Safety and Efficacy Extension Study of Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) (BIIB019) in Participants Who Have Completed Study 205MS202 (NCT00870740) to Treat Relapsing Remitting Multiple Sclerosis (SELECTED)

April 11, 2018 updated by: Biogen

A Multicenter, Open-label, Extension Study to Evaluate the Long Term Safety and Efficacy of Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) Monotherapy in Subjects With Multiple Sclerosis Who Have Completed Treatment in Study 205MS202 (SELECTION)

Primary Objective is to assess the safety of extended treatment with Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP, BIIB019) monotherapy in participants with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Secondary Objective is to assess the long-term immunogenicity of DAC HYP and to assess the durability of response to DAC HYP in preventing multiple sclerosis (MS) relapse, slowing disability progression, and reducing new MS lesion formation in this study population.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This study will provide participants who complete Study 205MS202 (NCT00870740) with the option to receive continued open-label Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) monotherapy and to evaluate the long-term safety, efficacy, and immunogenicity of DAC HYP monotherapy in participants with relapsing remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS). Approximately 60 to 100 participants will be enrolled into an optional open-label, 16-week autoinjector substudy at a selected subset of sites which will run concurrently during the main study, and will evaluate the systemic exposure and local tolerability of subcutaneous administration of DAC HYP by autoinjector. The 2013-2014 trivalent influenza vaccine will be offered to all eligible participants as an optional substudy to assess the effect of DAC-HYP treatment on the immune response to vaccination,

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

410

Phase

  • Phase 2

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Brno, Czechia, 625 00
        • Research Site
      • Brno, Czechia, 656 91
        • Research Site
      • Hradec Kralove, Czechia, 500 02
        • Research Site
      • Prague, Czechia, 100 34
        • Research Site
      • Teplice, Czechia, 415 29
        • Research Site
      • Bayreuth, Germany, 95445
        • Research Site
      • Erlangen, Germany, 91054
        • Research Site
      • Marburg, Germany, 35043
        • Research Site
      • Rostock, Germany, 18147
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1083
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1115
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1125
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1076
        • Research Site
      • Budapest, Hungary, 1134
        • Research Site
      • Debrecen, Hungary, 4032
        • Research Site
      • Esztergom, Hungary, 2500
        • Research Site
      • Gyor, Hungary, 9024
        • Research Site
      • Kecskemet, Hungary, 6000
        • Research Site
      • Miskolc, Hungary, 3526
        • Research Site
      • Miskolc, Hungary, 3533
        • Research Site
      • Nyiregyhaza, Hungary, 4400
        • Research Site
      • Siofok, Hungary, 8600
        • Research Site
      • Bangalore, India, 560034
        • Research Site
      • Hyderabad, India, 500082
        • Research Site
      • Kolkata, India, 700068
        • Research Site
      • Mumbai, India, 400012
        • Research Site
      • Rajasthan, India, 302021
        • Research Site
      • Bialystok, Poland, 15-276
        • Research Site
      • Bialystok, Poland, 15-420
        • Research Site
      • Gdansk, Poland, 80-803
        • Research Site
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-749
        • Research Site
      • Katowice, Poland, 40-752
        • Research Site
      • Krakow, Poland, 31-505
        • Research Site
      • Lodz, Poland, 93-121
        • Research Site
      • Lublin, Poland, 20954
        • Research Site
      • Warsaw, Poland, 02-957
        • Research Site
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-097
        • Research Site
      • Kazan, Russian Federation, 420021
        • Research Site
      • Krasnoyarsk, Russian Federation, 660049
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 107150
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 115682
        • Research Site
      • Moscow, Russian Federation, 6127018
        • Research Site
      • Nizhniy Novgorod, Russian Federation, 603076
        • Research Site
      • Novosibirsk, Russian Federation, 630087
        • Research Site
      • Omsk, Russian Federation, 644033
        • Research Site
      • Samara, Russian Federation, 443095
        • Research Site
      • Smolensk, Russian Federation, 214018
        • Research Site
      • St Petersburg, Russian Federation, 194291
        • Research Site
      • Ufa, Russian Federation, 450005
        • Research Site
      • Yaroskavi, Russian Federation, 150030
        • Research Site
      • Chernivtsi, Ukraine, 58018
        • Research Site
      • Dnipropetrovsk, Ukraine, 49027
        • Research Site
      • Donetsk, Ukraine, 83003
        • Research Site
      • Kharkiv, Ukraine, 61068
        • Research Site
      • Kiev, Ukraine, 03110
        • Research Site
      • Kiev, Ukraine, 2125
        • Research Site
      • Kyiv, Ukraine, 03110
        • Research Site
      • Poltava, Ukraine, 36024
        • Research Site
      • Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69035
        • Research Site
      • Zaporizhia, Ukraine, 69600
        • Research Site
      • London, United Kingdom, SE59RF
        • Research Site
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG72UH
        • Research Site
      • Plymouth, United Kingdom, PL68DH
        • Research Site
      • Sheffield, United Kingdom, S102JF
        • Research Site
      • Stoke-on-Trent, United Kingdom, ST47LN
        • Research Site

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years to 60 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Main Study Eligibility:

Key Inclusion Criteria:

  • Ability to understand the purpose and risks of the study and provide signed and dated informed consent and authorization to use protected health information (PHI) in accordance with national and local subject privacy regulations.
  • Subjects who have completed 52 weeks in Study 205MS202 (NCT00870740) and were compliant with the 205MS202 protocol in the opinion of the Investigator.
  • Women of childbearing potential must practice effective contraception during the study and be willing and able to continue contraception for 4 months after their last dose of study treatment.

Key Exclusion Criteria:

  • Subjects with any significant change in their medical status from the previous study that would prelude administration of Daclizumab High Yield Process (DAC HYP) as determined by the Investigator including laboratory tests or a current clinically significant condition that, in the opinion of the Investigator, would have excluded the subject's participation in the 205MS201 (NCT00390221) or 205MS202 (NCT00870740) studies. The Investigator must re-review the subject's medical fitness for participation and must consider any diseases that would preclude treatment.
  • Any subject who has permanently discontinued study treatment in Study 205MS202 (NCT00870740) due to an adverse event.
  • Current enrollment in any investigational drug study other than Study 205MS202 (NCT00870740).
  • Ongoing treatment with any approved or experimental disease-modifying treatment for multiple sclerosis.
  • For subjects currently taking valproic acid, carbamazepine, lamotrigine, or phenytoin:

    • Subjects treated with any of these agents for fewer than 6 months prior to study entry are excluded from study participation unless they discontinue the agent(s) prior to study entry.
    • Subjects treated with 2 or more of these agents for more than 6 months prior to study entry are excluded from study participation unless they reduce to ≤1 agent prior to study entry.
    • Subjects who have had dose escalations of one of these agents within the 6 months prior to study entry are excluded from study participation unless they revert to a previous dose that had been used for at least 6 months prior to study entry or unless they discontinue the agent prior to study entry
  • Subjects who are currently receiving treatment with isoniazid, propylthiouracil, or nimesulide at the time of study entry and are not able to discontinue the agent or change to an alternative medication allowed by the protocol.

NOTE: Other protocol defined Inclusion/Exclusion criteria may apply.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: N/A
  • Interventional Model: Single Group Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: BIIB019
Participants received BIIB019, 150 mg subcutaneous injection every 4 weeks up to Week 288.
Administered as specified in the treatment arm.
Other Names:
  • Daclizumab High Yield Process
  • DAC HYP
All participants who participate in the 2013-2014 influenza vaccine substudy will receive the vaccine at the study site

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs), Serious Adverse Events (SAEs), Discontinuation Due to AEs, Withdrawals Due to AEs
Time Frame: Baseline up to 24 weeks after last dose of treatment (Up to 300 weeks)
An AE is defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical investigation participant administered a drug; it does not necessarily have to have a causal relationship with this treatment. A SAE is any untoward medical occurrence or effect that at any dose results in death, is life-threatening, requires inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in persistent or significant disability / incapacity, is a congenital anomaly / birth defect or is medically important due to other reasons than the above mentioned criteria.
Baseline up to 24 weeks after last dose of treatment (Up to 300 weeks)
Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve Over the Dosing Interval (AUC0-t) After Dose 4 for Daclizumab
Time Frame: Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants With New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
New or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions evaluated by magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and analyzed by a central reader.
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Annual Change in Volume of New or Newly Enlarging T2 Hyperintense Lesions Compared to Baseline
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
New or newly enlarging T2 hyperintense lesions evaluated by MRI and analyzed by a central reader.
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Number of Participants With Total Number of New Gadolinium-enhancing Lesions
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
New Gadolinium-enhancing lesions was evaluated by MRI and analyzed by a central reader.
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Annual Change in Number of T1 Hypointense Lesions
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Annual Change in Volume of New Gadolinium-Enhancing Lesions
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Annual Change in Volume of T1 Hypointense Lesions
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
Volume of T1 hypointense lesions was evaluated by MRI and analyzed by a central reader.
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Percent Change in Total Brain Volume
Time Frame: From Baseline through 288 weeks
To assess brain atrophy, total brain volume was be measured by MRI and analyzed by a central reader.
From Baseline through 288 weeks
Number of Participants With Antibodies to DAC HYP
Time Frame: Up to Week 288
Up to Week 288
Annualized Relapse Rate (ARR)
Time Frame: Week 288
Relapses are defined as new or recurrent neurologic symptoms not associated with fever or infection, lasting at least 24 hours, and accompanied by new objective neurological findings upon examination by the Examining Neurologist. The ARR was calculated by tabulating the total number of relapses experienced in the group divided by the number of days up to the end of study, and the ratio then multiplied by 365. Adjusted ARR was reported.
Week 288
Number of Participants With Sustained Disability Progression for 12 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 48 up to Week 288
Sustained disability progression defined by at least a 1.0-point increase on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from a baseline EDSS ≥1.0 that is sustained for 12 weeks, or at least a 1.5-point increase on the EDSS from a baseline EDSS <1.0 that is sustained for 12 weeks. The EDSS measures the disability status of people with multiple sclerosis on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability.
Week 48 up to Week 288
Number of Participants With Sustained Disability Progression for 24 Weeks
Time Frame: Week 48 up to Week 288
Sustained disability progression defined by at least a 1.0-point increase on the Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) from a baseline EDSS ≥1.0 that is sustained for 24 weeks, or at least a 1.5-point increase on the EDSS from a baseline EDSS <1.0 that is sustained for 24 weeks. The EDSS measures the disability status of people with multiple sclerosis on a scale that ranges from 0 to 10, with higher scores indicating more disability.
Week 48 up to Week 288
Observed Maximum Concentration (Cmax) After Dose 4 for Daclizumab
Time Frame: Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Time to Reach Maximum Concentration (Tmax) for Daclizumab After Dose 4
Time Frame: Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Observed Minimum Concentration (Cmin) for Daclizumab After Dose 4
Time Frame: Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Day 90 (Week 12) at predose and 8, 24, 72 and 120 hours post-dose and 7, 10, 14, 21 and 28 days post-dose
Participant-Reported Pain Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Score
Time Frame: First injection (Day 1) and fourth injection (Day 90) 0 hour, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 8 hours post-dose
The VAS is a 10 cm-long horizontal line labeled with 2 extremes of pain at either end ("0 [no pain]" on the left and "100 [very painful]" on the right). The participant rates their perceived pain of each injection by placing a vertical mark on the line to indicate the level of pain.
First injection (Day 1) and fourth injection (Day 90) 0 hour, 30 minutes, 60 minutes and 8 hours post-dose
Summary of Injection Site Assessment Performed by Clinician
Time Frame: First injection (Day 1) and fourth injection (Day 90) 30 minutes; 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours; and 7, 10, and 14 days post-dose

Injection site assessment was performed by clinician and are defined as erythema (redness) rated on a 4 point scale ranging from 0-3, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe; pigmentation changes (skin discoloration other than redness) rated on a 3 point scale from 0-2, where 0=none, 1=hypopigmentation and 2=hyperpigmentation; induration (swelling) rated on a 4 point scale ranging from 0-3, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe; tenderness to pressure rated on a 4 point scale ranging from 0-3, where 0=none, 1=mild, 2=moderate and 3=severe; and local temperature changes of injection sites rated on a 3 point scale where 0=normal, 1=warm and 1=hot. Only those score categories for which there was at least 1 participant are reported.

Here, Injection=Inj, post-dose=PD

First injection (Day 1) and fourth injection (Day 90) 30 minutes; 8, 24, 72, and 120 hours; and 7, 10, and 14 days post-dose

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Collaborators

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

March 31, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2016

Study Completion (Actual)

August 25, 2016

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

January 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

January 15, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

January 18, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

November 9, 2018

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 11, 2018

Last Verified

April 1, 2018

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Relapsing-Remitting Multiple Sclerosis

Clinical Trials on BIIB019 (Daclizumab)

Subscribe