此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

The Effect of Creative Drama Education on Nursing Students' Reflective Thinking and Clinical Decision-Making: A Mixed-Methods Study

2026年8月3日 更新者:Tugce Kabak Solak、Agri Ibrahim Cecen University
This randomized controlled mixed-methods study evaluated the effect of creative drama education on nursing students' reflective thinking and clinical decision-making skills. Participants were randomly assigned to either an experimental group receiving creative drama education (n = 40) or a control group participating in case-based discussion sessions (n = 37). Quantitative data were collected before and after the intervention using validated measurement instruments. Following completion of the intervention, qualitative interviews were conducted with participants from the experimental group to explore their learning experiences and provide a deeper explanation of the quantitative findings.

研究概览

详细说明

Reflective thinking and clinical decision-making are essential competencies for nursing students to deliver safe, evidence-based, and patient-centered care. Active learning approaches are increasingly recommended to improve these competencies during undergraduate nursing education. Creative drama is an experiential teaching method that promotes active participation, critical reflection, communication, empathy, collaboration, and problem-solving through role-playing, improvisation, and group interaction.

This randomized controlled mixed-methods study investigated whether creative drama education improves nursing students' reflective thinking and clinical decision-making compared with conventional case-based discussion. Undergraduate nursing students were randomly allocated to either an experimental group receiving structured creative drama education (n = 40) or a control group receiving case-based discussion sessions (n = 37). Reflective thinking and clinical decision-making were measured before and after the intervention. Subsequently, qualitative interviews were conducted with students in the experimental group to explore their experiences and explain the quantitative findings.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

77

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Undergraduate fourth-year nursing students enrolled in the nursing program.
  • Aged 18 years or older.
  • Able to communicate in Turkish.
  • Available to attend all scheduled educational sessions.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous participation in formal creative drama training related to nursing education.
  • Failure to attend one or more educational sessions.
  • Withdrawal from the study at any stage.
  • Incomplete completion of the study questionnaires (pre-test or post-test).

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Creative Drama-Based Training
Participants received structured creative drama education designed to improve reflective thinking and clinical decision-making through experiential learning, role-playing, improvisation, and group reflection.
Participants in the experimental group received a structured creative drama education program designed to enhance reflective thinking and clinical decision-making skills. The intervention consisted of interactive sessions incorporating warm-up activities, improvisation, role-playing, group enactment of realistic nursing scenarios, reflection, and group discussion. Students actively explored clinical situations by assuming different roles, analyzing patient care problems, and reflecting on their experiences throughout the drama process. The educational content was standardized and delivered by the same instructor using a predefined creative drama program.
其他:Case-Based Discussion
Participants received instructor-guided case discussion sessions covering the same educational objectives using conventional teaching methods.
Participants in the control group received conventional case-based discussion sessions covering the same learning objectives as the experimental group. The sessions included instructor-guided analysis of written clinical cases, question-and-answer activities, and group discussions without the use of creative drama techniques or experiential role-play.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Reflective Thinking
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Change in reflective thinking scores measured from baseline to immediately after completion of the educational intervention using a validated reflective thinking scale.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Clinical Decision-Making
大体时间:Baseline and immediately after the intervention.
Change in clinical decision-making scores measured from baseline to immediately after completion of the educational intervention using a validated clinical decision-making scale.
Baseline and immediately after the intervention.

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年6月1日

初级完成 (实际的)

2025年6月30日

研究完成 (实际的)

2025年6月30日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月3日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月3日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月6日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月3日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • AGRSABFTKS003

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅