此页面是自动翻译的,不保证翻译的准确性。请参阅 英文版 对于源文本。

Effects of Two Teaching Methods on Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Medical Errors

2026年9月12日 更新者:Saglik Bilimleri Universitesi

The Effect of Patient Safety Education Delivered Through Two Different Teaching Methods on Nursing Students' Attitudes Toward Medical Errors: A Randomized Controlled Trial

The aim of this study is to compare the effects of patient safety education delivered through the Pecha Kucha method, scenario-based teaching, and traditional teaching on nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. Research Hypotheses: H1: Patient safety education delivered through the Pecha Kucha method significantly improves nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. H2: Scenario-based patient safety education significantly improves nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. H3: Nursing students who receive patient safety education through the Pecha Kucha method demonstrate significantly greater improvement in their attitudes toward medical errors than those in the control group. H4: Nursing students who receive scenario-based patient safety education demonstrate significantly greater improvement in their attitudes toward medical errors than those in the control group. H5: There is a significant difference between the Pecha Kucha method and scenario-based teaching in terms of changes in nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. This study is designed as a three-arm, parallel-group, randomized controlled trial with a pretest-posttest design to evaluate the effects of two different teaching methods for patient safety education on nursing students' attitudes toward medical errors. Participants will be randomly assigned to one of the following three groups: Group 1 (Pecha Kucha Group): Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the Pecha Kucha teaching method. Group 2 (Scenario-Based Learning Group): Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using a scenario-based teaching method. Group 3 (Control Group): Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the traditional lecture-based teaching method, which represents the routine educational approach.

研究概览

研究类型

介入性

注册 (实际的)

98

阶段

  • 不适用

联系人和位置

本节提供了进行研究的人员的详细联系信息,以及有关进行该研究的地点的信息。

学习地点

    • Üsküdar
      • Istanbul、Üsküdar、土耳其(türkiye)
        • University of Health Sciences Turkey

参与标准

研究人员寻找符合特定描述的人,称为资格标准。这些标准的一些例子是一个人的一般健康状况或先前的治疗。

资格标准

适合学习的年龄

  • 成人
  • 年长者

接受健康志愿者

是的

描述

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Being a first-year student at the University of Health Sciences, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing
  • Attending the "Ethics in Nursing" course
  • Agreeing to participate in the study
  • Being 18 years of age or older
  • Not having previously taken a course on patient safety

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Declining to participate in the study
  • Wishing to withdraw from the study at any stage
  • Incompletely filling out the study's data collection form.

学习计划

本节提供研究计划的详细信息,包括研究的设计方式和研究的衡量标准。

研究是如何设计的?

设计细节

  • 主要用途:其他
  • 分配:随机化
  • 介入模型:并行分配
  • 屏蔽:无(打开标签)

武器和干预

参与者组/臂
干预/治疗
实验性的:Pecha Kucha Group
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the Pecha Kucha teaching method. The intervention consists of a structured presentation format designed to promote active learning, engagement, and concise knowledge delivery.
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using the Pecha Kucha teaching method. The intervention consists of a structured presentation format designed to promote active learning, engagement, and concise knowledge delivery.
实验性的:Scenario-Based Learning Group
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using a scenario-based teaching method. The intervention incorporates realistic clinical scenarios to enhance critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and decision-making related to patient safety.
Participants will receive patient safety education delivered using a scenario-based teaching method. The intervention incorporates realistic clinical scenarios to enhance critical thinking, clinical reasoning, and decision-making related to patient safety.
有源比较器:Control Group
Participants will receive patient safety education through the traditional lecture-based teaching method routinely used in the nursing curriculum.
Participants will receive patient safety education through the traditional lecture-based teaching method routinely used in the nursing curriculum.

研究衡量的是什么?

主要结果指标

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Medical Error Attitude Scale (MEAS)
大体时间:Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after the intervention

Participants' attitudes toward medical errors will be assessed using the Medical Error Attitude Scale (MEAS). Total scale scores will be compared among the Pecha Kucha, scenario-based learning, and control groups to evaluate the effectiveness of the educational interventions.

The instrument consists of 16 items across three subscales: Perception of Medical Errors, Approach to Medical Errors, and Causes of Medical Errors. Each item is rated on a 5-point Likert scale, and the overall score ranges from 1 to 5. A mean score of 3 or higher indicates a positive attitude toward medical errors, whereas a score below 3 indicates a negative attitude. Higher scores indicate more positive attitudes toward medical error prevention, reporting, and patient safety.

Baseline (before the intervention) and immediately after the intervention

次要结果测量

结果测量
措施说明
大体时间
Adult Education Satisfaction Scale (AESS)
大体时间:Immediately after the intervention

Participants' satisfaction with the educational intervention will be evaluated using the Adult Education Satisfaction Scale. Total scale scores will be assessed immediately after completion of the educational intervention to determine participants' satisfaction with the teaching methods.

The scale comprises 30 items organized into six subscales and is scored on a 5-point Likert scale, yielding a total score ranging from 30 to 150. Higher scores indicate greater satisfaction with the educational intervention. The AESS evaluates participants' satisfaction with the educational program and the extent to which it achieves its intended learning objectives.

Immediately after the intervention

合作者和调查者

在这里您可以找到参与这项研究的人员和组织。

调查人员

  • 首席研究员:Semra Aciksoz、University of Health Sciences Turkey, Hamidiye Faculty of Nursing

研究记录日期

这些日期跟踪向 ClinicalTrials.gov 提交研究记录和摘要结果的进度。研究记录和报告的结果由国家医学图书馆 (NLM) 审查,以确保它们在发布到公共网站之前符合特定的质量控制标准。

研究主要日期

学习开始 (实际的)

2026年4月24日

初级完成 (实际的)

2026年6月1日

研究完成 (实际的)

2026年7月1日

研究注册日期

首次提交

2026年9月4日

首先提交符合 QC 标准的

2026年9月12日

首次发布 (实际的)

2026年9月16日

研究记录更新

最后更新发布 (实际的)

2026年9月16日

上次提交的符合 QC 标准的更新

2026年9月12日

最后验证

2026年7月1日

更多信息

与本研究相关的术语

其他研究编号

  • UHealthScience SemraAciksoz

计划个人参与者数据 (IPD)

计划共享个人参与者数据 (IPD)?

不

药物和器械信息、研究文件

研究美国 FDA 监管的药品

不

研究美国 FDA 监管的设备产品

不

此信息直接从 clinicaltrials.gov 网站检索,没有任何更改。如果您有任何更改、删除或更新研究详细信息的请求,请联系 register@clinicaltrials.gov. clinicaltrials.gov 上实施更改,我们的网站上也会自动更新.

订阅