- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT00496314
Physician's Comfort Level and Satisfaction Study With The e2TM Collector Compared to the Spatula/CytoBrush Technique
June 13, 2008 updated by: CytoCore, Inc.
Clinical Study Assessing Physician's Comfort Level and Satisfaction When Using The e2TM Cervical Cell Collector Compared to the Standard Spatula/CytoBrush Technique
A study which assesses the physician's comfort level and satisfaction when using the e2TM Collector compared to the Spatula/SytoBrush technique.
Study Overview
Status
Terminated
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Observational
Enrollment (Anticipated)
30
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
Ohio
-
Cleveland, Ohio, United States, 44106
- University Hospital Case Medical Center
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
- Child
- Adult
- Older Adult
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Inclusion Criteria:
- Every Physician who will participate in the two CytoCore prospective studies assessing the safety and efficacy of the e2TM Collector
- Each physician will have used the Collector 15 - 25 times
- Each physician will have signed the Consent form prior to using the Collector for the first time.
Exclusion Criteria:
- None (commensurate with the above inclusion conditions.)
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Time Frame |
|---|---|
|
Physician comfort level and satisfaction when using the e2TM Collector compared to the standard spatula/cytobrush.
Time Frame: Each physician will be surveyed after first and last use of the e2TM collector as well as three more times spaced at near regular intervals in between.
|
Each physician will be surveyed after first and last use of the e2TM collector as well as three more times spaced at near regular intervals in between.
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Collaborators
Investigators
- Principal Investigator: Jay Pinkerton, MD, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Munoz N, Bosch FX, de Sanjose S, Herrero R, Castellsague X, Shah KV, Snijders PJ, Meijer CJ; International Agency for Research on Cancer Multicenter Cervical Cancer Study Group. Epidemiologic classification of human papillomavirus types associated with cervical cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003 Feb 6;348(6):518-27. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa021641.
- Solomon D, Davey D, Kurman R, Moriarty A, O'Connor D, Prey M, Raab S, Sherman M, Wilbur D, Wright T Jr, Young N; Forum Group Members; Bethesda 2001 Workshop. The 2001 Bethesda System: terminology for reporting results of cervical cytology. JAMA. 2002 Apr 24;287(16):2114-9. doi: 10.1001/jama.287.16.2114.
- Sankaranarayanan R, Budukh AM, Rajkumar R. Effective screening programmes for cervical cancer in low- and middle-income developing countries. Bull World Health Organ. 2001;79(10):954-62. Epub 2001 Nov 1.
- Holowaty P, Miller AB, Rohan T, To T. RESPONSE: re: natural history of dysplasia of the uterine cervix. J Natl Cancer Inst. 1999 Aug 18;91(16):1420A-1421. doi: 10.1093/jnci/91.16.1420a. No abstract available.
- Nanda K, McCrory DC, Myers ER, Bastian LA, Hasselblad V, Hickey JD, Matchar DB. Accuracy of the Papanicolaou test in screening for and follow-up of cervical cytologic abnormalities: a systematic review. Ann Intern Med. 2000 May 16;132(10):810-9. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-132-10-200005160-00009.
- Fahey MT, Irwig L, Macaskill P. Meta-analysis of Pap test accuracy. Am J Epidemiol. 1995 Apr 1;141(7):680-9. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a117485.
- Clavel C, Masure M, Bory JP, Putaud I, Mangeonjean C, Lorenzato M, Nazeyrollas P, Gabriel R, Quereux C, Birembaut P. Human papillomavirus testing in primary screening for the detection of high-grade cervical lesions: a study of 7932 women. Br J Cancer. 2001 Jun 15;84(12):1616-23. doi: 10.1054/bjoc.2001.1845.
- Willis BH, Barton P, Pearmain P, Bryan S, Hyde C. Cervical screening programmes: can automation help? Evidence from systematic reviews, an economic analysis and a simulation modelling exercise applied to the UK. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Mar;9(13):1-207, iii. doi: 10.3310/hta9130.
- Buntinx F, Brouwers M. Relation between sampling device and detection of abnormality in cervical smears: a meta-analysis of randomised and quasi-randomised studies. BMJ. 1996 Nov 23;313(7068):1285-90. doi: 10.1136/bmj.313.7068.1285.
- Martin-Hirsch P, Lilford R, Jarvis G, Kitchener HC. Efficacy of cervical-smear collection devices: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet. 1999 Nov 20;354(9192):1763-70. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(99)02353-3. Erratum In: Lancet 2000 Jan 29;355(9201):414.
- Martin-Hirsch P, Jarvis G, Kitchener H, Lilford R. Collection devices for obtaining cervical cytology samples. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2000;(2):CD001036. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001036.
- Selvaggi SM, Guidos BJ. Specimen adequacy and the ThinPrep Pap Test: the endocervical component. Diagn Cytopathol. 2000 Jul;23(1):23-6. doi: 10.1002/1097-0339(200007)23:13.0.CO;2-K.
- Marchand L, Mundt M, Klein G, Agarwal SC. Optimal collection technique and devices for a quality pap smear. WMJ. 2005 Aug;104(6):51-5.
- Koss LG. Evolution in cervical pathology and cytology: a historical perspective. Eur J Gynaecol Oncol. 2000;21(6):550-4. No abstract available.
- Umland B, Waterman R, Wiese W, Duban S, Mennin S, Kaufman A. Learning from a rural physician program in China. Acad Med. 1992 May;67(5):307-9. doi: 10.1097/00001888-199205000-00004. No abstract available.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start
May 1, 2007
Study Completion (Actual)
January 1, 2008
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2007
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
July 2, 2007
First Posted (Estimate)
July 4, 2007
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Estimate)
June 17, 2008
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 13, 2008
Last Verified
June 1, 2008
More Information
Terms related to this study
Other Study ID Numbers
- 12-20-06
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.