Comparison of Two Types of Biopsy Forceps for Obtaining Cold Biopsy Polypectomy for Small Sessile Colorectal Polyps Less Than 6 mm in Diameter

July 22, 2015 updated by: University of Florida
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy of the new RJ4 compare with the standard RJ3 biopsy forceps for performing polypectomy for small colorectal polyps.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

125

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Florida
      • Gainesville, Florida, United States, 32610
        • Shands Endocopy Center

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • colon polyps less than 6 mm

Exclusion Criteria:

  • no colon polyps

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Diagnostic
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: RJ3 Biopsy Forcep
use of RJ3 Biopsy forcep for the polypectomy
Use of either the RJ3 or RJ4 biopsy forcep for colon polypectomy. will evaluate the effectiveness of removal of polyps less than 6 mm.
Active Comparator: RJ4 Biopsey Forcep
Use of RJ$ biopsy forcep for polypectomy
Use of either the RJ3 or RJ4 biopsy forcep for colon polypectomy. will evaluate the effectiveness of removal of polyps less than 6 mm.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Complete endoscopic (visual) eradication of the polyp with the first forceps bite
Time Frame: one year
one year

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Number of bites to completely visually eradicate the polyp if the polyp was not fully eradicated with the first forceps bite
Time Frame: one year
one year
Complete pathologic eradication of the polyp on the first forceps bite.
Time Frame: one year
one year
Correlate endoscopic with pathologic eradication
Time Frame: one year
one year

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

December 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

November 1, 2009

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 2, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 3, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 4, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2015

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2015

Last Verified

July 1, 2015

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Colorectal Polyps

Clinical Trials on evaluate the effectiveness of the RJ4 biopsy forcep versus the RJ3 biopsy forcep

Subscribe