Open-label Study of CS-1008 for Subjects With Untreated and Unresectable Pancreatic Cancer

March 11, 2021 updated by: Daiichi Sankyo, Inc.

Phase 2 Multicenter, Open-Label Study of CS-1008, A Humanized Monoclonal Antibody Targeting Death Receptor 5 (DR5), In Combination With Gemcitabine in Chemotherapy Naive Subjects With Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer

Phase 2 study to determine the efficacy and safety of CS-1008 when given with gemcitabine to subjects with previously untreated and unresectable (unable to be surgically removed) or metastatic (spread to other areas beyond the pancreas) pancreatic cancer.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

Primary Objective:

- To evaluate the efficacy of CS-1008 administered in combination with gemcitabine to chemotherapy naive subjects with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer, based on the progression-free survival at 16 weeks.

Secondary Objectives:

  • To evaluate the efficacy of CS-1008 administered in combination with gemcitabine on overall progression-free survival rate, objective response rate, duration of response, and overall survival.
  • To determine the pharmacokinetics of BIP CS-1008 and DSC CS-1008.
  • To study potential biomarkers of CS-1008 activity
  • To assess possible human anti-human antibody formation after exposure to CS-1008
  • To evaluate the safety profile of CS-1008 when administered in combination with gemcitabine to chemotherapy naive subjects with unresectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

65

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Alabama
      • Birmingham, Alabama, United States
    • District of Columbia
      • Washington, District of Columbia, United States
    • Florida
      • Fort Myers, Florida, United States
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States
      • Tucker, Georgia, United States, 30084
        • Georgia Cancer Specialists
    • Illinois
      • Decatur, Illinois, United States
    • Minnesota
      • Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
    • Ohio
      • Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
    • Tennessee
      • Chattanooga, Tennessee, United States
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States
    • Texas
      • Temple, Texas, United States
    • Virginia
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histologically or cytologically confirmed resectable or metastatic pancreatic cancer; not previously treated with chemotherapy; measurable disease; 18 years of age or older

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Anticipation of need for major surgery or radiation therapy during the study
  • Heart Disease exclusions: myocardial infarction or unstable angina within the past 6 months; severe or unstable angina pectoris within the past 6 months; coronary or peripheral artery bypass graft within the past 6 mo., etc.
  • Clinically significant active infection or history of HIV
  • Partial or complete bowel obstruction
  • Poorly controlled psychiatric illness

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: CS-1008 + gemcitabine
CS-1008: 8mg/kg loading dose followed by 3mg/kg weekly.
Other Names:
  • CS1008
Gemcitabine - 1000mg/meter sq
Other Names:
  • Gemzar

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Progression-Free Survival Rate at 16 Weeks Following Treatment With CS-1008 in Combination With Gemcitabine in Chemotherapy-Naïve Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Time Frame: Baseline to the date of disease progression or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first), up to 16 weeks post dose.
Progression-free survival rate (PFS) was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of the study drug (Day 1) to the date of the first objective documentation of disease progression or death resulting from any cause, whichever came first at 16 weeks post-treatment with CS-1008.
Baseline to the date of disease progression or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first), up to 16 weeks post dose.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Kaplan-Meier (Non-Parametric) Analysis of Progression-Free Survival Following Treatment With CS-1008 in Combination With Gemcitabine in Chemotherapy-Naïve Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Time Frame: Baseline up to date of disease progression or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first), up to approximately 36 months post dose.
PFS (Progression-free survival) was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of study drug (Day 1) to the date of the first objective documentation of disease progression or death resulting from any cause, whichever came first.
Baseline up to date of disease progression or death due to any cause (whichever occurs first), up to approximately 36 months post dose.
Overall Survival Following Treatment With CS-1008 in Combination With Gemcitabine in Chemotherapy-Naïve Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Time Frame: Baseline to death due to any cause, up to approximately 36 months post dose.
OS (Overall Survival) was defined as the time from the date of the first administration of study drug (Day 1) to the date of death. If there was no death reported for a subject before the cut-off date for overall survival analysis, overall survival was censored at the last contact date at which the subject was known to be alive.
Baseline to death due to any cause, up to approximately 36 months post dose.
Best Overall Tumor Response Following Treatment With CS-1008 in Combination With Gemcitabine in Chemotherapy-Naïve Participants With Unresectable or Metastatic Pancreatic Cancer
Time Frame: Baseline to up to date of first documented objective response or disease progression (whichever occurs first), up to approximately 36 months post dose.
The best overall response the best response (in the order of confirmed complete response [CR], confirmed partial response [PR], unconfirmed CR, unconfirmed PR, stable disease [SD], and progressive disease[PD]) among all overall responses recorded from the start of treatment until the subject withdrew from the study. If there was no tumor assessment after the first infusion of study drug and no clinical disease progression recorded, the best overall response was classified as Unknown. CR was defined as the disappearance of all target lesions, PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, PD was defined as at least a 20% increase in the sum of diameters of target lesions, and SD was defined as neither sufficient shrinkage to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progressive disease PD according to RECIST guideline (version 1.1).
Baseline to up to date of first documented objective response or disease progression (whichever occurs first), up to approximately 36 months post dose.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Considered by the Investigator at Least Possibly Related to CS-1008 Experienced by ≥5% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose, up to approximately 36 months post dose.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that: emerges during treatment, having been absent at pre-treatment; or reemerges during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment or worsens in severity during treatment relative to the pre-treatment state when the AE was continuous. The AEs with an onset date on Day 1 (the date on which the first dose of study medication was administered) were counted as a TEAE. An AE that occurred more than 30 days after the last dose of study medication was not included as a TEAE unless it was considered drug-related. A TEAE was considered related to CS-1008 or gemcitabine if the investigator considered the event as possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment, or if the investigator's assessment of the relationship was unknown.
Baseline up to 30 days post last dose, up to approximately 36 months post dose.
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events Considered by the Investigator at Least Possibly Related to Gemcitabine Experienced by ≥5% of Participants by System Organ Class and Preferred Term
Time Frame: Baseline up to 30 days post last dose, up to approximately 36 months post dose.
A treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) was defined as an adverse event (AE) that: emerges during treatment, having been absent at pre-treatment; or reemerges during treatment, having been present at baseline but stopped prior to treatment or worsens in severity during treatment relative to the pre-treatment state when the AE was continuous. The AEs with an onset date on Day 1 (the date on which the first dose of study medication was administered) were counted as a TEAE. An AE that occurred more than 30 days after the last dose of study medication was not included as a TEAE unless it was considered drug-related. A TEAE was considered related to CS-1008 or gemcitabine if the investigator considered the event as possibly, probably, or definitely related to treatment, or if the investigator's assessment of the relationship was unknown.
Baseline up to 30 days post last dose, up to approximately 36 months post dose.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

August 15, 2007

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2010

Study Completion (Actual)

August 20, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 24, 2007

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 24, 2007

First Posted (Estimate)

August 27, 2007

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 8, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 11, 2021

Last Verified

March 1, 2021

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe