Hypothermia for Cardiac Arrest in Paediatrics

July 8, 2021 updated by: Jamie Hutchison, The Hospital for Sick Children

Hypothermia for Cardiac Arrest in Paediatrics (HypCAP) - Pilot Study

The investigators hypothesized that, following cardiac arrest in pediatric patients, hypothermia therapy will improve the proportion of patients with a good functional outcome compared to a normothermic control group.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Detailed Description

Cardiac arrest is associated with a high morbidity and mortality in children and hypothermia therapy has the potential to be beneficial in children following cardiac arrest. We have a track record of both clinical and laboratory research of hypothermia therapy following cardiac arrest at the Hospital for Sick Children and have completed a 3-site randomized controlled pilot study of hypothermia therapy following cardiac arrest in children funded by The Hospital for Sick Children Research Institute and the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Ontario. This protocol was used to develop the protocol for the THAPCA trials (see 2 manuscripts published Moler et al NEJM 2015 and 2017 and multiple other manuscripts). Hypothermia therapy, compared to active maintenance of normothermia, had no beneficial effect on functional outcome or mortality in children with out-of-hospital or in-hospital cardiac arrest.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

38

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Ontario
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada
        • The Hospital for Sick Children
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada
        • Sainte-Justine Hospital
      • Auckland, New Zealand
        • Starship Children's Hospital
      • London, United Kingdom
        • Great Ormond Street Hospital

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

1 day to 17 years (CHILD)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Informed consent by parent or legal guardian
  • Age ≥ 38 weeks gestation up to and including 17 years
  • Patient admitted with a diagnosis of a cardiac arrest requiring compressions ≥3 minutes
  • Remain comatose i.e. have Glasgow Coma Score less than or equal to 10 assessed at the tertiary level pediatric hospital at least 1 hour post- cardiac arrest
  • Invasive mechanical ventilation

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cardiac arrest lasting ≥45 minutes, irregardless of commencement of ECMO
  • Refractory hemorrhagic shock
  • Dysrhythmia leading to cardiac arrest, where cooling would be part of standard therapy
  • Suspected diagnosis of brain death as defined as fixed and dilated pupils, Glasgow Coma Score of 3 and no evidence of brain function on neurological examination
  • Patients who have had a prolonged cardiac arrest at the scene of a trauma
  • Decision to withhold (DNR) or withdraw life sustaining therapies
  • Acute Birth asphyxia
  • Terminal illness, not expected to survive 12 months
  • Cardiac arrest caused by septic shock
  • Severe neurodevelopmental disability or persistent vegetative state prior to cardiac arrest
  • Near drowning in ice water and temperature <32ºC on admission to study site
  • It has been more than 6 hours following cardiac arrest (estimated by first responder)
  • Previous enrolment in the HypCAP Pilot Study
  • Pregnant
  • Parent/Guardian refuse consent
  • Responsible physician refuses to enrol patient

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: TREATMENT
  • Allocation: RANDOMIZED
  • Interventional Model: PARALLEL
  • Masking: SINGLE

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
ACTIVE_COMPARATOR: 1
Patients randomized to the Normothermia arm (esophageal temp 36.5-37.5 ºC) were maintained at an esophageal temperature of 36.5-37.5ºC for 48 hours. Patients who were hypothermic (temperature < 35 ºC) when randomized to the normothermia group were rewarmed slowly using the servo-controlled mattress. Patients who were hyperthermic following randomization to the normothermia group were actively cooled to normothermia using the servo-controlled mattress. Neuromuscular blockers were administered as needed intravenously in both groups of patients to prevent shivering.
EXPERIMENTAL: 2
Patients randomized to the Hypothermia arm (esophageal temp 33º to 34 °C) were cooled rapidly using the cooling protocol developed for the Hypothermia Paediatric Head Injury Trial. A temperature probe was placed in the esophagus and its position confirmed using a chest radiograph. Patients were placed on a servo-controlled cooling blanket and covered in crushed ice (in sealed plastic bags covered by pillow cases) and a second cooling blanket. Once the esophageal temperature reached 34.0ºC, the ice and second cooling blanket was removed and esophageal temperature was maintained at 33º to 34 °C for 48 hours using the servo-controlled cooling mattress. Patients treated with ECMO were cooled using the extracorporeal circuit cooling-device. Rewarming was done at a rate of 0.5 ºC every 2 hours until an esophageal temperature of 36.5 ºC was reached. Thereafter temperature was recorded but not controlled by surface cooling.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The percentage of children achieving a "good outcome", that is, a PCPC of 1-3 will be assessed using the Paediatric Cerebral Performance Category scores
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months post cardiac arrest
Assessed at 12 months post cardiac arrest

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Cognitive and motor measures
Time Frame: Assessed at 12 months post-arrest
Assessed at 12 months post-arrest
Mortality
Time Frame: Assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-arrest
Assessed at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months post-arrest
Cerebral edema
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months
Adverse effects of hypothermia therapy
Time Frame: 12 months
12 months

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Jamie Hutchison, MD, The Hospital for Sick Children

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2005

Primary Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2009

Study Completion (ACTUAL)

September 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

September 17, 2008

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

September 17, 2008

First Posted (ESTIMATE)

September 18, 2008

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (ACTUAL)

July 14, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 8, 2021

Last Verified

July 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Keywords

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 1000004888

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe