A Comprehensive Practice-Friendly Model for Promoting Healthy Behaviors

July 18, 2012 updated by: Virginia Commonwealth University
Using an electronic health record to link the resources of primary care practices and community programs will help patients to improve their diet and exercise, quit smoking, and moderate their drinking.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

We posit that practice systems to promote healthy behaviors must combine five attributes to be effective and sustainable. They must be comprehensive (addressing multiple behaviors and the "5 As"), flexible (offering options), generalizable to ordinary practices, practice-friendly (limiting burden), and apply the Chronic Care Model. We will test the effectiveness and implementation of an innovative "packaged" intervention with these features. Six ACORN-affiliated practices will adopt a brief (3 minute) routine to deliver A1-3 (Ask, Advise, Agree) in the office and to offer patients four options for intensive assistance (Assist [A4], Arrange [A5]) outside the office. Patients can select 9 months of online, telephone, or group counseling; or usual care. An electronic health record (EHR) will expedite the in-office intervention and referrals. Outcome measures will include health behaviors (derived from 7200 surveys administered pre-intervention and 3 and 9 months post-exposure) and implementation (derived from EHR data, "counselee" surveys, and patient/staff interviews). We hypothesize that implementing this novel "package" of interventions will be associated with improved health behaviors (using the Common Measures for physical activity, diet, smoking, and alcohol use). EHR-captured data will measure RE-AIM parameters, including Reach (14 sub-measures), Adoption, and Maintenance. Surveys and qualitative analysis of semi-structured interviews with patients and office staff will explore Implementation issues and suggested improvements. We hope to demonstrate that this innovative intervention not only promotes healthy behaviors but is feasible and sustainable in primary care. Accomplishing these goals requires a delicate balancing act--deploying evidence-based strategies that are effective in lifestyle change but limit demands for new staff, training, or time. We strike this balance by harnessing effective technologies and tools and by leveraging resources outside the practice. If our intervention helps patients change unhealthy behaviors and is appealing to ordinary practices, we envision the potential for widespread adoption and substantial population health benefits.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

5670

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Newport News, Virginia, United States, 23666
        • Riverside Physicians Associates

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

All individuals over the age of 8 years presenting for care in 9 primary care practices

Exclusion Criteria:

None

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Health behaviors (diet, exercise, smoking status, and alcohol use
Time Frame: 4 and 9 months post intervention
4 and 9 months post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Intervention's Reach, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance
Time Frame: At the time of delivery of care
At the time of delivery of care

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Alex Krist, MD, Virginia Commonwealth University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

June 1, 2006

Primary Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2007

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 15, 2006

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 15, 2006

First Posted (Estimate)

February 16, 2006

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 20, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 18, 2012

Last Verified

July 1, 2012

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 6268 (Gazi University Project of Science Investigation)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe