Acupuncture for Acute and Chronic Pain in Air Force Personnel

September 4, 2007 updated by: Samueli Institute for Information Biology

Outcomes and Cost Assessment of Acupuncture in the Treatment (OCAT) of Pain Patients at Malcolm Grow USAF Medical Center

The purpose of this project is to conduct a scientifically rigorous investigation of the clinical outcomes, quality of life, and cost associated with the delivery of acupuncture in the treatment of acute and chronic pain in patients at Malcolm Grow Medical Center, Andrews Air Force Base.

The specific aims of this study are to:

  1. Gather outcomes and patient satisfaction data on patients receiving acupuncture treatment for acute and chronic pain.
  2. Perform an analysis of costs, including any system cost savings, associated with providing acupuncture services to pain patients.
  3. Serve as a model to expand the project to Scott AFB and Travis AFB as per the request of the Air Mobility Command Surgeon General. (AMC/SG).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Adult patients referred to the MGMC Acupuncture Clinic for this study must have an established Western medical diagnosis, have exhausted all standards of care for the reduction and/or resolution of pain, meet the inclusion and exclusion criteria and be clinically evaluated prior to entry in the study. 1000 patients will be entered into the study; no male and female patient ratios will be required. Patients under 18 years of age will be excluded. There are no upper age limits.

Acupuncture point(s) selection and acupuncture techniques will be individualized for each patient. All treatments will be approved by the physician principal investigator. Treatment will generally be administered with the patient either prone, supine, or seated position. Standards of reporting interventions in controlled trials of acupuncture, based on STRICTA requirements, will be followed. The following acupuncture data will be collected:

  • Acupuncture point locations (palpation or electronic detection)
  • Techniques employed: (e.g. dry needling, acupuncture, electro-acupuncture , auriculotherapy, electro-auriculotherapy, laser, piezo-electrical stimulation micro-current techniques, E-field)
  • Types of needles employed (e.g. ASP gold/stainless steel, needle tacks, Seirin needles, etc.)

Baseline demographic data and information on pain levels (using the Numerical Rating Scale), patient satisfaction (using the Patient Satisfaction Questionnaire), functional health status (using the SF-8), and concomitant medical care (including medication use) will be collected prior to treatment. Follow-up data on pain levels and concomitant medical care will be collected via telephone 24 hours, 1 week, 2 weeks, and 4 weeks post-therapy. Patient satisfaction and functional health status data will be collecetd again at 4 weeks post-treatment. Relapses of pain will be noted and appropriately evaluated. In addition, the following clinical data will be collected:

  • Subjective, Objective, Assessment, and Treatment(SOAP) parameters
  • Medication use
  • Range of motion

A cost analysis will be performed by comparing patients who seek acupuncture treatment to those who receive only conventional medical care during the same time period, by matching cohorts based on ICD-9 diagnostic codes and basic demographic information.

A series of appropriate parametric and nonparametric tests will be performed to look for pre-post differences in patient outcomes on a number of relevant baseline variables; including demographic information, intensity and duration of pain, SF-8 scores, patient satisfaction, and utilization of concomitant medical services.

An ancillary study will be conducted to investigate personality factors and pretreatment expectations as predictors of treatment outcome of medical acupuncture. Specific Aims of this ancillary study include:

  1. To assess perceived health outcomes after acupuncture treatment by military medical acupuncturists.
  2. To identify psychosocial and demographic predictors of perceived health outcomes from acupuncture treatment by military medical acupuncturists.
  3. To help clarify which patients are more likely to respond to acupuncture and hence more likely to benefit from a referral to a trained medical acupuncturist.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment

200

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maryland
      • Andrews AFB, Maryland, United States, 20762
        • Malcolm Grow Medical Center (MGMC), Andrews Air Force Base

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Western diagnosis of acute or chronic pain syndromes
  • Previously treated western standard of care
  • Written Informed Consent
  • Over the age of 18

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling or unable to participate in study treatment and follow-up
  • Unable to give informed consent for any reason
  • Allergic reaction to adhesive tape, gold or other components of the acupuncture needles
  • Pregnancy
  • Pacemaker
  • Electronic stimulator of any sort
  • Herbal preparations

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Factorial Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Level of Pain at Conclusion of Study, as measured by using a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS)
Time Frame: Baseline; Final assessment
Baseline; Final assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Pain Level, as measured by using a 0-10 Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) and Medication Use
Time Frame: Baseline; Immediately after tx; 24 hours after tx
Baseline; Immediately after tx; 24 hours after tx

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: COL Richard C Niemtzow, MD, PhD, MPH, United States Air Force

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

March 1, 2005

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2006

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 1, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 1, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 3, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

September 5, 2007

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 4, 2007

Last Verified

September 1, 2007

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • CRO-04-01
  • FMG2005-0002H

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe