Postoperative Oral Intake Trial

September 2, 2011 updated by: University Hospital of North Norway

Postoperative Enteral Feeding or Early Oral Intake at Will. Effects on Clinical Outcome

Complete fasting until resumed bowel function after upper abdominal surgery is not beneficial. Enteral feeding has been claimed to be the preferred way of delivering nutritional support postoperatively. Increasing evidence suggests that letting patients eat ("voluntary oral feeding" or "oral intake at will") from the day after the operation is safe. No prospective randomised trial has been undertaken to compare these two regimens. In this study, the investigators will randomise 444 patients, subject to major upper abdominal surgery, into receiving either continuous enteral feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy until resumed bowel function, or to oral intake at will from postoperative day 1. The main endpoints are the incidence rate of major complications and death, as well as a Quality of Life assessment.

Null-Hypothesis:

Routine postoperative feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy after major, upper abdominal surgery has no clinically relevant advantages over early oral intake at will.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Complete fasting until resumed bowel function after upper abdominal surgery is not beneficial. Enteral feeding has been claimed to be the preferred way of delivering nutritional support postoperatively. Increasing evidence suggests that letting patients eat ("voluntary oral feeding" or "oral intake at will") from the day after the operation is safe. No prospective randomised trial has been undertaken to compare these two regimens. In this study, we will randomise 444 patients, subject to major upper abdominal surgery, into receiving either continuous enteral feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy until resumed bowel function, or to oral intake at will from postoperative day 1. The main endpoints are the incidence rate of major complications and death, as well as a Quality of Life assessment.

Null-Hypothesis:

Routine postoperative feeding by needle catheter jejunostomy after major, upper abdominal surgery has no clinically relevant advantages over early oral intake at will.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

450

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Tromsø
      • Tromsø,, Tromsø, Norway, 9038
        • University Hospital Northern Norway,

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adults subject to major, upper, open abdominal surgery (exceeding simple cholecystectomies and fundoplications)

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Crohns disease
  • Mentally disabled
  • Pre-op dependency on intravenous (IV) nutrition
  • Expected life duration of less than 3 months

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Major complications within 8 weeks postoperatively

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Quality of Life
Minor complications
Use of analgesics
Post-laparotomy bowel movement

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Chair: Arthur Revhaug, Professor, University of Northern Norway

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

February 1, 2001

Study Completion

June 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 22, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 22, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

August 24, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 2, 2011

Last Verified

September 1, 2011

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • NFR 147339/320

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe