Family-authored Digital ICU Diary Intervention to Support Bereaved Family Members in Intensive Care Unit: A Pilot Mixed Methods Study (ICU-Diary-HK)
Feasibility, Acceptability and Efficacy of a Family-authored Digital ICU Diary Intervention for Bereaved Family Members in Hong Kong Intensive Care Units: A Pilot Randomised Controlled Trial With Qualitative Process Evaluation
Objectives: To assess the feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness of a family-authored digital ICU diary intervention for bereaved family members in Hong Kong ICUs, and to explore family members' experiences of writing digital diaries during and following patient death.
Hypothesis: The ICU digital diary intervention will prove feasible, acceptable and potentially efficacious in reducing bereaved family members' PTSD, anxiety and depression at 1 and 3 months post-patient death compared with baseline measurements.
Design and Subjects: A two-arm, assessor-blind pilot randomised controlled trial with subsequent qualitative process evaluation. Forty family members of ICU patients receiving life-sustaining treatment will be recruited from three Hong Kong public hospitals and randomised 1:1 to intervention or control groups.
Instruments: Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R), Posttraumatic Stress Syndrome-14 (PTSS-14) and Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS).
Intervention: Family-authored digital ICU diary via WhatsApp, commencing when a patient's treatment is deemed life-sustaining, continuing through death and a one-month bereavement period.
Main Outcome Measures: Primary: recruitment rate, retention rate, compliance, feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness. Secondary: symptoms of PTSD, anxiety and depression.
Data Analysis: Descriptive statistics for feasibility outcomes; repeated measures ANOVA and linear mixed effects models for psychological outcomes; thematic analysis for qualitative data.
研究概览
研究类型
注册 (估计的)
阶段
- 不适用
联系人和位置
学习联系方式
- 姓名：Hye Ri Choi
- 电话号码：852-6349-0524
- 邮箱：hyeripc@hku.hk
参与标准
资格标准
适合学习的年龄
- 成人
- 年长者
接受健康志愿者
描述
Inclusion Criteria:
- One family member (closest to patient: spouse, grown child, or parent) of adult ICU patients whose treatment is considered life-sustaining
- Patient admitted to adult ICU for minimum 48 hours
- Patient dies in adult ICU without transfer to other inpatient units
- Able to read, write and communicate effectively in Chinese or English
Exclusion Criteria:
- Currently diagnosed with psychiatric disease and taking psychotropic medication
- Currently participating in any psychological intervention
- Cognitive impairment
学习计划
研究是如何设计的？
设计细节
- 主要用途：卫生服务研究
- 分配：随机化
- 介入模型：并行分配
- 屏蔽：单身的
武器和干预
参与者组/臂 |
干预/治疗 |
|---|---|
|
实验性的：干涉
|
From medical consideration of life-sustaining treatment through patient death + 1 month post-death (approximately 4 weeks active writing, then wound down)
Standard care without the digital ICU diary intervention
|
|
有源比较器：控制
|
Standard care without the digital ICU diary intervention
|
研究衡量的是什么？
主要结果指标
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Feasibility of the Digital ICU Diary Intervention
大体时间：Month 1 and Month 3 after patient's death
|
Feasibility assessed using the Feasibility of Intervention Measure (FIM), a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree to 5=Completely agree).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived feasibility.
|
Month 1 and Month 3 after patient's death
|
|
Acceptability of the Digital ICU Diary Intervention
大体时间：Month 1 and Month 3 after patient's death
|
Acceptability assessed using the Acceptability of Intervention Measure (AIM), a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree to 5=Completely agree).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived acceptability.
|
Month 1 and Month 3 after patient's death
|
|
Appropriateness of the Digital ICU Diary Intervention
大体时间：Month 1 and Month 3 after patient's death
|
Appropriateness assessed using the Intervention Appropriateness Measure (IAM), a 4-item, 5-point Likert scale (1=Completely disagree to 5=Completely agree).
Higher scores indicate greater perceived appropriateness.
|
Month 1 and Month 3 after patient's death
|
次要结果测量
结果测量 |
措施说明 |
大体时间 |
|---|---|---|
|
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms as Measured by the Impact of Event Scale-Revised (IES-R)
大体时间：Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
IES-R, a 22-item self-report scale rated on a 5-point scale (0=not at all to 4=extremely).
Total score ranges from 0 to 88.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms.
|
Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
|
Post-Traumatic Stress Symptoms as Measured by PTSS-14
大体时间：Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
Posttraumatic Stress Syndrome-14 (PTSS-14), a 14-item self-report scale rated on a 7-point Likert scale (1=never to 7=always).
Total score ranges from 14 to 98. Higher scores indicate greater severity of post-traumatic stress symptoms.
|
Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
|
Anxiety as Measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-A)
大体时间：Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
HADS anxiety subscale, 7 items scored 0-3 each.
Subscale score ranges from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of anxiety symptoms.
|
Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
|
Depression as Measured by the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D)
大体时间：Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
HADS depression subscale, 7 items scored 0-3 each.
Subscale score ranges from 0 to 21.
Higher scores indicate greater severity of depression symptoms.
|
Baseline, Month 1, and Month 3 after patient's death
|
合作者和调查者
研究记录日期
研究主要日期
学习开始 (估计的)
初级完成 (估计的)
研究完成 (估计的)
研究注册日期
首次提交
首先提交符合 QC 标准的
首次发布 (实际的)
研究记录更新
最后更新发布 (实际的)
上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新
最后验证
更多信息
此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索，没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求，请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改，我们的网站上也会自动更新.