Stem Cell Therapy as Adjunct to Revascularization (STAR)

June 10, 2014 updated by: US Department of Veterans Affairs

Stem Cell Therapy as Adjunct to Revascularization: STAR

The purpose of this study is to determine whether it is safe to receive an injection of your own bone marrow adult stem cells (autologous BM-MNC) to your heart wall during coronary artery bypass graft (CABG).

Study Overview

Detailed Description

The experimental design will be a Phase I safety trial in which all subjects from the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System presenting with CAD and associated depressed LV function requiring myocardial surgical revascularization will be eligible for enrollment. Patients enrolled in the study will receive autologous BM-MNC as adjunct to CABG. The primary outcome measure will be safety as measured by the incidence of postoperative Serious Adverse Events (SAE) and Adverse Events (AE). The secondary outcome measures will be LV function, myocardial perfusion, and clinical improvement. The trial will have one experiment with one patient group. Group 1 (n=15) will follow standard Phase I dose escalation curve on a magnitude of 0.5 log increase after every third patient. Dose escalation will continue until a dosage of 1 x108 cells/pt is reached or maximum tolerated dose equivalent (MTDE) is identified. Cellular therapeutic products such as BM-MNCS do not possess the same pharmacologic profile as small molecule drugs, and thus, do not possess predictable metabolic activity and metabolite production, as do traditional pharmaceuticals. This can make the identity of a maximum tolerated dose somewhat difficult. We are therefore using the term MTDE instead of MTD to indicate a cell dosage that is consistent with clinical morbidity beyond obvious clinical benefit. The characteristics identifying a MTDE could be any adverse event felt to be related to the actual cell dosage or its escalation. Although unlikely, MTDE events could include microembolic phenomena, hematoma at the injection site, obvious myocardial congestion or ischemia at the injection site.

Study Type

Interventional

Phase

  • Phase 1

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Utah
      • Salt Lake City, Utah, United States, 84148
        • VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Veteran
  • Age 18 or older
  • Ability to give informed consent
  • Have documented CAD and depressed LV function (EF <40%) that is felt to be appropriately treated with surgical revascularization by the VA Salt Lake City Health Care System Cardiothoracic Surgery team and in accordance with the published 2004 ACC/AHA Guideline Update for Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery; specifically, in accordance with the described indication for CABG in patients with Poor LV Function (see below).

Class I

  1. CABG should be performed in patients with poor LV function who have significant left main coronary artery stenosis. (Level of Evidence: B)
  2. CABG should be performed in patients with poor LV function who have left main equivalent:

    significant (greater than or equal to 70%) stenosis of the proximal LAD and proximal left circumflex artery. (Level of Evidence: B)

  3. CABG should be performed in patients with poor LV function who have proximal LAD stenosis with 2- or 3-vessel disease. (Level of Evidence: B)

Class IIa

CABG may be performed in patients with poor LV function with significant viable noncontracting, revascularizable myocardium and without any of the above anatomic patterns. (Level of Evidence: B)

  • NHYA/CCA Class I or higher
  • Abnormal cardiac wall segment on preoperative data
  • Acutely stable myocardium without evidence of cardiogenic shock or evolving myocardial infarction

Exclusion Criteria:

  • EF 40%
  • CAD not amenable to CABG
  • ACC/AHA Poor LV Function Class III - CABG should not be performed in patients with poor LV function without evidence of intermittent ischemia and without evidence of significant revascularizable viable myocardium. (Level of Evidence: B) Evidence of intermittent ischemia is defined clinically by Cardiovascular Disease Classification (see chart above). Objectively, this can be demonstrated by various modalities that can demonstrate ischemic myocardium. Such modalities include SCA, Echo, CMRI, and radionucleotide imaging.
  • Patients undergoing cardiac re-operation
  • Patients with operable valvular disease
  • Patients with preexisting malignant arrhythmia
  • Patients with preexisting systemic malignancy
  • Patients with a contraindication to MRI
  • Presence of ongoing local or systemic infection
  • Participation in another clinical trial
  • Emergency operation
  • Preoperative cardiogenic shock or evolving myocardial infarction
  • ASA Class V or contraindication to general anesthesia
  • Pregnancy
  • Prisoner
  • Active history of alcohol or substance abuse
  • Active psychiatric history leading to potential for poor study participation and follow-up

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Arm 1
direct intramyocardial injection of cells as adjunct to CABG

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The primary outcome measure will be safety as measured by the incidence of postoperative serious adverse events (SAE) and adverse events (AE).
Time Frame: 1 year
1 year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Ejection fraction measured by CMRI
Time Frame: at baseline, 3 & 6 months
at baseline, 3 & 6 months
Echo
Time Frame: at baseline, intervention, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year
at baseline, intervention, 2 weeks, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months and 1 year
Myocardial perfusion measured by gadolinium CMRI
Time Frame: at baseline, 3 & 6 months
at baseline, 3 & 6 months
Exercise tolerance testing
Time Frame: at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year
at baseline, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, and 1 year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Collaborators

Investigators

  • Study Chair: G. Russell Reiss, MD, VA Salt Lake City Health Care System, Salt Lake City

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

August 1, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

October 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 17, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

April 20, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

June 11, 2014

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

June 10, 2014

Last Verified

June 1, 2014

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe