Cette page a été traduite automatiquement et l'exactitude de la traduction n'est pas garantie. Veuillez vous référer au version anglaise pour un texte source.

Effects of Balance Training on Balance and Fall Confidence After Hip Replacement Surgery

26 août 2026 mis à jour par: Jun Deokhoon, Daegu University

Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Balance Ability and Fall Efficacy in Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback on balance ability, hip function, and falls efficacy in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thirty participants who underwent THA will be randomly assigned to either a perturbation-based balance training group or a conventional balance training group. Both groups will receive intervention five times per week for 6 weeks in addition to conventional physical therapy. Outcome measures include Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test, Falls Efficacy Scale, Harris Hip Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and center of pressure (COP) parameters. The study is expected to provide clinical evidence for improving balance control and reducing fall risk in patients after THA.

Aperçu de l'étude

Description détaillée

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly performed to reduce pain and improve functional mobility in patients with hip joint disorders. However, many patients continue to experience impaired balance control, decreased proprioception, muscle weakness, and fear of falling after surgery. These impairments may negatively affect gait stability, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

Traditional balance training programs mainly focus on static posture control and predictable weight-shifting tasks. However, such approaches may not adequately improve reactive postural control required for unexpected balance disturbances encountered during daily activities. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) has recently gained attention as an intervention designed to improve reactive balance control by exposing individuals to unexpected external disturbances and encouraging adaptive postural responses.

This study aims to investigate the effects of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in patients following total hip arthroplasty. The pressure biofeedback system provides controlled instability and real-time sensory feedback during balance tasks, allowing participants to improve postural control strategies and weight-shifting ability.

Thirty patients who underwent THA will be recruited and randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group will receive perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group will perform conventional balance training with conventional physical therapy. Interventions will be performed 5 times per week for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures will include balance performance assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and center of pressure (COP) parameters measured using a Wii Balance Board. Falls efficacy will be evaluated using the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). Hip function and lower extremity function will be assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

The findings of this study may provide evidence supporting the clinical applicability of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback as an effective rehabilitation strategy for improving postural stability and reducing fall risk after THA.

Type d'étude

Interventionnel

Inscription (Réel)

30

Phase

  • N'est pas applicable

Contacts et emplacements

Cette section fournit les coordonnées de ceux qui mènent l'étude et des informations sur le lieu où cette étude est menée.

Lieux d'étude

    • Gyeongsangbuk-do
      • Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Corée du Sud, 38453
        • Daegu University

Critères de participation

Les chercheurs recherchent des personnes qui correspondent à une certaine description, appelée critères d'éligibilité. Certains exemples de ces critères sont l'état de santé général d'une personne ou des traitements antérieurs.

Critère d'éligibilité

Âges éligibles pour étudier

  • Adulte
  • Adulte plus âgé

Accepte les volontaires sains

Non

La description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA)
  • Postoperative period between 2 weeks and 6 months
  • Ability to understand and follow therapist instructions
  • Able to stand independently with or without an assistive device
  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 21 and 45
  • Receiving inpatient rehabilitation and physical therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment (K-MMSE < 18)
  • Severe visual impairment or vestibular dysfunction
  • Any neurological or musculoskeletal disorder affecting balance other than THA
  • Unstable cardiovascular or medical conditions that could interfere with participation
  • Inability to safely participate in balance training

Plan d'étude

Cette section fournit des détails sur le plan d'étude, y compris la façon dont l'étude est conçue et ce que l'étude mesure.

Comment l'étude est-elle conçue ?

Détails de conception

  • Objectif principal: Traitement
  • Répartition: Randomisé
  • Modèle interventionnel: Affectation parallèle
  • Masquage: Aucun (étiquette ouverte)

Armes et Interventions

Groupe de participants / Bras
Intervention / Traitement
Expérimental: Pressure Biofeedback-Based Perturbation Balance Training Group
Participants will receive perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional physical therapy. The intervention will be conducted for 15 minutes per session, five times per week, for six weeks.
Participants performed perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback devices in addition to conventional physical therapy. During standing tasks, pressure biofeedback units were placed under both feet, and temporary instability was induced by adjusting air pressure to alter support surface stability. Participants performed progressive balance tasks including static standing, weight shifting, multidirectional reaching, and PNF-based reaching patterns. Training intensity and task difficulty were progressively increased according to participant performance. The intervention was conducted for 15 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks under therapist supervision.
Comparateur actif: Conventional Balance Training
Participants performed traditional balance training combined with conventional physical therapy. Training included static and dynamic balance exercises, weight shifting, postural control tasks, and functional reaching activities without pressure biofeedback. The intervention was conducted for 30 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks.
Participants in the control group received traditional balance training without pressure biofeedback. The intervention included static and dynamic balance exercises, postural control training, weight-shifting tasks, and posture transition activities. The training tasks were performed in the same sequence and progression as the experimental group, but without perturbation induced by pressure biofeedback devices. Participants received training for 30 minutes per session, 5 times per week, for 6 weeks in addition to conventional physical therapy.

Que mesure l'étude ?

Principaux critères de jugement

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Functional balance assessed with the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item performance-based scale scored from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Mesures de résultats secondaires

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Maximum forward reach distance in centimetres while standing, measured with the Functional Reach Test; greater distance indicates better dynamic balance.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Fall-related self-efficacy assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale; higher scores indicate greater confidence in performing activities without falling.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Hip function assessed with the Harris Hip Score, covering pain, function, deformity and range of motion, scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Lower-limb function assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, a 20-item self-report questionnaire scored from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better function.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Autres mesures de résultats

Mesure des résultats
Description de la mesure
Délai
Mean COP velocity, eyes open (cm/s)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean velocity of centre-of-pressure displacement during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP root mean square distance, eyes closed (cm)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Root-mean-square distance of the centre-of-pressure from its mean position during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP 95% confidence ellipse area, eyes closed (cm^2)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Area of the 95% confidence ellipse fitted to the centre-of-pressure distribution during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP sway path length, eyes closed (cm)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Total length of the centre-of-pressure trajectory during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP mediolateral range, eyes closed (cm)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Range of centre-of-pressure excursion in the mediolateral direction during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean COP velocity, eyes closed (cm/s)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean velocity of centre-of-pressure displacement during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP mediolateral range, eyes open (cm)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Range of centre-of-pressure excursion in the mediolateral direction during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP sway path length, eyes open (cm)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Total length of the centre-of-pressure trajectory during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP 95% confidence ellipse area, eyes open (cm^2)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Area of the 95% confidence ellipse fitted to the centre-of-pressure distribution during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP root mean square distance, eyes open (cm)
Délai: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Root-mean-square distance of the centre-of-pressure from its mean position during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Collaborateurs et enquêteurs

C'est ici que vous trouverez les personnes et les organisations impliquées dans cette étude.

Parrainer

Les enquêteurs

  • Chercheur principal: Deok Hoon Jun, Daegu University

Dates d'enregistrement des études

Ces dates suivent la progression des dossiers d'étude et des soumissions de résultats sommaires à ClinicalTrials.gov. Les dossiers d'étude et les résultats rapportés sont examinés par la Bibliothèque nationale de médecine (NLM) pour s'assurer qu'ils répondent à des normes de contrôle de qualité spécifiques avant d'être publiés sur le site Web public.

Dates principales de l'étude

Début de l'étude (Réel)

28 octobre 2025

Achèvement primaire (Réel)

1 mars 2026

Achèvement de l'étude (Réel)

1 mars 2026

Dates d'inscription aux études

Première soumission

24 août 2026

Première soumission répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 août 2026

Première publication (Réel)

28 août 2026

Mises à jour des dossiers d'étude

Dernière mise à jour publiée (Réel)

28 août 2026

Dernière mise à jour soumise répondant aux critères de contrôle qualité

26 août 2026

Dernière vérification

1 août 2026

Plus d'information

Termes liés à cette étude

Autres numéros d'identification d'étude

  • 1040621-202509-HR-074

Plan pour les données individuelles des participants (IPD)

Prévoyez-vous de partager les données individuelles des participants (DPI) ?

INDÉCIS

Description du régime IPD

The plan for sharing individual participant data has not yet been determined.

Informations sur les médicaments et les dispositifs, documents d'étude

Étudie un produit pharmaceutique réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Étudie un produit d'appareil réglementé par la FDA américaine

Non

Ces informations ont été extraites directement du site Web clinicaltrials.gov sans aucune modification. Si vous avez des demandes de modification, de suppression ou de mise à jour des détails de votre étude, veuillez contacter register@clinicaltrials.gov. Dès qu'un changement est mis en œuvre sur clinicaltrials.gov, il sera également mis à jour automatiquement sur notre site Web .

S'abonner