此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

2026年8月5日 更新者:Xiaoyan Li、Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Study on Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

This randomized controlled trial integrates baseline observational ultrasound analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of trigger point bloodletting therapy for primary trigeminal neuralgia and explore peripheral ultrasound mechanisms of trigger point lesions and treatment response. Eligible subjects are adults aged 18-75 with unilateral classic primary trigeminal neuralgia and confirmed trigger points in the orbicularis oris muscle.

The primary research question is whether 8-week trigger point bloodletting achieves a greater reduction in Brief Pain Inventory-Facial total score (primary endpoint) than oral carbamazepine. Secondary questions explore inter-side differences in orbicularis oris thickness, elasticity and microvascular perfusion, correlations between ultrasound biomarkers, pain severity and disease duration, as well as differential dynamic ultrasound changes under the two treatments and their links to pain relief.

Participants complete baseline assessments: demographic data, medical history, pain, anxiety, depression and quality-of-life scales, trigger point mapping, and bilateral orbicularis oris ultrasound (grayscale imaging, shear wave elastography, superb microvascular imaging). Subjects are randomly assigned 1:1 to bloodletting intervention or carbamazepine control for 8 weeks. The bloodletting group receives twice-weekly sterile trigger point pricking with cupping bleeding at suitable sites. The control group takes guideline-based individualized carbamazepine, with all subjects maintaining daily pain and medication diaries.

Follow-up evaluations occur at Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, covering pain scoring, trigger point re-evaluation and adverse event monitoring. Post-treatment bilateral orbicularis oris ultrasound is performed at Week 8 to quantify changes in soft tissue structure and microcirculation. All adverse reactions and concurrent medications are documented throughout the trial. Baseline observational analysis compares pretreatment bilateral facial muscle ultrasound features and correlates imaging indicators with clinical pain, to provide objective imaging evidence for peripheral sensitization pathology of trigger points in trigeminal neuralgia patients.

研究概览

详细说明

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial with embedded observational baseline analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of trigger point bloodletting therapy for primary trigeminal neuralgia and explore peripheral musculoskeletal ultrasound mechanisms of trigger point lesions and treatment response. This study enrolls adult participants aged 18 to 75 years with unilateral classic or idiopathic primary trigeminal neuralgia and definite trigger points located in the upper lip orbicularis oris muscle.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does eight weeks of trigger point bloodletting therapy deliver a larger decline in Brief Pain Inventory Facial total score which serves as the primary efficacy endpoint compared with routine oral carbamazepine treatment among participants with primary trigeminal neuralgia? Do orbicularis oris muscle ultrasonographic indicators including soft tissue thickness elasticity and microvascular blood flow present discrepancies between affected sides and contralateral unaffected sides, and do these imaging indicators correlate with pain severity and disease course length? Do the two intervention regimens lead to distinct dynamic variations in orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound parameters, and do such structural and microcirculation variations correlate with clinical pain relief degrees? Researchers will compare participants receiving trigger point bloodletting intervention and participants receiving carbamazepine control treatment to identify whether trigger point bloodletting therapy yields better pain relief and more obvious recovery of soft tissue structure and microcirculation in trigger point regions.

Participants will finish all scheduled study procedures within an eight week treatment cycle as follows Complete baseline screening and systematic assessments covering demographic information medical history collection clinical pain evaluation and quality of life scale measurement. Scales adopted include Brief Pain Inventory Facial visual analogue scale self rating depression scale self rating anxiety scale and the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey. Researchers conduct full range trigger point localization feature recording and bilateral orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound detection. Ultrasound detection includes grayscale imaging shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging modules.

Receive random grouping allocation at a one to one ratio to either trigger point bloodletting group or carbamazepine control group.

Accept corresponding standardized intervention for eight consecutive weeks. Participants in bloodletting group receive trigger point bloodletting therapy two times each week with no less than two days interval between adjacent treatment sessions. Operators implement sterile pricking on confirmed trigger points and conduct cupping auxiliary bleeding for anatomical positions suitable for cupping operation to reach standardized therapeutic blood volume.

Participants in control group take oral carbamazepine tablets following official clinical guidelines with individualized dose adjustment range. All participants record daily medication dosage and real time pain conditions in designated pain diaries.

Attend follow up assessment visits at week two week four week six and week eight. Each follow up includes pain scale scoring repeated trigger point feature evaluation and whole process adverse event surveillance.

Undergo post treatment orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound re examination at week eight to quantify longitudinal changes of soft tissue thickness tissue elasticity and microvascular blood flow signals.

Record all adverse reactions concomitant drugs and unexpected adverse events throughout the entire research period.

The observational baseline analysis takes all pre treatment ultrasound data to compare imaging differences between bilateral facial muscles and analyze correlation relationships between ultrasonic indicators and clinical pain indexes. This part of analysis intends to provide imaging based objective evidence supporting peripheral sensitization pathological changes of trigger points in primary trigeminal neuralgia patients.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

60

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

  • 姓名:Huilin Liu, Dr
  • 电话号码:8618827062868
  • 邮箱:306916598@qq.com

学习地点

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing、Beijing Municipality、中国、250012
        • Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • 接触:

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 18 to 75 years old
  • Participants diagnosed with primary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participants with definite facial trigger points located in the orbicularis oris muscle of upper lip
  • Participants whose pain meets the diagnostic criteria of classic or idiopathic primary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participants with visual analogue scale pain score no less than 4 at screening
  • Participants who can understand scale evaluation and complete follow-up visits on schedule
  • Participants sign written informed consent voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary trigeminal neuralgia caused by tumor vascular compression inflammation or other organic lesions
  • History of facial surgery radiofrequency ablation or nerve block treatment within three months
  • Receiving acupuncture bloodletting or similar physical therapy on facial region within one month
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic diseases including heart liver kidney and hematological disorders
  • Coexisting mental disorders that affect pain assessment and follow up Pregnant or lactating women
  • Known allergy to carbamazepine or bloodletting operation contraindications such as coagulation dysfunction
  • Participants who are unable to cooperate with ultrasound examination

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:三倍

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy Group
Participants receive standardized trigger point bloodletting therapy for 8 consecutive weeks.
Sterile disposable bloodletting needles are used for pricking at confirmed facial trigger points of patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia. Cupping-assisted bleeding is conducted at anatomically appropriate regions. The treatment is delivered twice weekly for 8 consecutive weeks, with an interval of no less than two days between two adjacent treatment sessions.
其他名称:
  • Trigger Point Pricking
  • Cupping Bloodletting
有源比较器:Oral Carbamazepine Control Group
Participants receive individualized oral carbamazepine treatment for 8 consecutive weeks.
Participants receive oral carbamazepine tablets. The dosage is adjusted individually according to clinical guidelines to control pain symptoms, and the maximum daily dose does not exceed 1.2 g. The treatment lasts continuously for 8 weeks.
其他名称:
  • Carbamazepine Oral Administration

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Facial total score
大体时间:Baseline to 8 weeks after intervention initiation
Full unabbreviated scale title: Brief Pain Inventory-Facial. Total score minimum value = 0, maximum value = 100. This item measures the change in total score from baseline to the 8-week endpoint. Higher scores indicate more severe facial pain (worse outcome), lower scores indicate milder facial pain.
Baseline to 8 weeks after intervention initiation

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change in Visual Analogue Scale pain score
大体时间:Baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks
Full unabbreviated scale title: Visual Analogue Scale. Score minimum value = 0, maximum value = 10. This outcome assesses the change in pain score from baseline to the 8-week endpoint. Higher scores indicate stronger pain sensation (worse outcome), lower scores indicate slighter pain.
Baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle soft tissue thickness
大体时间:Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in soft tissue thickness of orbicularis oris muscle measured via grayscale ultrasound from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, measured in millimeters (mm). Lower or higher thickness values reflect altered local soft tissue structure at trigger points.
Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle shear wave elasticity
大体时间:Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in shear wave elasticity of orbicularis oris muscle measured via shear wave elastography ultrasound from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, measured in kilopascals (kPa). Higher elasticity values indicate stiffer soft tissue at trigger points.
Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle microvascular blood flow signal
大体时间:Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in microvascular blood flow signal of orbicularis oris muscle measured via superb microvascular imaging from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, quantified by semi-quantitative blood flow grading. Higher grading scores represent richer local microvascular perfusion.
Baseline to 8 weeks

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Incidence of adverse events
大体时间:Within 8 weeks after intervention start
The number and incidence of adverse events occurring throughout the 8-week treatment period.
Within 8 weeks after intervention start

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年8月31日

初级完成 (估计的)

2027年7月31日

研究完成 (估计的)

2027年8月31日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月31日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月5日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月6日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月6日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月5日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 2024BL02-027-02
  • ZLRK202324 (其他赠款/资助编号:Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals)

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅