Esta página foi traduzida automaticamente e a precisão da tradução não é garantida. Por favor, consulte o versão em inglês para um texto fonte.

Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

5 de agosto de 2026 atualizado por: Xiaoyan Li, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Study on Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

This randomized controlled trial integrates baseline observational ultrasound analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of trigger point bloodletting therapy for primary trigeminal neuralgia and explore peripheral ultrasound mechanisms of trigger point lesions and treatment response. Eligible subjects are adults aged 18-75 with unilateral classic primary trigeminal neuralgia and confirmed trigger points in the orbicularis oris muscle.

The primary research question is whether 8-week trigger point bloodletting achieves a greater reduction in Brief Pain Inventory-Facial total score (primary endpoint) than oral carbamazepine. Secondary questions explore inter-side differences in orbicularis oris thickness, elasticity and microvascular perfusion, correlations between ultrasound biomarkers, pain severity and disease duration, as well as differential dynamic ultrasound changes under the two treatments and their links to pain relief.

Participants complete baseline assessments: demographic data, medical history, pain, anxiety, depression and quality-of-life scales, trigger point mapping, and bilateral orbicularis oris ultrasound (grayscale imaging, shear wave elastography, superb microvascular imaging). Subjects are randomly assigned 1:1 to bloodletting intervention or carbamazepine control for 8 weeks. The bloodletting group receives twice-weekly sterile trigger point pricking with cupping bleeding at suitable sites. The control group takes guideline-based individualized carbamazepine, with all subjects maintaining daily pain and medication diaries.

Follow-up evaluations occur at Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, covering pain scoring, trigger point re-evaluation and adverse event monitoring. Post-treatment bilateral orbicularis oris ultrasound is performed at Week 8 to quantify changes in soft tissue structure and microcirculation. All adverse reactions and concurrent medications are documented throughout the trial. Baseline observational analysis compares pretreatment bilateral facial muscle ultrasound features and correlates imaging indicators with clinical pain, to provide objective imaging evidence for peripheral sensitization pathology of trigger points in trigeminal neuralgia patients.

Visão geral do estudo

Status

Ainda não está recrutando

Descrição detalhada

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial with embedded observational baseline analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of trigger point bloodletting therapy for primary trigeminal neuralgia and explore peripheral musculoskeletal ultrasound mechanisms of trigger point lesions and treatment response. This study enrolls adult participants aged 18 to 75 years with unilateral classic or idiopathic primary trigeminal neuralgia and definite trigger points located in the upper lip orbicularis oris muscle.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does eight weeks of trigger point bloodletting therapy deliver a larger decline in Brief Pain Inventory Facial total score which serves as the primary efficacy endpoint compared with routine oral carbamazepine treatment among participants with primary trigeminal neuralgia? Do orbicularis oris muscle ultrasonographic indicators including soft tissue thickness elasticity and microvascular blood flow present discrepancies between affected sides and contralateral unaffected sides, and do these imaging indicators correlate with pain severity and disease course length? Do the two intervention regimens lead to distinct dynamic variations in orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound parameters, and do such structural and microcirculation variations correlate with clinical pain relief degrees? Researchers will compare participants receiving trigger point bloodletting intervention and participants receiving carbamazepine control treatment to identify whether trigger point bloodletting therapy yields better pain relief and more obvious recovery of soft tissue structure and microcirculation in trigger point regions.

Participants will finish all scheduled study procedures within an eight week treatment cycle as follows Complete baseline screening and systematic assessments covering demographic information medical history collection clinical pain evaluation and quality of life scale measurement. Scales adopted include Brief Pain Inventory Facial visual analogue scale self rating depression scale self rating anxiety scale and the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey. Researchers conduct full range trigger point localization feature recording and bilateral orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound detection. Ultrasound detection includes grayscale imaging shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging modules.

Receive random grouping allocation at a one to one ratio to either trigger point bloodletting group or carbamazepine control group.

Accept corresponding standardized intervention for eight consecutive weeks. Participants in bloodletting group receive trigger point bloodletting therapy two times each week with no less than two days interval between adjacent treatment sessions. Operators implement sterile pricking on confirmed trigger points and conduct cupping auxiliary bleeding for anatomical positions suitable for cupping operation to reach standardized therapeutic blood volume.

Participants in control group take oral carbamazepine tablets following official clinical guidelines with individualized dose adjustment range. All participants record daily medication dosage and real time pain conditions in designated pain diaries.

Attend follow up assessment visits at week two week four week six and week eight. Each follow up includes pain scale scoring repeated trigger point feature evaluation and whole process adverse event surveillance.

Undergo post treatment orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound re examination at week eight to quantify longitudinal changes of soft tissue thickness tissue elasticity and microvascular blood flow signals.

Record all adverse reactions concomitant drugs and unexpected adverse events throughout the entire research period.

The observational baseline analysis takes all pre treatment ultrasound data to compare imaging differences between bilateral facial muscles and analyze correlation relationships between ultrasonic indicators and clinical pain indexes. This part of analysis intends to provide imaging based objective evidence supporting peripheral sensitization pathological changes of trigger points in primary trigeminal neuralgia patients.

Tipo de estudo

Intervencional

Inscrição (Estimado)

60

Estágio

  • Não aplicável

Contactos e Locais

Esta seção fornece os detalhes de contato para aqueles que conduzem o estudo e informações sobre onde este estudo está sendo realizado.

Contato de estudo

  • Nome: Huilin Liu, Dr
  • Número de telefone: 8618827062868
  • E-mail: 306916598@qq.com

Locais de estudo

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 250012
        • Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Contato:

Critérios de participação

Os pesquisadores procuram pessoas que se encaixem em uma determinada descrição, chamada de critérios de elegibilidade. Alguns exemplos desses critérios são a condição geral de saúde de uma pessoa ou tratamentos anteriores.

Critérios de elegibilidade

Idades elegíveis para estudo

  • Adulto
  • Adulto mais velho

Aceita Voluntários Saudáveis

Não

Descrição

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 18 to 75 years old
  • Participants diagnosed with primary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participants with definite facial trigger points located in the orbicularis oris muscle of upper lip
  • Participants whose pain meets the diagnostic criteria of classic or idiopathic primary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participants with visual analogue scale pain score no less than 4 at screening
  • Participants who can understand scale evaluation and complete follow-up visits on schedule
  • Participants sign written informed consent voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary trigeminal neuralgia caused by tumor vascular compression inflammation or other organic lesions
  • History of facial surgery radiofrequency ablation or nerve block treatment within three months
  • Receiving acupuncture bloodletting or similar physical therapy on facial region within one month
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic diseases including heart liver kidney and hematological disorders
  • Coexisting mental disorders that affect pain assessment and follow up Pregnant or lactating women
  • Known allergy to carbamazepine or bloodletting operation contraindications such as coagulation dysfunction
  • Participants who are unable to cooperate with ultrasound examination

Plano de estudo

Esta seção fornece detalhes do plano de estudo, incluindo como o estudo é projetado e o que o estudo está medindo.

Como o estudo é projetado?

Detalhes do projeto

  • Finalidade Principal: Tratamento
  • Alocação: Randomizado
  • Modelo Intervencional: Atribuição Paralela
  • Mascaramento: Triplo

Armas e Intervenções

Grupo de Participantes / Braço
Intervenção / Tratamento
Experimental: Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy Group
Participants receive standardized trigger point bloodletting therapy for 8 consecutive weeks.
Sterile disposable bloodletting needles are used for pricking at confirmed facial trigger points of patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia. Cupping-assisted bleeding is conducted at anatomically appropriate regions. The treatment is delivered twice weekly for 8 consecutive weeks, with an interval of no less than two days between two adjacent treatment sessions.
Outros nomes:
  • Trigger Point Pricking
  • Cupping Bloodletting
Comparador Ativo: Oral Carbamazepine Control Group
Participants receive individualized oral carbamazepine treatment for 8 consecutive weeks.
Participants receive oral carbamazepine tablets. The dosage is adjusted individually according to clinical guidelines to control pain symptoms, and the maximum daily dose does not exceed 1.2 g. The treatment lasts continuously for 8 weeks.
Outros nomes:
  • Carbamazepine Oral Administration

O que o estudo está medindo?

Medidas de resultados primários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Facial total score
Prazo: Baseline to 8 weeks after intervention initiation
Full unabbreviated scale title: Brief Pain Inventory-Facial. Total score minimum value = 0, maximum value = 100. This item measures the change in total score from baseline to the 8-week endpoint. Higher scores indicate more severe facial pain (worse outcome), lower scores indicate milder facial pain.
Baseline to 8 weeks after intervention initiation

Medidas de resultados secundários

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Change in Visual Analogue Scale pain score
Prazo: Baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks
Full unabbreviated scale title: Visual Analogue Scale. Score minimum value = 0, maximum value = 10. This outcome assesses the change in pain score from baseline to the 8-week endpoint. Higher scores indicate stronger pain sensation (worse outcome), lower scores indicate slighter pain.
Baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle soft tissue thickness
Prazo: Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in soft tissue thickness of orbicularis oris muscle measured via grayscale ultrasound from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, measured in millimeters (mm). Lower or higher thickness values reflect altered local soft tissue structure at trigger points.
Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle shear wave elasticity
Prazo: Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in shear wave elasticity of orbicularis oris muscle measured via shear wave elastography ultrasound from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, measured in kilopascals (kPa). Higher elasticity values indicate stiffer soft tissue at trigger points.
Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle microvascular blood flow signal
Prazo: Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in microvascular blood flow signal of orbicularis oris muscle measured via superb microvascular imaging from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, quantified by semi-quantitative blood flow grading. Higher grading scores represent richer local microvascular perfusion.
Baseline to 8 weeks

Outras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Descrição da medida
Prazo
Incidence of adverse events
Prazo: Within 8 weeks after intervention start
The number and incidence of adverse events occurring throughout the 8-week treatment period.
Within 8 weeks after intervention start

Colaboradores e Investigadores

É aqui que você encontrará pessoas e organizações envolvidas com este estudo.

Datas de registro do estudo

Essas datas acompanham o progresso do registro do estudo e os envios de resumo dos resultados para ClinicalTrials.gov. Os registros do estudo e os resultados relatados são revisados ​​pela National Library of Medicine (NLM) para garantir que atendam aos padrões específicos de controle de qualidade antes de serem publicados no site público.

Datas Principais do Estudo

Início do estudo (Estimado)

31 de agosto de 2026

Conclusão Primária (Estimado)

31 de julho de 2027

Conclusão do estudo (Estimado)

31 de agosto de 2027

Datas de inscrição no estudo

Enviado pela primeira vez

31 de julho de 2026

Enviado pela primeira vez que atendeu aos critérios de CQ

5 de agosto de 2026

Primeira postagem (Real)

6 de agosto de 2026

Atualizações de registro de estudo

Última Atualização Postada (Real)

6 de agosto de 2026

Última atualização enviada que atendeu aos critérios de controle de qualidade

5 de agosto de 2026

Última verificação

1 de julho de 2026

Mais Informações

Termos relacionados a este estudo

Outros números de identificação do estudo

  • 2024BL02-027-02
  • ZLRK202324 (Número de outro subsídio/financiamento: Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals)

Plano para dados de participantes individuais (IPD)

Planeja compartilhar dados de participantes individuais (IPD)?

INDECISO

Informações sobre medicamentos e dispositivos, documentos de estudo

Estuda um medicamento regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Estuda um produto de dispositivo regulamentado pela FDA dos EUA

Não

Essas informações foram obtidas diretamente do site clinicaltrials.gov sem nenhuma alteração. Se você tiver alguma solicitação para alterar, remover ou atualizar os detalhes do seu estudo, entre em contato com register@clinicaltrials.gov. Assim que uma alteração for implementada em clinicaltrials.gov, ela também será atualizada automaticamente em nosso site .

Se inscrever