Esta página se tradujo automáticamente y no se garantiza la precisión de la traducción. por favor refiérase a versión inglesa para un texto fuente.

Effects of Balance Training on Balance and Fall Confidence After Hip Replacement Surgery

26 de agosto de 2026 actualizado por: Jun Deokhoon, Daegu University

Effects of Perturbation-Based Balance Training on Balance Ability and Fall Efficacy in Patients After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Randomized Controlled Trial

This randomized controlled study aims to investigate the effects of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback on balance ability, hip function, and falls efficacy in patients after total hip arthroplasty (THA). Thirty participants who underwent THA will be randomly assigned to either a perturbation-based balance training group or a conventional balance training group. Both groups will receive intervention five times per week for 6 weeks in addition to conventional physical therapy. Outcome measures include Berg Balance Scale, Functional Reach Test, Falls Efficacy Scale, Harris Hip Score, Lower Extremity Functional Scale, and center of pressure (COP) parameters. The study is expected to provide clinical evidence for improving balance control and reducing fall risk in patients after THA.

Descripción general del estudio

Descripción detallada

Total hip arthroplasty (THA) is commonly performed to reduce pain and improve functional mobility in patients with hip joint disorders. However, many patients continue to experience impaired balance control, decreased proprioception, muscle weakness, and fear of falling after surgery. These impairments may negatively affect gait stability, activities of daily living, and quality of life.

Traditional balance training programs mainly focus on static posture control and predictable weight-shifting tasks. However, such approaches may not adequately improve reactive postural control required for unexpected balance disturbances encountered during daily activities. Perturbation-based balance training (PBT) has recently gained attention as an intervention designed to improve reactive balance control by exposing individuals to unexpected external disturbances and encouraging adaptive postural responses.

This study aims to investigate the effects of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in patients following total hip arthroplasty. The pressure biofeedback system provides controlled instability and real-time sensory feedback during balance tasks, allowing participants to improve postural control strategies and weight-shifting ability.

Thirty patients who underwent THA will be recruited and randomly assigned to either an experimental group or a control group. The experimental group will receive perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional physical therapy, while the control group will perform conventional balance training with conventional physical therapy. Interventions will be performed 5 times per week for 6 weeks.

Outcome measures will include balance performance assessed by the Berg Balance Scale (BBS), Functional Reach Test (FRT), and center of pressure (COP) parameters measured using a Wii Balance Board. Falls efficacy will be evaluated using the Falls Efficacy Scale (FES). Hip function and lower extremity function will be assessed using the Harris Hip Score (HHS) and Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS).

The findings of this study may provide evidence supporting the clinical applicability of perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback as an effective rehabilitation strategy for improving postural stability and reducing fall risk after THA.

Tipo de estudio

Intervencionista

Inscripción (Actual)

30

Fase

  • No aplica

Contactos y Ubicaciones

Esta sección proporciona los datos de contacto de quienes realizan el estudio e información sobre dónde se lleva a cabo este estudio.

Ubicaciones de estudio

    • Gyeongsangbuk-do
      • Gyeongsan-si, Gyeongsangbuk-do, Corea del Sur, 38453
        • Daegu University

Criterios de participación

Los investigadores buscan personas que se ajusten a una determinada descripción, denominada criterio de elegibilidad. Algunos ejemplos de estos criterios son el estado de salud general de una persona o tratamientos previos.

Criterio de elegibilidad

Edades elegibles para estudiar

  • Adulto
  • Adulto Mayor

Acepta Voluntarios Saludables

No

Descripción

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients who underwent total hip arthroplasty (THA)
  • Postoperative period between 2 weeks and 6 months
  • Ability to understand and follow therapist instructions
  • Able to stand independently with or without an assistive device
  • Berg Balance Scale (BBS) score between 21 and 45
  • Receiving inpatient rehabilitation and physical therapy

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Severe cognitive impairment (K-MMSE < 18)
  • Severe visual impairment or vestibular dysfunction
  • Any neurological or musculoskeletal disorder affecting balance other than THA
  • Unstable cardiovascular or medical conditions that could interfere with participation
  • Inability to safely participate in balance training

Plan de estudios

Esta sección proporciona detalles del plan de estudio, incluido cómo está diseñado el estudio y qué mide el estudio.

¿Cómo está diseñado el estudio?

Detalles de diseño

  • Propósito principal: Tratamiento
  • Asignación: Aleatorizado
  • Modelo Intervencionista: Asignación paralela
  • Enmascaramiento: Ninguno (etiqueta abierta)

Armas e Intervenciones

Grupo de participantes/brazo
Intervención / Tratamiento
Experimental: Pressure Biofeedback-Based Perturbation Balance Training Group
Participants will receive perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback in addition to conventional physical therapy. The intervention will be conducted for 15 minutes per session, five times per week, for six weeks.
Participants performed perturbation-based balance training using pressure biofeedback devices in addition to conventional physical therapy. During standing tasks, pressure biofeedback units were placed under both feet, and temporary instability was induced by adjusting air pressure to alter support surface stability. Participants performed progressive balance tasks including static standing, weight shifting, multidirectional reaching, and PNF-based reaching patterns. Training intensity and task difficulty were progressively increased according to participant performance. The intervention was conducted for 15 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks under therapist supervision.
Comparador activo: Conventional Balance Training
Participants performed traditional balance training combined with conventional physical therapy. Training included static and dynamic balance exercises, weight shifting, postural control tasks, and functional reaching activities without pressure biofeedback. The intervention was conducted for 30 minutes per session, 5 sessions per week, for 6 weeks.
Participants in the control group received traditional balance training without pressure biofeedback. The intervention included static and dynamic balance exercises, postural control training, weight-shifting tasks, and posture transition activities. The training tasks were performed in the same sequence and progression as the experimental group, but without perturbation induced by pressure biofeedback devices. Participants received training for 30 minutes per session, 5 times per week, for 6 weeks in addition to conventional physical therapy.

¿Qué mide el estudio?

Medidas de resultado primarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Berg Balance Scale (BBS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Functional balance assessed with the Berg Balance Scale, a 14-item performance-based scale scored from 0 to 56, with higher scores indicating better balance.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Medidas de resultado secundarias

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Functional Reach Test (FRT)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Maximum forward reach distance in centimetres while standing, measured with the Functional Reach Test; greater distance indicates better dynamic balance.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Falls Efficacy Scale (FES)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Fall-related self-efficacy assessed with the Falls Efficacy Scale; higher scores indicate greater confidence in performing activities without falling.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Harris Hip Score (HHS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Hip function assessed with the Harris Hip Score, covering pain, function, deformity and range of motion, scored from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better hip function.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Lower Extremity Functional Scale (LEFS)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Lower-limb function assessed with the Lower Extremity Functional Scale, a 20-item self-report questionnaire scored from 0 to 80, with higher scores indicating better function.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Otras medidas de resultado

Medida de resultado
Medida Descripción
Periodo de tiempo
Mean COP velocity, eyes open (cm/s)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean velocity of centre-of-pressure displacement during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP root mean square distance, eyes closed (cm)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Root-mean-square distance of the centre-of-pressure from its mean position during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP 95% confidence ellipse area, eyes closed (cm^2)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Area of the 95% confidence ellipse fitted to the centre-of-pressure distribution during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP sway path length, eyes closed (cm)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Total length of the centre-of-pressure trajectory during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP mediolateral range, eyes closed (cm)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Range of centre-of-pressure excursion in the mediolateral direction during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean COP velocity, eyes closed (cm/s)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Mean velocity of centre-of-pressure displacement during quiet standing with eyes closed, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP mediolateral range, eyes open (cm)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Range of centre-of-pressure excursion in the mediolateral direction during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP sway path length, eyes open (cm)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Total length of the centre-of-pressure trajectory during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP 95% confidence ellipse area, eyes open (cm^2)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Area of the 95% confidence ellipse fitted to the centre-of-pressure distribution during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
COP root mean square distance, eyes open (cm)
Periodo de tiempo: Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention
Root-mean-square distance of the centre-of-pressure from its mean position during quiet standing with eyes open, measured with a Nintendo Wii Balance Board and Balancia software; mean of three 30-second trials.
Baseline and after 6 weeks of intervention

Colaboradores e Investigadores

Aquí es donde encontrará personas y organizaciones involucradas en este estudio.

Patrocinador

Investigadores

  • Investigador principal: Deok Hoon Jun, Daegu University

Fechas de registro del estudio

Estas fechas rastrean el progreso del registro del estudio y los envíos de resultados resumidos a ClinicalTrials.gov. Los registros del estudio y los resultados informados son revisados ​​por la Biblioteca Nacional de Medicina (NLM) para asegurarse de que cumplan con los estándares de control de calidad específicos antes de publicarlos en el sitio web público.

Fechas importantes del estudio

Inicio del estudio (Actual)

28 de octubre de 2025

Finalización primaria (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2026

Finalización del estudio (Actual)

1 de marzo de 2026

Fechas de registro del estudio

Enviado por primera vez

24 de agosto de 2026

Primero enviado que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de agosto de 2026

Publicado por primera vez (Actual)

28 de agosto de 2026

Actualizaciones de registros de estudio

Última actualización publicada (Actual)

28 de agosto de 2026

Última actualización enviada que cumplió con los criterios de control de calidad

26 de agosto de 2026

Última verificación

1 de agosto de 2026

Más información

Términos relacionados con este estudio

Otros números de identificación del estudio

  • 1040621-202509-HR-074

Plan de datos de participantes individuales (IPD)

¿Planea compartir datos de participantes individuales (IPD)?

INDECISO

Descripción del plan IPD

The plan for sharing individual participant data has not yet been determined.

Información sobre medicamentos y dispositivos, documentos del estudio

Estudia un producto farmacéutico regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Estudia un producto de dispositivo regulado por la FDA de EE. UU.

No

Esta información se obtuvo directamente del sitio web clinicaltrials.gov sin cambios. Si tiene alguna solicitud para cambiar, eliminar o actualizar los detalles de su estudio, comuníquese con register@clinicaltrials.gov. Tan pronto como se implemente un cambio en clinicaltrials.gov, también se actualizará automáticamente en nuestro sitio web. .

Suscribir