Developing a Recovery-Oriented Suicide Prevention Program for Young People at Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

August 10, 2026 updated by: Samantha A. Chalker, University of California, San Diego

Development of a Recovery-Oriented Suicide Prevention Intervention With Peers for Clinical High Risk for Psychosis

Young people at clinical high risk for psychosis are more likely to experience suicide thoughts than the general population, but there are few suicide prevention programs designed specifically for them. This study will develop and evaluate a recovery-oriented suicide prevention group program for young people at clinical high risk for psychosis.

The program will be led by a clinician and a peer with lived experience. It will help participants identify reasons for living, build hope, set meaningful recovery goals, strengthen social connections, and learn strategies to better remember and use suicide prevention strategies developed during the program. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in a session to learn ways to support their young person.

The study will first gather feedback from participants, caregivers, clinicians, and community advisors to refine the program. Researchers will then compare the program plus standard care with standard care alone to determine whether it improves personal recovery and increases participants' ability to remember and use suicide prevention strategies. Researchers will also collect feedback from participants and program staff to better understand how the program can be integrated into early psychosis services.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Young people at clinical high risk for psychosis experience elevated rates of suicide thoughts and behaviors, yet there are few suicide prevention interventions designed specifically for this population. This study will develop and evaluate a recovery-oriented suicide prevention group intervention that integrates peer support with clinician-led care and is designed for implementation within early psychosis services.

This hybrid type 1 effectiveness-implementation study will be conducted over approximately three years at two early psychosis programs. During the first phase, the intervention will be refined through input from young people with lived experience, caregivers, clinicians, and community advisors, followed by an open trial to evaluate feasibility, acceptability, fidelity, and any additional adaptations needed before broader evaluation.

The second phase will consist of a pilot randomized controlled trial comparing the intervention plus standard care with standard care alone. The study will examine preliminary effects on personal recovery and participants' ability to remember and use suicide prevention strategies.

The final phase will evaluate factors that may influence future implementation of the intervention in routine early psychosis services. Interviews with participants and program staff will be used to identify barriers and facilitators to implementation and to inform resources that support future adoption and sustainability if the intervention proves promising.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Estimated)

108

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Contact

Study Locations

    • California
      • Los Angeles, California, United States, 90095
        • University of California, Los Angeles
        • Contact:
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92161
        • University of California, San Diego
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

  • Child
  • Adult

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Description

Young Person Inclusion Criteria:

  • symptoms of clinical high risk for psychosis in the last two years
  • lifetime active suicide ideation and/or lifetime suicide behavior
  • has a caregiver willing to participate

Young Person Exclusion Criterion:

  • not able to read and write in English

Caregiver Inclusion Criteria:

  • has a familial relationship with the young person participant
  • has at least 4 hours of face-to-face contact with the patient participant every week, even if they do not live together

Caregiver Exclusion Criteria: None

***

Administrator/Clinician Inclusion Criteria:

  • employed at the University of California, San Diego or University of California, Los Angeles early psychosis program

Administrator/Clinician Exclusion Criteria: None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Standard care
Coordinated speciality care for early psychosis
Experimental: Suicide Prevention Intervention
The program will be led by a clinician and a peer with lived experience. It will help participants identify reasons for living, build hope, set meaningful recovery goals, strengthen social connections, and learn strategies to better remember and use the suicide prevention strategies developed during the program. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in a session to learn ways to support their young person and promote recovery and stability. This program will be in addition to standard coordinated speciality care for early psychosis.
The program will be led by a clinician and a peer specialist with lived experience. It will help participants identify reasons for living, build hope, set meaningful recovery goals, strengthen social connections, and learn strategies to better remember and use the suicide prevention strategies developed during the program. Caregivers will also be invited to participate in a session to learn ways to support their young person and promote recovery and stability. This program will be in addition to coordinated speciality care for early psychosis.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Recruitment Rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Retention Rate
Time Frame: From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
From enrollment to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Intervention Attendance
Time Frame: From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 9 weeks
From enrollment to the end of the intervention at 9 weeks
Acceptability
Time Frame: The 3 month follow-up assessment
Intervention acceptability will be assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM). Total scores range from 4 to 20, with higher scores indicating greater perceived acceptability of the intervention.
The 3 month follow-up assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Personal Recovery
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Personal recovery will be assessed using the Recovery Assessment Scale-41 (RAS-41). Total scores range from 41 to 205, with higher scores indicating greater personal recovery.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Suicide Prevention Strategy Recall
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Suicide prevention strategy recall will be assessed by the Suicide Prevention Strategy Recall Task, which collects a count of the number of strategies recalled with a higher number indicating more strategies recalled.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Outpatient Mental Health Treatment Service Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Outpatient Treatment Service Utilization will be assessed as a composite count of outpatient mental health treatment appointments attended during the follow-up period. Data will be abstracted from the electronic medical record and supplemented with participant self-report to capture services received outside the health system. Services include individual therapy, group therapy, family therapy, medication management, and other outpatient mental health visits.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Suicide-Related Crisis Service Utilization
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Crisis Service Utilization will be assessed using a composite measure of suicide-related crisis service encounters. Data will be abstracted from the electronic medical record and supplemented with participant self-report to capture services received outside the health system. Services include emergency department visits, emergency psychiatric services, and inpatient psychiatric hospitalizations.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Social Functioning
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Social functioning will be assessed using the Global Functioning: Social Scale (GF: Social). The scale ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better social functioning.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up of Suicide Ideation Severity
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Suicide ideation severity will be assessed using the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Severity of Ideation subscale. Scores range from 0 to 5, where 0 indicates no suicide ideation and higher scores indicate greater severity of suicide ideation.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Change from Baseline to 3-Month Follow-Up in Role Functioning
Time Frame: From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment
Role functioning will be assessed using the Global Functioning: Role Scale (GF: Role). The scale ranges from 1 to 10, with higher scores indicating better role functioning.
From baseline to the 3-month follow-up assessment

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Estimated)

August 1, 2026

Primary Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 1, 2028

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 27, 2026

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2026

First Posted (Actual)

August 10, 2026

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

August 12, 2026

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2026

Last Verified

August 1, 2026

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

No

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe