MOA Study of Ze 339 in Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis (PETRA)

January 25, 2012 updated by: Max Zeller Soehne AG

Randomized, Double-blind Prospective Clinical Study to Examine the Mechanism of Action of IG-RD-001 (Ze-339) Compared to Desloratadine and Placebo in Patients With Seasonal Allergic Rhinitis Who Are Sensitized to Grasses

Randomised, double-blind and prospective clinical study to examine the mechanism of action of the Petasites hybridus leaf extract IG-RD-001 (Ze-339, petasol butenoate complex) compared to desloratadine and placebo in patients with seasonal allergic rhinitis of all degrees of severity (provoked by grasses). The treatment arm with desloratadine is an established standard treatment and is intended to ensure the comparative methodology of the study.

Study Overview

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

18

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Dusseldorf, Germany
        • Dept. of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Allergic rhinitis since at least 2 years
  • Age: = > 18 years
  • Consent in accordance with the AMG (=German Drug Law)
  • Positive skin test, skin prick test or positive RAST for grasses The skin prick test is positive if the wheal is >= 3 mm greater than control; a skin test is positive if the wheal is >= 7 mm greater than control
  • Women of childbearing potential have to use a highly effective method of birth control (according CPMP/ICH/286/95 Note 3) during the duration of the study. A highly effective method of birth control is defined as those which result in a low failure rate (i.e. less than 1% per year) when used consistently and correctly such as implants, injectables, combined oral contraceptives, some IUDs, sexual abstinence or vasectomised partner.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Past or current psychological disease or disorder which can impair the study participant's ability to understand the study requirements, t take part in the study or give consent after briefing
  • Past or current alcohol or medication dependency or abuse
  • Bronchial asthma (FEV < 80 %)
  • Glaucoma, cataract or ocular herpes simplex
  • Clinically relevant deviations from normal laboratory parameters (if known)
  • Antihistamines with a long-term effect
  • Malignant diseases, including in the patient's case history
  • Parasites
  • Study participants who are taking part in another study or took an investigational product during the last 4 weeks before the start of treatment
  • Progressive systemic diseases such as tuberculosis, leukoses, collagenoses, multiple sclerosis, Aids, HIV infection and other autoimmune diseases
  • Other types of rhinitis with different causes, acute or chronic sinusitis
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Serious internal diseases, e.g. serious decompensated diseases of the heart, liver, kidneys or diabetes mellitus
  • Patients with rarely occurring hereditary problems galactose-intolerance, Lapp-lactase-deficiency or glucose-galactose-malabsorption
  • Pre-existing liver damage
  • The use of non-steroidal antirheumatic agents (NSAR)
  • Hypersensitivity towards one of the ingredients in the investigational product
  • Not adhering to the following periods of abstention before the nasal provocation test: 3 days for DNCG, nedocromil, nasal and oral antihistamines, and tricyclic psychotropic drugs, 1 months systemic treatment with glucocorticoids, 14 days for nasal and topical corticosteroids, 1 week for antihistamines, and 1 day for α-adrenergic drugs. The use of ACE inhibitors or ß-blockers
  • Previous organ transplants

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Crossover Assignment
  • Masking: Double

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: 2
Following a 3-way crossover treatment design (IG-RD-001 (Ze 339), desloratadine, placebo), a controlled, unilateral, nasal allergen provocation (grasses) will be carried out on 18 study participants. The time-dependent development of the nasal obstruction, measured via rhinomanometry before and after the allergen provocation, will be the effect parameter.
Placebo Comparator: 1
Following a 3-way crossover treatment design (IG-RD-001 (Ze 339), desloratadine, placebo), a controlled, unilateral, nasal allergen provocation (grasses) will be carried out on 18 study participants. The time-dependent development of the nasal obstruction, measured via rhinomanometry before and after the allergen provocation, will be the effect parameter.
Experimental: 3
Following a 3-way crossover treatment design (IG-RD-001 (Ze 339), desloratadine, placebo), a controlled, unilateral, nasal allergen provocation (grasses) will be carried out on 18 study participants. The time-dependent development of the nasal obstruction, measured via rhinomanometry before and after the allergen provocation, will be the effect parameter.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
The time-dependent development of the nasal obstruction, measured via rhinomanometry before and after the allergen provocation, will be the effect parameter.
Time Frame: 0-24 hours post nasal provocation test
0-24 hours post nasal provocation test

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Time Frame
Clinical symptom score (rhinorrhoea, nasal congestion, nasal itching and sneezing), assessment by the investigator (nasal secretion, irritation, occurrence of systemic symptoms), mediators in the serum, nasal secretion, nasal curettage and biopsy
Time Frame: 0-24h post nasal provocation test
0-24h post nasal provocation test

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2008

Study Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

March 13, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

March 13, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

March 16, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

January 26, 2012

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 25, 2012

Last Verified

January 1, 2012

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe