Telephone Intervention for Pain Study (TIPS) (TIPS)

August 29, 2013 updated by: Dawn Ehde, University of Washington

Efficacy of Telephone-Delivered Cognitive Behavioral Therapy for Chronic Pain

Treatments teaching people how to manage pain have been used to treat chronic pain in the general population. The purpose of this study is to see if these treatments delivered over the telephone can benefit persons with multiple sclerosis, spinal cord injury or an acquired amputation. Specifically, we want to determine if these treatments can help reduce the negative consequences that pain often causes in terms of a person's mood, daily activities, and enjoyment of life. We are also interested in finding out if these treatments decrease a person's pain.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

207

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Washington
      • Seattle, Washington, United States, 98104
        • University of Washington

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Definitive diagnosis of acquired amputation (AMP), multiple sclerosis (MS), or spinal cord injury (SCI) confirmed by participants' primary care physicians
  • Average pain intensity in the past month of greater than 3 on 0-10 numeric rating scale;
  • Pain is either worse or started since the onset of the disability;
  • Pain of at least six months duration, with pain reportedly present greater than or equal to half of the days in the past six months;
  • Read, write and understand English;
  • Must be able to communicate over the phone (i.e., must be verbal);
  • Age 18 years or older.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive impairment defined as one or more errors on the Six-Item screener (Callahan et al., 2002).
  • Current or previous participation in a psychological treatment for pain (obtained via self-report).
  • Current participation in a psychological treatment for any reason on a regular basis(obtained via self-report).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
Intervention 1 will consist of eight 60-minute sessions conducted by phone over eight weeks (1 session/week on average). Intervention 1 will include: (1) education about the role of cognitions (particularly catastrophizing) and pain beliefs (including control) in chronic pain and adjustment; (2) instruction in how to identify negative thinking and cognitive distortions about pain; (3) instruction in thought-stopping and cognitive-restructuring techniques, including challenging negative thoughts and core beliefs about pain; (4) instruction in utilization of positive coping self-statements; (5) relaxation techniques; (6) activity pacing and scheduling; (7) coping with pain flare-ups; and (8) relapse prevention/maintenance of gains. Each intervention 1 session will include a brief relaxation exercise practiced over the phone.
Intervention 1 will consist of eight 60-minute sessions conducted by phone over eight weeks. Intervention 1 will include: (1) education about the role of cognitions (particularly catastrophizing) and pain beliefs (including control) in chronic pain and adjustment; (2) instruction in how to identify negative thinking and cognitive distortions about pain; (3) instruction in thought-stopping and cognitive-restructuring techniques, including challenging negative thoughts and core beliefs about pain; (4) instruction in utilization of positive coping self-statements; (5) relaxation techniques; (6) activity pacing and scheduling; (7) coping with pain flare-ups; and (8) relapse prevention/maintenance of gains. Each intervention 1 session will include a brief relaxation exercise practiced over the phone.
Experimental: 2
Intervention 2 will consist of eight 60-minute sessions conducted by phone over eight weeks (1 session/week on average), scheduled at times convenient for participants (including evenings and weekends if necessary). The sessions will cover a variety of topics, including the definition of chronic pain, the physiological processes underlying chronic pain, common pain-related conditions such as sleep disturbance, and the effects of chronic pain.
Intervention 2 will consist of eight 60-minute sessions conducted by phone over eight weeks (1 session/week on average), scheduled at times convenient for participants (including evenings and weekends if necessary). The sessions will cover a variety of topics, including the definition of chronic pain, the physiological processes underlying chronic pain, common pain-related conditions such as sleep disturbance, and the effects of chronic pain.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Average pain intensity
Time Frame: Four times in a 7-day period Pre-Treatment, Mid-Treatment, Post-Treatment, and Follow-up (6 and 12 months post-randomization).
Four times in a 7-day period Pre-Treatment, Mid-Treatment, Post-Treatment, and Follow-up (6 and 12 months post-randomization).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Physical Functioning-Brief Pain Inventory (Cleeland & Ryan, 1994)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up (6 and 12 months post-randomization).
pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up (6 and 12 months post-randomization).
Patient Health Questionnaire-8 (PHQ-8) (Kroenke & Spitzer, 2002)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up (6 and 12 months post-randomization).
pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and follow-up (6 and 12 months post-randomization).
Pain Catastrophizing Scale (Sullivan et al., 1995)
Time Frame: pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and followup (6 and 12 months post-randomization)
pre-treatment, mid-treatment, post-treatment, and followup (6 and 12 months post-randomization)

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Dawn M. Ehde, Ph.D, University of Washington

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Completion (Actual)

June 1, 2013

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

April 18, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 18, 2008

First Posted (Estimate)

April 22, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 30, 2013

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 29, 2013

Last Verified

August 1, 2013

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe