Redesigning Cardiac Surgery to Reduce Neurologic Injury

May 14, 2013 updated by: David J. Malenka, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Neurologic injuries are frequent and devastating complications following cardiac surgery. Previous work conducted by our research group and others has identified the principal mechanisms creating both overt and subtle neurologic injuries after cardiac surgery. Current work by our group has identified that the causes (thrombotic/lipid emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion & hypotension, and gaseous emboli) of these injuries are byproducts of processes of surgical and perfusion care. This insight suggests that the redesign of clinical strategies and techniques to prevent the occurrence of these intraoperative sources of damage may provide an opportunity to reduce the risk of neurologic injury after cardiac surgery.

The goal of this research is to identify modifiable clinical strategies and techniques of surgical and perfusion care associated with the causes (thrombotic/lipid emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion & hypotension, and gaseous emboli) of neurologic injury secondary to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and subsequently to redesign these processes to reduce a patient's risk of a neurologic injury.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Detailed Description

The goal of this research is to identify modifiable clinical strategies and techniques of surgical and perfusion care associated with the causes (thrombotic/lipid emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion & hypotension, and gaseous emboli) of neurologic injury secondary to coronary artery bypass graft (CABG) surgery, and subsequently to redesign these processes to reduce a patient's risk of a neurologic injury. The following hypotheses will be addressed.

Hypothesis #1a. Identifying alternative strategies for conducting processes of surgical and perfusion care will reveal opportunities to reduce the occurrence of causes of neurologic injury. The most common mechanisms creating neurologic injury, whether focal or global, after CABG surgery are thrombotic/lipid emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion & hypotension, and gaseous emboli. Processes of surgical and perfusion care are associated with the creation of each of these causes of neurologic injury.

Hypothesis #1b. Redesigning processes of surgical and perfusion care to reduce thrombotic/lipid emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion & hypotension, and gaseous emboli during CABG surgery will result in reductions of tissue-level and neurologic injury. We will analyze sera for tissue-level brain injury as well as identify any new neurologic injuries present among patients undergoing CABG surgery. Redesigning CABG surgery to reduce thrombotic/lipid emboli, cerebral hypoperfusion & hypotension, and gaseous emboli will result in decreases in tissue-level and neurologic injury.

Hypothesis #2. A regional quality improvement intervention will result in changes to surgical and perfusion techniques. Regional dissemination of the findings from Hypotheses #1a,b may be realized through focused quality improvement initiatives utilizing multidisciplinary clinical teams.

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

469

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Maine
      • Portland, Maine, United States, 04102
        • Maine Medical Center
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
        • Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
      • Manchester, New Hampshire, United States, 03102
        • Catholic Medical Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

40 years to 89 years (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

Patients undergoing cardiac surgery.

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients aged 40-89 years undergoing nonemergency coronary revascularization or valve procedures with or without the use of a cardiopulmonary bypass circuit.

Exclusion Criteria:

- Undergoing concomitant procedures besides cardiac surgery

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Emboli and Hypoperfusion Counts
Time Frame: within the operative time period
We will count the number of thrombotic/lipid emboli and number of gaseous emboli. Along with the number of hypotensive events. We will link counts to surgical and perfusion techniques.
within the operative time period

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Type I and II neurologic injuries
Time Frame: within 3 months after surgery
We will measure a patient's neurologic status Using a Telephone Interview for Cognitive Status tool at 3 time periods (prior to surgery, prior to discharge and at 3 months)
within 3 months after surgery
Tissue-level neurologic injury
Time Frame: within 48 hrs of surgery
Blood for serum markers will be collected after surgery. We will assess plasma levels of biochemical markers of neurology injury.
within 48 hrs of surgery

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Donald S Likosky, Ph.D., Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center
  • Study Director: David J. Malenka, MD, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2002

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 1, 2011

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2012

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 7, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 7, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

February 8, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

May 16, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 14, 2013

Last Verified

May 1, 2013

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 20307
  • 1K02HS015663-01A1 (U.S. AHRQ Grant/Contract)

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Cardiovascular Disease

Clinical Trials on Quality improvement intervention

3
Subscribe