此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Developing a Recovery-Oriented Suicide Prevention Program for Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

2026年8月10日 更新者:Samantha A. Chalker、University of California, San Diego

Development of a Recovery-Oriented Suicide Prevention Intervention With Peers for Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Young people at clinical high risk for psychosis are more likely to experience suicide thoughts than the general population, but there are few suicide prevention programs designed specifically for them. This study will develop and evaluate a recovery-oriented suicide prevention group program for young people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

The program will be led by a clinician and a peer with lived experience. It will help participants identify reasons for living, build hope, set meaningful recovery goals, strengthen social connections, and learn strategies to better remember and use suicide prevention strategies developed during the program. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in a session to learn ways to support their young person.

The study will first gather feedback from participants, caregivers, clinicians, and community advisors to refine the program. Researchers will then compare the program plus standard care with standard care alone to determine whether it improves personal recovery and increases participants' ability to remember and use suicide prevention strategies. Researchers will also collect feedback from participants and program staff to better understand how the program can be integrated into early psychosis services.

研究概览

详细说明

Young people at clinical high risk for psychosis experience elevated rates of suicide thoughts and behaviors, yet there are few suicide prevention interventions designed specifically for this population. This study will develop and evaluate a recovery-oriented suicide prevention group intervention that integrates peer support with clinician-led care and is designed for implementation within early psychosis services.

This hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study will be conducted over approximately three years at two early psychosis programs. During the first phase, the intervention will be refined through input from young people with lived experience, caregivers, clinicians, and community advisors, followed by an open trial to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and any additional adaptations needed before broader evaluation.

The second phase will consist of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the intervention plus standard care with standard care alone. The study will examine preliminary effects on personal recovery and participants' ability to remember and use suicide prevention strategies.

The final phase will evaluate factors that may influence future implementation of the intervention in routine early psychosis services. Interviews with participants and program staff will be used to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and to inform resources that support future adoption and sustainability if the intervention proves promising.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (估计的)

108

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习联系方式

学习地点

    • California
      • Los Angeles、California、美国、90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
        • 接触:
      • San Diego、California、美国、92161
        • University of California, San Diego
        • 接触:

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 孩子
  • 成人

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Young Person Inclusion Criteria:

  • symptoms of clinical high risk for psychosis in the last two years
  • lifetime active suicide ideation and/or lifetime suicide behavior
  • has a caregiver willing to participate

Young Person Exclusion Criterion:

  • not able to read and write in English

Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:

  • has a familial relationship with the young person participant
  • has at least 4 hours of face-to-face contact with the patient participant every week, even if they do not live together

Caregiver Exclusion Criteria: None

***

Administrator/Clinician Inclusion Criteria:

  • employed at the University of California, San Diego or University of California, Los Angeles early psychosis program

Administrator/Clinician Exclusion Criteria: None

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:单身的

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
其他:标准护理
Coordinated speciality care for early psychosis
实验性的:Suicide Prevention Intervention
The program will be led by a clinician and a peer with lived experience. It will help participants identify reasons for living, build hope, set meaningful recovery goals, strengthen social connections, and learn strategies to better remember and use the suicide prevention strategies developed during the program. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in a session to learn ways to support their young person and promote recovery and stability. This program will be in addition to standard coordinated speciality care for early psychosis.
The program will be led by a clinician and a peer specialist with lived experience. It will help participants identify reasons for living, build hope, set meaningful recovery goals, strengthen social connections, and learn strategies to better remember and use the suicide prevention strategies developed during the program. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in a session to learn ways to support their young person and promote recovery and stability. This program will be in addition to coordinated speciality care for early psychosis.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Recruitment Rate
大体时间:From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Retention Rate
大体时间:From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Intervention Attendance
大体时间:From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 9 weeks
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 9 weeks
Acceptability
大体时间:The 3 month follow-up assessment
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Total scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability of the intervention.
The 3 month follow-up assessment

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Personal Recovery
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Personal recovery will be assessed using the Recovery Assessment Scale-41 (RAS-41). Total scores range from 41 to 205, with higher scores indicating greater personal recovery.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Suicide Prevention Strategy Recall
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Suicide prevention strategy recall will be assessed by the Suicide Prevention Strategy Recall Task, which collects a count of the number of strategies recalled with a higher number indicating more strategies recalled.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Outpatient Mental Health Treatment Service Utilization
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Outpatient Treatment Service Utilization will be assessed as a composite count of outpatient mental health treatment appointments attended during the follow-up period. Data will be abstracted from the electronic medical record and supplemented with participant self-report to capture services received outside the health system. Services include individual therapy, group therapy, family therapy, medication management, and other outpatient mental health visits.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Suicide-Related Crisis Service Utilization
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Crisis Service Utilization will be assessed using a composite measure of suicide-related crisis service encounters. Data will be abstracted from the electronic medical record and supplemented with participant self-report to capture services received outside the health system. Services include emergency department visits, emergency psychiatric services, and inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Social Functioning
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Social functioning will be assessed using the Global Functioning: Social Scale (GF: Social). The scale ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better social functioning.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up of Suicide Ideation Severity
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Suicide ideation severity will be assessed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Severity of Ideation subscale. Scores range from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no suicide ideation and higher scores indicate greater severity of suicide ideation.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Role Functioning
大体时间:From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Role functioning will be assessed using the Global Functioning: Role Scale (GF: Role). The scale ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better role functioning.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (估计的)

2026年8月1日

初级完成 (估计的)

2028年12月1日

研究完成 (估计的)

2028年12月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年7月27日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月6日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月10日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月12日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月10日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

是的

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅