Study of Safety And Efficacy Of ReFacto AF In Previously Untreated Hemophilia A Patients In The Usual Care Setting

May 10, 2019 updated by: Pfizer

AN OPEN-LABEL STUDY OF THE SAFETY AND EFFICACY OF REFACTO AF IN PREVIOUSLY UNTREATED PATIENTS IN USUAL CARE SETTINGS

Study to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of ReFacto AF for the treatment of severe hemophilia A in patients who have not yet received treatment for their hemophilia. Study subjects will be males less than 6 years old who have not taken any clotting factor or other blood products before the study. The safety and effectiveness of ReFacto AF will be determined in this study by tests and procedures done at the doctor's office.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Detailed Description

Regulatory Commitment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

23

Phase

  • Phase 4

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Nantes, France, 44093
        • CHU de Nantes
      • Bremen, Germany, 28177
        • Klinikum Bremen-Mitte gGmbH, Professor Hess Kinderklinik
    • Niedersachsen
      • Hannover, Niedersachsen, Germany, 30625
        • Medizinische Hochschule, Hannover
      • Firenze, Italy, 50134
        • Agenzia per L'emofilia e Centro Regionale Riferimento Coagulopatie Congenite
      • Groningen, Netherlands, 9713 GZ
        • University Medical Center Groningen
      • Madrid, Spain, 28046
        • Hospital Universitario La Paz
      • Valencia, Spain, 46009
        • Hospital Universitario La Fe
      • Adana, Turkey, 01330
        • Cukurova Universitesi Tip Fakultesi
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34098
        • Istanbul Universitesi Cerrahpasa Tip Fakultesi
    • Izmir
      • Bornova, Izmir, Turkey, 35100
        • Ege Universitesi Tip Fakultesi
      • Lviv, Ukraine, 79044
        • Derzhavna ustanova "Instytut patolohii krovi ta transfuziinoi medytsyny Natsionalnoi akademii

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

No older than 6 years (Child)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male subjects <6 years of age with severe hemophilia A (FVIII:C <1%) based on clinical records, including newborns.
  • No prior exposure to factor products or any blood products.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of any bleeding disorder in addition to hemophilia A.
  • Treatment with any investigational agent or device within the past 30 days.
  • Any condition(s) that compromises the ability to collect study-related observations, or that poses a contraindication to study participation (these conditions include, but are not limited to, inadequate medical history to assure study eligibility; and expectation of poor adherence to study requirements).

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Other
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: 1
The investigator treats subjects with ReFacto AF in the usual care setting.
Blood draws to determine the level of factor VIII activity before and after dosing at appropriate visits, and blood draws to determine levels of factor VIII inhibitor (antibody to factor VIII).
Other Names:
  • ReFacto AF

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants Who Developed Clinically Significant Factor VIII (FVIII) Inhibitors During the Course of the Study
Time Frame: 2 years
Percentage of participants who developed clinically significant FVIII inhibitors: those persistent over a defined period with clinically impactful effects like breakthrough bleed, low recovery, etc., during the course of the study.
2 years

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Annualized Bleeding Rate (ABR)
Time Frame: 2 years
Annualized bleeding rate was calculated as the number of bleeds divided by the treatment interval duration (enrollment visit to final visit) and then multiplied by 365.25. If there was more than 1 bleed location (like ankle and joint) with identical bleed start date and time, it was treated as 1 bleed occurrence.
2 years
Total Number of Infusions to Treat a New Bleed Classified on Basis of Response to First On-Demand Treatment With Refacto AF
Time Frame: 2 years
Number of infusions of Refacto AF required to treat a new bleed were classified on basis of the response to at 4-point response scale of assessment (excellent, good, moderate and no response). Assessment was completed each time a participant experienced a new bleed requiring an 'on-demand' IV infusion. Excellent: definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding signs within 8 hours (hr) after infusion, no additional infusion administered; Good: definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding signs within 8 hr after infusion, at least 1 additional infusion administered for complete resolution or with no additional infusion administered; Moderate: probable or slight improvement starting after 8 hr following infusion, at least 1 additional infusion administered for complete resolution; No Response: no improvement at all between infusions or during 24 hr interval following infusion or condition worsen. Bleeds for which response not recorded, reported as: Data Not Recorded.
2 years
Total Number of Infusions Needed for Resolution of Bleeding Episodes Classified on Basis of Response to Study Drug Infusion
Time Frame: Within 48 hours after infusion, up to 2 years treatment duration
Number of infusions of Refacto AF required for resolution of a bleeding episodes were classified on basis of the response at 4-point response scale of assessment (excellent, good, moderate and no response). Excellent: definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding signs within 8 hours (hr) after infusion, no additional infusion administered; Good: definite pain relief and/or improvement in bleeding signs within 8 hr after infusion, at least 1 additional infusion administered for complete resolution or with no additional infusion administered; Moderate: probable or slight improvement starting after 8 hr following infusion, at least 1 additional infusion administered for complete resolution; No Response: no improvement at all between infusions or during 24 hr interval following infusion or condition worsen. Bleeds for which response not recorded, reported as: Data Not Recorded.
Within 48 hours after infusion, up to 2 years treatment duration
Total Number of Breakthrough Bleeding Episodes Occurring Within 48 Hours After a Prophylaxis Infusion of ReFacto AF
Time Frame: 2 years
The number of breakthrough bleeds (spontaneous or traumatic) within 48 hours following a prophylaxis dose of ReFacto AF are summarized. If there was more than 1 bleed location (like ankle and joint) with identical bleed start date and time, it was treated as 1 bleed occurrence.
2 years
Consumption of Total International Units of Factor VIII
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Consumption of Total International Units of Factor VIII Per Year
Time Frame: 2 years
Consumption of total international units of Factor VIII per year was calculated for a participant: dividing the total consumption of factor VIII by participant's treatment interval duration (in days), then multiplying by 365.25.
2 years
Mean Dose (IU) of Study Drug Consumed Per Infusion
Time Frame: 2 years
Mean dose for each participant was calculated as participant's total factor VIII consumption (in IU) divided by the number of infusions administered.
2 years
Consumption of Total International Units of Factor VIII by Weight
Time Frame: 2 years
Consumption of total international units of Factor VIII by weight was calculated for a participant: dividing the total consumption of factor VIII by participant's weight (the most recently recorded).
2 years
Consumption of Total International Units of Factor VIII Per Year by Weight
Time Frame: 2 years
Consumption of total international units of Factor VIII per year by weight was calculated for a participant: the total consumption of factor VIII divided by participant's treatment interval duration (in days), then multiplying by 365.25 and then dividing by participant's weight (the most recently recorded).
2 years
Mean Dose (IU) of Study Drug Consumed Per Infusion by Weight
Time Frame: 2 years
Mean dose for each participant was calculated as participant's total factor consumption (in IU) divided by the number of infusions administered and then dividing by participant's weight (the most recently recorded).
2 years
Mean of Total Number of Infusions of Study Drug Received
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Mean of Total Number of Days Participants Exposed to Study Drug
Time Frame: 2 years
2 years
Number of Participants Who Required Dose Escalation of Their Prescribed Prophylaxis Regimen During Their Participation in This Study
Time Frame: 2 years
The number of participants who met the dose escalation criteria were prescribed a higher dose and/or were prescribed more frequent doses. When dose escalation was required, the specific dose and dosing schedule was at the investigator's discretion.
2 years
Percentage of Bleeding Episodes With Less-Than-Expected Therapeutic Effect (LETE) in On-Demand (OD) Setting
Time Frame: 2 years
LETE occurs in OD setting if participant recorded 2 successive "No Response" (no improvement at all between infusions, or condition worsens) ratings after 2 successive infusions of study drug. Infusions must have been given within 24 hours (hr) of each other for treatment of same bleeding event in absence of confounding factors (known presence or subsequent identification of a FVIII inhibitor, known inadequate dose for type and/or severity of bleed in opinion of investigator, delay of greater than (>) 4 hr between onset of bleed to infusion, delay of >24 hr before administration of a follow-up infusion, known compromised study drug, faulty administration of study drug, participant had an underlying, predisposing condition responsible for bleed in opinion of investigator, ongoing trauma responsible for continued bleeding.
2 years
Percentage of Bleeding Episodes With Less-Than-Expected Therapeutic Effect (LETE) in the Prophylaxis Setting
Time Frame: 2 years
LETE in prophylaxis setting if there was a spontaneous bleed within 48 hours after a regularly scheduled prophylactic dose of study drug (which was not used to treat a bleed) in the absence of confounding factors (known presence or subsequent identification of a FVIII inhibitor, known inadequate prophylactic dose [a dose less than that prescribed in participant's regimen], known lack of adherence to the prescribed prophylaxis regimen, known compromised study drug, faulty administration of study drug, participant had an underlying, predisposing condition responsible for the bleed in the opinion of the investigator, traumatic injury responsible for bleeding.
2 years
Total Number of Events of Potential Less-Than-Expected Therapeutic Effect (LETE) in the Low Recovery Setting
Time Frame: 2 years
LETE was lower than expected recovery of FVIII in the opinion of the investigator following infusion of study drug in the absence of confounding factors (known presence or subsequent identification of a FVIII inhibitor, known compromised study drug, faulty administration of study drug including inadequate dosing).
2 years

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

February 10, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

November 24, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 29, 2009

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 30, 2009

First Posted (Estimate)

July 31, 2009

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

July 19, 2019

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 10, 2019

Last Verified

May 1, 2019

More Information

Terms related to this study

Other Study ID Numbers

  • 3082B2-4434
  • B1831006 (Other Identifier: Alias Study Number)
  • 2008-008436-93 (EudraCT Number)

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

YES

IPD Plan Description

Pfizer will provide access to individual de-identified participant data and related study documents (e.g. protocol, Statistical Analysis Plan (SAP), Clinical Study Report (CSR)) upon request from qualified researchers, and subject to certain criteria, conditions, and exceptions. Further details on Pfizer's data sharing criteria and process for requesting access can be found at: https://www.pfizer.com/science/clinical_trials/trial_data_and_results/data_requests.

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Subscribe