Diese Seite wurde automatisch übersetzt und die Genauigkeit der Übersetzung wird nicht garantiert. Bitte wende dich an die englische Version für einen Quelltext.

Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

5. August 2026 aktualisiert von: Xiaoyan Li, Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine

Study on Clinical Efficacy and Peripheral Ultrasound Mechanism of Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy for Primary Trigeminal Neuralgia

This randomized controlled trial integrates baseline observational ultrasound analysis to assess the clinical efficacy of trigger point bloodletting therapy for primary trigeminal neuralgia and explore peripheral ultrasound mechanisms of trigger point lesions and treatment response. Eligible subjects are adults aged 18-75 with unilateral classic primary trigeminal neuralgia and confirmed trigger points in the orbicularis oris muscle.

The primary research question is whether 8-week trigger point bloodletting achieves a greater reduction in Brief Pain Inventory-Facial total score (primary endpoint) than oral carbamazepine. Secondary questions explore inter-side differences in orbicularis oris thickness, elasticity and microvascular perfusion, correlations between ultrasound biomarkers, pain severity and disease duration, as well as differential dynamic ultrasound changes under the two treatments and their links to pain relief.

Participants complete baseline assessments: demographic data, medical history, pain, anxiety, depression and quality-of-life scales, trigger point mapping, and bilateral orbicularis oris ultrasound (grayscale imaging, shear wave elastography, superb microvascular imaging). Subjects are randomly assigned 1:1 to bloodletting intervention or carbamazepine control for 8 weeks. The bloodletting group receives twice-weekly sterile trigger point pricking with cupping bleeding at suitable sites. The control group takes guideline-based individualized carbamazepine, with all subjects maintaining daily pain and medication diaries.

Follow-up evaluations occur at Weeks 2, 4, 6 and 8, covering pain scoring, trigger point re-evaluation and adverse event monitoring. Post-treatment bilateral orbicularis oris ultrasound is performed at Week 8 to quantify changes in soft tissue structure and microcirculation. All adverse reactions and concurrent medications are documented throughout the trial. Baseline observational analysis compares pretreatment bilateral facial muscle ultrasound features and correlates imaging indicators with clinical pain, to provide objective imaging evidence for peripheral sensitization pathology of trigger points in trigeminal neuralgia patients.

Studienübersicht

Status

Noch keine Rekrutierung

Detaillierte Beschreibung

The goal of this randomized controlled clinical trial with embedded observational baseline analysis is to evaluate the clinical efficacy of trigger point bloodletting therapy for primary trigeminal neuralgia and explore peripheral musculoskeletal ultrasound mechanisms of trigger point lesions and treatment response. This study enrolls adult participants aged 18 to 75 years with unilateral classic or idiopathic primary trigeminal neuralgia and definite trigger points located in the upper lip orbicularis oris muscle.

The main questions it aims to answer are:

Does eight weeks of trigger point bloodletting therapy deliver a larger decline in Brief Pain Inventory Facial total score which serves as the primary efficacy endpoint compared with routine oral carbamazepine treatment among participants with primary trigeminal neuralgia? Do orbicularis oris muscle ultrasonographic indicators including soft tissue thickness elasticity and microvascular blood flow present discrepancies between affected sides and contralateral unaffected sides, and do these imaging indicators correlate with pain severity and disease course length? Do the two intervention regimens lead to distinct dynamic variations in orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound parameters, and do such structural and microcirculation variations correlate with clinical pain relief degrees? Researchers will compare participants receiving trigger point bloodletting intervention and participants receiving carbamazepine control treatment to identify whether trigger point bloodletting therapy yields better pain relief and more obvious recovery of soft tissue structure and microcirculation in trigger point regions.

Participants will finish all scheduled study procedures within an eight week treatment cycle as follows Complete baseline screening and systematic assessments covering demographic information medical history collection clinical pain evaluation and quality of life scale measurement. Scales adopted include Brief Pain Inventory Facial visual analogue scale self rating depression scale self rating anxiety scale and the 36 Item Short Form Health Survey. Researchers conduct full range trigger point localization feature recording and bilateral orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound detection. Ultrasound detection includes grayscale imaging shear wave elastography and superb microvascular imaging modules.

Receive random grouping allocation at a one to one ratio to either trigger point bloodletting group or carbamazepine control group.

Accept corresponding standardized intervention for eight consecutive weeks. Participants in bloodletting group receive trigger point bloodletting therapy two times each week with no less than two days interval between adjacent treatment sessions. Operators implement sterile pricking on confirmed trigger points and conduct cupping auxiliary bleeding for anatomical positions suitable for cupping operation to reach standardized therapeutic blood volume.

Participants in control group take oral carbamazepine tablets following official clinical guidelines with individualized dose adjustment range. All participants record daily medication dosage and real time pain conditions in designated pain diaries.

Attend follow up assessment visits at week two week four week six and week eight. Each follow up includes pain scale scoring repeated trigger point feature evaluation and whole process adverse event surveillance.

Undergo post treatment orbicularis oris muscle ultrasound re examination at week eight to quantify longitudinal changes of soft tissue thickness tissue elasticity and microvascular blood flow signals.

Record all adverse reactions concomitant drugs and unexpected adverse events throughout the entire research period.

The observational baseline analysis takes all pre treatment ultrasound data to compare imaging differences between bilateral facial muscles and analyze correlation relationships between ultrasonic indicators and clinical pain indexes. This part of analysis intends to provide imaging based objective evidence supporting peripheral sensitization pathological changes of trigger points in primary trigeminal neuralgia patients.

Studientyp

Interventionell

Einschreibung (Geschätzt)

60

Phase

  • Unzutreffend

Kontakte und Standorte

Dieser Abschnitt enthält die Kontaktdaten derjenigen, die die Studie durchführen, und Informationen darüber, wo diese Studie durchgeführt wird.

Studienkontakt

Studienorte

    • Beijing Municipality
      • Beijing, Beijing Municipality, China, 250012
        • Capital Medical University Affiliated Beijing Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine
        • Kontakt:

Teilnahmekriterien

Forscher suchen nach Personen, die einer bestimmten Beschreibung entsprechen, die als Auswahlkriterien bezeichnet werden. Einige Beispiele für diese Kriterien sind der allgemeine Gesundheitszustand einer Person oder frühere Behandlungen.

Zulassungskriterien

Studienberechtigtes Alter

  • Erwachsene
  • Älterer Erwachsener

Akzeptiert gesunde Freiwillige

Nein

Beschreibung

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Participants aged 18 to 75 years old
  • Participants diagnosed with primary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participants with definite facial trigger points located in the orbicularis oris muscle of upper lip
  • Participants whose pain meets the diagnostic criteria of classic or idiopathic primary trigeminal neuralgia
  • Participants with visual analogue scale pain score no less than 4 at screening
  • Participants who can understand scale evaluation and complete follow-up visits on schedule
  • Participants sign written informed consent voluntarily

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Secondary trigeminal neuralgia caused by tumor vascular compression inflammation or other organic lesions
  • History of facial surgery radiofrequency ablation or nerve block treatment within three months
  • Receiving acupuncture bloodletting or similar physical therapy on facial region within one month
  • Severe uncontrolled systemic diseases including heart liver kidney and hematological disorders
  • Coexisting mental disorders that affect pain assessment and follow up Pregnant or lactating women
  • Known allergy to carbamazepine or bloodletting operation contraindications such as coagulation dysfunction
  • Participants who are unable to cooperate with ultrasound examination

Studienplan

Dieser Abschnitt enthält Einzelheiten zum Studienplan, einschließlich des Studiendesigns und der Messung der Studieninhalte.

Wie ist die Studie aufgebaut?

Designdetails

  • Hauptzweck: Behandlung
  • Zuteilung: Zufällig
  • Interventionsmodell: Parallele Zuordnung
  • Maskierung: Verdreifachen

Waffen und Interventionen

Teilnehmergruppe / Arm
Intervention / Behandlung
Experimental: Trigger Point Bloodletting Therapy Group
Participants receive standardized trigger point bloodletting therapy for 8 consecutive weeks.
Sterile disposable bloodletting needles are used for pricking at confirmed facial trigger points of patients with primary trigeminal neuralgia. Cupping-assisted bleeding is conducted at anatomically appropriate regions. The treatment is delivered twice weekly for 8 consecutive weeks, with an interval of no less than two days between two adjacent treatment sessions.
Andere Namen:
  • Trigger Point Pricking
  • Cupping Bloodletting
Aktiver Komparator: Oral Carbamazepine Control Group
Participants receive individualized oral carbamazepine treatment for 8 consecutive weeks.
Participants receive oral carbamazepine tablets. The dosage is adjusted individually according to clinical guidelines to control pain symptoms, and the maximum daily dose does not exceed 1.2 g. The treatment lasts continuously for 8 weeks.
Andere Namen:
  • Carbamazepine Oral Administration

Was misst die Studie?

Primäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Brief Pain Inventory-Facial total score
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 8 weeks after intervention initiation
Full unabbreviated scale title: Brief Pain Inventory-Facial. Total score minimum value = 0, maximum value = 100. This item measures the change in total score from baseline to the 8-week endpoint. Higher scores indicate more severe facial pain (worse outcome), lower scores indicate milder facial pain.
Baseline to 8 weeks after intervention initiation

Sekundäre Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Change in Visual Analogue Scale pain score
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks
Full unabbreviated scale title: Visual Analogue Scale. Score minimum value = 0, maximum value = 10. This outcome assesses the change in pain score from baseline to the 8-week endpoint. Higher scores indicate stronger pain sensation (worse outcome), lower scores indicate slighter pain.
Baseline to 2 weeks, 4 weeks, 6 weeks, 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle soft tissue thickness
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in soft tissue thickness of orbicularis oris muscle measured via grayscale ultrasound from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, measured in millimeters (mm). Lower or higher thickness values reflect altered local soft tissue structure at trigger points.
Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle shear wave elasticity
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in shear wave elasticity of orbicularis oris muscle measured via shear wave elastography ultrasound from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, measured in kilopascals (kPa). Higher elasticity values indicate stiffer soft tissue at trigger points.
Baseline to 8 weeks
Change in orbicularis oris muscle microvascular blood flow signal
Zeitfenster: Baseline to 8 weeks
This outcome evaluates the change in microvascular blood flow signal of orbicularis oris muscle measured via superb microvascular imaging from baseline to the 8-week endpoint, quantified by semi-quantitative blood flow grading. Higher grading scores represent richer local microvascular perfusion.
Baseline to 8 weeks

Andere Ergebnismessungen

Ergebnis Maßnahme
Maßnahmenbeschreibung
Zeitfenster
Incidence of adverse events
Zeitfenster: Within 8 weeks after intervention start
The number and incidence of adverse events occurring throughout the 8-week treatment period.
Within 8 weeks after intervention start

Mitarbeiter und Ermittler

Hier finden Sie Personen und Organisationen, die an dieser Studie beteiligt sind.

Studienaufzeichnungsdaten

Diese Daten verfolgen den Fortschritt der Übermittlung von Studienaufzeichnungen und zusammenfassenden Ergebnissen an ClinicalTrials.gov. Studienaufzeichnungen und gemeldete Ergebnisse werden von der National Library of Medicine (NLM) überprüft, um sicherzustellen, dass sie bestimmten Qualitätskontrollstandards entsprechen, bevor sie auf der öffentlichen Website veröffentlicht werden.

Haupttermine studieren

Studienbeginn (Geschätzt)

31. August 2026

Primärer Abschluss (Geschätzt)

31. Juli 2027

Studienabschluss (Geschätzt)

31. August 2027

Studienanmeldedaten

Zuerst eingereicht

31. Juli 2026

Zuerst eingereicht, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt hat

5. August 2026

Zuerst gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. August 2026

Studienaufzeichnungsaktualisierungen

Letztes Update gepostet (Tatsächlich)

6. August 2026

Letztes eingereichtes Update, das die QC-Kriterien erfüllt

5. August 2026

Zuletzt verifiziert

1. Juli 2026

Mehr Informationen

Begriffe im Zusammenhang mit dieser Studie

Plan für individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD)

Planen Sie, individuelle Teilnehmerdaten (IPD) zu teilen?

UNENTSCHIEDEN

Arzneimittel- und Geräteinformationen, Studienunterlagen

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Arzneimittelprodukt

Nein

Studiert ein von der US-amerikanischen FDA reguliertes Geräteprodukt

Nein

Diese Informationen wurden ohne Änderungen direkt von der Website clinicaltrials.gov abgerufen. Wenn Sie Ihre Studiendaten ändern, entfernen oder aktualisieren möchten, wenden Sie sich bitte an register@clinicaltrials.gov. Sobald eine Änderung auf clinicaltrials.gov implementiert wird, wird diese automatisch auch auf unserer Website aktualisiert .

Abonnieren