Continuous Exhaled Breath Condensate pH in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

August 6, 2008 updated by: University of Virginia

Phase 2 Continuous Exhaled Breath Condensate pH in Mechanically Ventilated Patients

Given the possible prognostic relationship between exhaled breath condensate pH and clinical symptoms, it is quite plausible that exhaled breath condensate pH can prove useful in the intensive care unit. For example, if exhaled breath condensate pH falls prior to the onset of clinical symptoms, it is likely that it can be useful as an early marker, heralding the onset of various inflammatory lung diseases. Specifically, exhaled breath condensate pH could be used as a safe, non-invasive screening tool for Ventilator Associated Pneumonia. Similarly, just as changes in exhaled breath condensate pH might predict the onset of disease, exhaled breath condensate pH changes might also mark the progression or resolution of disease (e.g. alerting clinicians to possible readiness for extubation). Although such notions are hypothetical, they are beginning to be supported by anecdotal evidence.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The investigators have developed a method of collecting exhaled breath condensate pH continually from ventilated patients, which (1) takes samples from an exhaust port on the outside of the ventilator circuit, and (2) possesses no measurable resistance to the ventilator circuit (and, therefore the sampling procedure in no way affects the patient).

Now, additionally, we have performed the continuous collection process on 10 patients in the intensive care units, none of whom have had any ill effects from the collection process.

The placement of the exhaled breath condensate collection device on the ventilator exhaust port offers a simplified, accurate, and safe method of investigating the relationships between airway pH and various pulmonary inflammatory disease processes in intubated patients of all ages.

In order to further extend our study of airway pH in intubated subjects, we believe it is necessary to obtain more frequent exhaled breath condensate pH measurements from intubated subjects. To that end, we have developed a collection system that will also measure the pH of the collected exhaled breath condensate in a fashion similar to the methodology used for thousands of assays in our laboratory and other laboratories globally. This involves deaeration of the sample to remove carbon dioxide. In the lab environment, this is performed with Argon. In the ICU setting, we will accomplish the same effect by using wall oxygen.

The continuous exhaled breath condensate pH collection and assay system consists of a condenser attached to the exhaust port of the ventilator. The condenser is kept chilled to slightly above freezing temperature by a refrigeration system commonly employed in ICU settings. The collection device stays attached to the exhalation port of the ventilator continuously, for hours to days.

Collected exhaled breath condensate is channeled into two deaeration chambers, through which wall oxygen is bubbled (total flow of 1 liter/min). In the second deaeration chamber, a micro pH electrode is inserted. This pH electrode is attached to a pH recorder that has internal memory that can record essentially an infinite number of measurements, allowing for any length duration of monitoring. This recorder has been evaluated by clinical engineering for radio frequency and other interference and is cleared for hospital use.

After measurement of pH, exhaled breath condensate is channeled into a waste chamber.

The breath condensate collection system is maintained chilled by a "hospital grade" Electri-Cool II model 767 refrigerated cooling system (or near-equivalent) that is clinically approved for use in the intensive care units. This device is approximately 30 cm on a side, and is kept on a wheeled cart out of the way of any clinical activity.

Hypothesis to be Tested: Clearly state the objectives and hypotheses and clearly define the primary and any secondary outcome measures.

  1. Exhaled breath condensate pH will have greater within-hour variability in subjects with lung disease than in subjects intubated for non-pulmonary reasons.
  2. Exhaled breath condensate pH will rise prior to readiness for extubation in infants and toddlers requiring mechanical ventilation for acute bronchiolitis.
  3. A decline in exhaled breath condensate pH or an increase in exhaled breath condensate pH variability will predict the onset of pulmonary inflammatory processes (such as ventilator-associated pneumonia) in those who initially require mechanical ventilation for non-inflammatory reasons.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Anticipated)

120

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Virginia
      • Charlottesville, Virginia, United States, 22908
        • Recruiting
        • University of Virginia
        • Contact:
        • Contact:

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 hour and older (Child, Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Any intubated patients, aged birth to adulthood, who are on a ventilator in any University of Virginia (UVA) intensive care unit.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Control subjects may not be taking oral or inhaled steroids or have asthma, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), cystic fibrosis, bacterial or viral pneumonitis, or adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: John F Hunt, MD, University of Virginia

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2004

Study Completion (Anticipated)

January 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 30, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 30, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

February 1, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 7, 2008

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 6, 2008

Last Verified

August 1, 2008

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe