此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Effects of Balance Training on Balance and Fall Confidence After Hip Replacement Surgery

2026年8月26日 更新者:Jun Deokhoon、Daegu University

Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Balance Ability and Fall Efficacy in Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback on balance ability, hip function, and falls efficacy in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thirty participants who underwent THA will be randomly assigned to either a perturbation-based balance training group or a conventional balance training group. Both groups will receive intervention five times per week for 6 weeks in addition to conventional physical therapy. Outcome measures include Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test, Falls Efficacy Scale, Harris Hip Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and center of pressure (COP) parameters. The study is expected to provide clinical evidence for improving balance control and reducing fall risk in patients after THA.

研究概览

详细说明

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly performed to reduce pain and improve functional mobility in patients with hip joint disorders. However, many patients continue to experience impaired balance control, decreased proprioception, muscle weakness, and fear of falling after surgery. These impairments may negatively affect gait stability, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

Traditional balance training programs mainly focus on static posture control and predictable weight-shifting tasks. However, such approaches may not adequately improve reactive postural control required for unexpected balance disturbances encountered during daily activities. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) has recently gained attention as an intervention designed to improve reactive balance control by exposing individuals to unexpected external disturbances and encouraging adaptive postural responses.

This study aims to investigate the effects of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in patients following total hip arthroplasty. The pressure biofeedback system provides controlled instability and real-time sensory feedback during balance tasks, allowing participants to improve postural control strategies and weight-shifting ability.

Thirty patients who underwent THA will be recruited and randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group will receive perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group will perform conventional balance training with conventional physical therapy. Interventions will be performed 5 times per week for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures will include balance performance assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and center of pressure (COP) parameters measured using a Wii Balance Board. Falls efficacy will be evaluated using the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). Hip function and lower extremity function will be assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

The findings of this study may provide evidence supporting the clinical applicability of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback as an effective rehabilitation strategy for improving postural stability and reducing fall risk after THA.

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

30

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Gyeongsangbuk-do
      • Gyeongsan-si、Gyeongsangbuk-do、韩国、38453
        • Daegu University

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

不

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA)
  • Postoperative period between 2 weeks and 6 months
  • Ability to understand and follow therapist instructions
  • Able to stand independently with or without an assistive device
  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 21 and 45
  • Receiving inpatient rehabilitation and physical therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment (K-MMSE < 18)
  • Severe visual impairment or vestibular dysfunction
  • Any neurological or musculoskeletal disorder affecting balance other than THA
  • Unstable cardiovascular or medical conditions that could interfere with participation
  • Inability to safely participate in balance training

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:治疗
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Pressure Biofeedback-Based Perturbation Balance Training Group
Participants will receive perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional physical therapy. The intervention will be conducted for 15 minutes per session, five times per week, for six weeks.
Participants performed perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback devices in addition to conventional physical therapy. During standing tasks, pressure biofeedback units were placed under both feet, and temporary instability was induced by adjusting air pressure to alter support surface stability. Participants performed progressive balance tasks including static standing, weight shifting, multidirectional reaching, and PNF-based reaching patterns. Training intensity and task difficulty were progressively increased according to participant performance. The intervention was conducted for 15 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks under therapist supervision.
有源比较器:Conventional Balance Training
Participants performed traditional balance training combined with conventional physical therapy. Training included static and dynamic balance exercises, weight shifting, postural control tasks, and functional reaching activities without pressure biofeedback. The intervention was conducted for 30 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks.
Participants in the control group received traditional balance training without pressure biofeedback. The intervention included static and dynamic balance exercises, postural control training, weight-shifting tasks, and posture transition activities. The training tasks were performed in the same sequence and progression as the experimental group, but without perturbation induced by pressure biofeedback devices. Participants received training for 30 minutes per session, 5 times per week, for 6 weeks in addition to conventional physical therapy.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Functional balance assessed with the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item performance-based scale scored from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Maximum forward reach distance in centimetres while standing, measured with the Functional Reach Test; greater distance indicates better dynamic balance.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Fall-related self-efficacy assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale; higher scores indicate greater confidence in performing activities without falling.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Hip function assessed with the Harris Hip Score, covering pain, function, deformity and range of motion, scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Lower-limb function assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, a 20-item self-report questionnaire scored from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better function.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

其他结果措施

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Mean COP velocity, eyes open (cm/s)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean velocity of centre-of-pressure displacement during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP root mean square distance, eyes closed (cm)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Root-mean-square distance of the centre-of-pressure from its mean position during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP 95% confidence ellipse area, eyes closed (cm^2)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Area of the 95% confidence ellipse fitted to the centre-of-pressure distribution during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP sway path length, eyes closed (cm)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Total length of the centre-of-pressure trajectory during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP mediolateral range, eyes closed (cm)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Range of centre-of-pressure excursion in the mediolateral direction during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean COP velocity, eyes closed (cm/s)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean velocity of centre-of-pressure displacement during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP mediolateral range, eyes open (cm)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Range of centre-of-pressure excursion in the mediolateral direction during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP sway path length, eyes open (cm)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Total length of the centre-of-pressure trajectory during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP 95% confidence ellipse area, eyes open (cm^2)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Area of the 95% confidence ellipse fitted to the centre-of-pressure distribution during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP root mean square distance, eyes open (cm)
大体时间:Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Root-mean-square distance of the centre-of-pressure from its mean position during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Deok Hoon Jun、Daegu University

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2025年10月28日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年3月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年3月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年8月24日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年8月26日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年8月28日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年8月28日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年8月26日

最后验证

2026年8月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • 1040621-202509-HR-074

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

未定

IPD 计划说明

The plan for sharing individual participant data has not yet been determined.

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅