的 MeSH 术语

其他研究编号

  • [2026] NO.(123)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅