Treatment Study of Soft Palatal Implants in Obstructive Sleep Apnea

May 18, 2011 updated by: Mayo Clinic

A Randomized, Controlled Treatment Trial of Soft Palatal Implants and Positive Airway Pressure in Mild to Moderate Obstructive Sleep Apnea and Snoring

The purpose of the study is to compare the effectiveness of soft palatal implants with placebo and continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA), frequently associated with disruptive snoring, is a prevalent disorder which is increasingly recognized by health care providers and lay people alike as an important factor in impaired daytime executive function as well as cardiovascular disease risk. Along with an increase in its recognition and diagnosis have come a growing pool of patients with milder disease and the associated challenge of ideal management. Positive airway pressure (PAP) is well established as the mainstay of treatment for OSA since it is effective at reversing daytime neurocognitive sequelae and may be a useful adjunct to therapy in those with cardiovascular disease coexisting with OSA. In patients with mild OSA, however, the response to PAP therapy appears muted, which is related in part to poor adherence to treatment. In response, a number of alternative treatments have evolved. The most recent innovation is soft palatal implants, which, in non-randomized, uncontrolled studies have demonstrated reasonable efficacy in the treatment of snoring and mild to moderate OSA. How the implants compare with standard therapy and their effect on cardiovascular variables are unknown. Because of the ease and rapidity with which this system is implanted, and because treatment effect is independent of patient compliance, there is high potential for widespread use in patients with milder OSA. We therefore are conducting a randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to compare the impact of palatal implants with PAP on sleep disordered breathing, daytime symptoms and blood pressure, as well as patient / bed partner acceptance.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

64

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Minnesota
      • Rochester, Minnesota, United States, 55905
        • Mayo Clinic

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 80 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

INCLUSION CRITERIA

  1. Age >18 yrs
  2. AHI 5-30
  3. Tonsil size <50% of airway
  4. No anatomically fixed nasal stenosis
  5. BMI = 32 kg/m2 EXCLUSION CRITERIA

1. The presence of a concomitant untreated primary sleep disorder (restless legs syndrome, narcolepsy, idiopathic hypersomnia) 2. Severe daytime sleepiness (history of sleep-related motor vehicle or occupational accident) 3. Moderate to severe pulmonary disease (FEV1 <50% pred) 4. Neurologic impairment (h/o CVA, TIA, neuromuscular disease, diaphragmatic paralysis) 5. Significant cardiac disease (LVEF<50%, moderate to severe valvular disease) 6. Uncontrolled hypertension >180/110 7. Renal disease (Scr > 2.5) 8. Allergy to local anesthetics used for implantation procedure. 9. Pregnant or nursing women

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Other: Positive airway pressure (PAP)
which is air delivered by a mask worn over the nose during sleep
which is air delivered by a mask worn over the nose during sleep
Active Comparator: outpatient surgical procedure
where small fabric rods are inserted into the soft palate (the fleshy portion of the roof of the mouth) to stiffen the tissues.
Sham Comparator: Sham surgery
an outpatient surgical procedure identical to #2 except that no rods are inserted into the soft palate.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
apnea-hypopnea index
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
sleepiness
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
quality of life
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
ambulatory blood pressure
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days
snoring
Time Frame: 90 days
90 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Sean M. Caples, D.O., Mayo Clinic

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2005

Primary Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

December 7, 2005

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

December 7, 2005

First Posted (Estimate)

December 9, 2005

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 20, 2011

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 18, 2011

Last Verified

May 1, 2011

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe