- ICH GCP
- US Clinical Trials Registry
- Clinical Trial NCT01136733
A Study of E7080 Alone, and in Combination With Everolimus in Subjects With Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Following One Prior Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF)-Targeted Treatment
February 7, 2019 updated by: Eisai Inc.
An Open-Label, Multicenter, Phase 1b/2 Study of E7080 Alone, and in Combination With Everolimus in Subjects With Unresectable Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Following One Prior VEGF-Targeted Treatment
This is an open-label, multicenter, Phase 1b/2 study of lenvatinib alone and in combination with everolimus in subjects with unresectable advanced or metastatic renal cell carcinoma following one prior VEGF-targeted treatment.
Study Overview
Status
Completed
Conditions
Intervention / Treatment
Study Type
Interventional
Enrollment (Actual)
173
Phase
- Phase 2
- Phase 1
Contacts and Locations
This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.
Study Locations
-
-
-
Brno, Czechia
-
Olomouc, Czechia
-
Prague, Czechia
-
-
-
-
-
Gdansk, Poland
-
Lodz, Poland
-
Szczecin, Poland
-
Warsaw, Poland
-
-
-
-
-
Barcelona, Spain
-
Cordoba, Spain
-
Madrid, Spain
-
Pamplona, Spain
-
-
-
-
-
Bristol, United Kingdom
-
Cambridge, United Kingdom
-
Cardiff, United Kingdom
-
Glasgow, United Kingdom
-
Guildford, United Kingdom
-
Ipswich, United Kingdom
-
Leicester, United Kingdom
-
London, United Kingdom
-
Manchester, United Kingdom
-
Southampton, United Kingdom
-
Surrey, United Kingdom
-
Wirral, United Kingdom
-
-
-
-
Arizona
-
Tucson, Arizona, United States
-
-
California
-
Orange, California, United States
-
San Diego, California, United States
-
-
Florida
-
Tampa, Florida, United States
-
-
Illinois
-
Joliet, Illinois, United States
-
-
Kentucky
-
Louisville, Kentucky, United States
-
-
Maryland
-
Annapolis, Maryland, United States
-
Bethesda, Maryland, United States
-
-
Massachusetts
-
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
-
-
Mississippi
-
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
-
-
New York
-
New York, New York, United States
-
-
Oklahoma
-
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
-
-
South Carolina
-
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
-
-
Texas
-
Dallas, Texas, United States
-
-
Participation Criteria
Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.
Eligibility Criteria
Ages Eligible for Study
18 years to 99 years (Adult, Older Adult)
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Genders Eligible for Study
All
Description
Select Inclusion Criteria:
- Histologically confirmed diagnosis of renal cell carcinoma.
- Phase 2: Histological or cytological confirmation of predominant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (original tissue diagnosis of RCC is acceptable).
- Documented evidence of unresectable advanced or metastatic RCC. Phase 2: Radiographic evidence of disease progression according to modified Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1).
- Phase 2: One prior vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment (for example, but not limited to, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, bevacizumab, axitinib, vatalanib, AV951/tivozanib) for unresectable advanced or metastatic RCC.
- Phase 2: Measurable disease meeting the following criteria: a.) at least 1 lesion of greater than or equal to 1.5 cm in the longest diameter for a non-lymph node or greater than or equal to 1.5 cm in the short axis diameter for a lymph node which is serially measurable according to Modified RECIST 1.1 using computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI) or photography. Subjects must have an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0 or 1.
- Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as BP less than or equal to 150/90 mmHg at screening and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week prior to the Screening Visit.
Select Exclusion Criteria:
Phase 1b or Phase 2 specific per below:
- Phase 1b only: Subjects with untreated or unstable metastasis to the central nervous system (CNS) are excluded. Subjects who have completed local therapy and have discontinued the use of steroids for this indication at least 4 weeks prior to commencing treatment and in whom stability has been proven by at least 2 CT or MRI scans obtained at least 4 weeks apart are eligible for Phase 1b only. Phase 2 only: Subjects with CNS (e.g., brain or leptomeningeal) metastasis are excluded.
- Phase 2 only: More than one prior VEGF-targeted treatment for unresectable advanced or metastatic RCC.
Phase 1b or Phase 2 specific per below:
- Phase 1b only: Prior exposure to lenvatinib. Phase 2 only: Prior exposure to lenvatinib or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor.
- Subjects should not have received any anticancer treatment within 21 days or any investigational agent within 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug and should have recovered from any toxicity related to previous anticancer treatment. Major surgery within 3 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug.
- Subjects having greater than 1+ proteinuria on urinalysis will undergo 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria.
- Subjects with urine protein greater than or equal to 1 g/24 hours will be ineligible. Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting serum glucose at 1.5 x ULN.
- Phase 2 only: Active malignancy (except for renal cell carcinoma, melanoma in-situ, basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix) within the past 24 months.
- Known intolerance to any of the study drugs (or any of the excipients) and/or known hypersensitivity to rapamycins (e.g., sirolimus, everolimus, temsirolimus) or any of the excipients.
- Phase 1b only: Subjects who discontinued prior tyrosine kinase inhibitor due to toxicity will be ineligible.
Study Plan
This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.
How is the study designed?
Design Details
- Primary Purpose: Treatment
- Allocation: Randomized
- Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
- Masking: None (Open Label)
Arms and Interventions
Participant Group / Arm |
Intervention / Treatment |
|---|---|
|
Experimental: Lenvatinib
|
taken orally, once a day
Other Names:
|
|
Experimental: Lenvatinib plus Everolimus
|
taken orally, once a day
Other Names:
taken orally, once a day
Other Names:
|
|
Active Comparator: Everolimus
|
taken orally, once a day
Other Names:
|
What is the study measuring?
Primary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 1b: Number of Participants With Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT)
Time Frame: First dose of study drug (Cycle 1 Day 1) to end of first 4 weeks of therapy (Cycle 1)
|
A DLT was defined as either a treatment-related failure to administer greater than or equal to (>=) 75% of the planned dosage of lenvatinib/everolimus or a specific National Cancer Institute Common Toxicity Criteria (NCI CTC) >= Grade 3 (severe or medically significant but not immediately life-threatening; hospitalization or prolongation of hospitalization indicated; disabling; limiting self-care daily living activities) hematologic or nonhematologic toxicities considered to be possibly related to lenvatinib and/or everolimus therapy assessed during the first treatment cycle of each dose level.
Higher grade indicates more severe toxicity.
|
First dose of study drug (Cycle 1 Day 1) to end of first 4 weeks of therapy (Cycle 1)
|
|
Phase 1b: Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and Recommended Phase 2 (RP2) Dose
Time Frame: First dose of study drug (Cycle 1 Day 1) to end of Cycle 2 (1 cycle = 28 days/4 weeks)
|
The highest dose level resulting in 0 or 1 DLT in 6 participants was to be considered the MTD of Phase 1b.
Once the MTD was established, the participant cohort was expanded to a minimum of 10 participants.
The MTD was confirmed by assessing DLTs during Cycle 1 and intolerable toxicities (i.e., not manageable with dose interruption and/or reduction) during Cycle 2 of therapy.
Once the dose of lenvatinib/everolimus combination to be used in the succeeding Phase 2 part of the study was established, enrollment into Phase 2 was started.
The RP2 dose was the same as the confirmed MTD and was used for the Phase 2 Treatment Arm A of this study.
|
First dose of study drug (Cycle 1 Day 1) to end of Cycle 2 (1 cycle = 28 days/4 weeks)
|
|
Phase 2: Progression-Free Survival (PFS)
Time Frame: Date of randomization into Phase 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1) to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), assessed up to data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
PFS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of first dose of study drug to the first documentation of disease progression or death, whichever occurred first.
Kaplan-Meier (K-M) estimates were used to estimate median PFS, presented with 2-sided 95% confidence intervals (CIs).
Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks (or sooner if there was evidence of progressive disease using computed tomography (CT) or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and scan acquisition techniques (including use or nonuse of intravenous (IV) contrast).
Tumor response was determined at the site by the investigator and radiologist using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) 1.1 in the evaluation of the tumor assessment scans.
The date of objective disease progression was defined as the earliest date of radiological disease progression.
Participants removed from therapy due to clinical progression with no radiologic confirmation were censored at their last radiologic assessment date.
|
Date of randomization into Phase 2 (Cycle 1 Day 1) to the date of first documentation of disease progression or death (whichever occurred first), assessed up to data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
Secondary Outcome Measures
Outcome Measure |
Measure Description |
Time Frame |
|---|---|---|
|
Phase 2: Overall Survival (OS)
Time Frame: Randomization (Cycle 1 Day 1) until date of death from any cause, assessed up to the data cutoff date (10 Dec 2014), up to approximately 2 years and 9 months
|
OS was defined as the time (in months) from the date of randomization until date of death from any cause.
Median survival time was calculated using K-M estimate for each treatment arm and presented with 2-sided 95% CIs.
Participants who were lost to follow-up or alive at the data cutoff date (10 Dec 2014) were censored at the date the participants were last known to be alive.
|
Randomization (Cycle 1 Day 1) until date of death from any cause, assessed up to the data cutoff date (10 Dec 2014), up to approximately 2 years and 9 months
|
|
Phase 2: Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Time Frame: Randomization (Cycle 1 Day 1) until first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
The ORR was defined as the percentage of participants who had the best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) as determined by the investigator, using RECIST 1.1 in the evaluation of MRI or CT scans of targeted lesions.
Tumor assessments were performed every 8 weeks (or sooner if there was evidence of progressive disease).
The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of the study treatment until discontinuation from the study.
CR was defined as disappearance of all target lesions.
Any pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) had to have reduction in short axis to less than 10 mm.
PR was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters.
ORR = CR + PR was calculated with exact 95% CIs using the method of Clopper and Pearson.
|
Randomization (Cycle 1 Day 1) until first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
|
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Time Frame: Baseline (Randomization) to first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
The DCR was defined as the percentage of participants who had a BOR of CR or PR or SD (minimum duration from randomization to SD greater than or equal to 7 weeks).
Assessments were performed every 8 weeks and were based on investigator review data using RECIST 1.1.
The 95% CI was constructed using the method of Clopper and Pearson.
DCR = CR + PR + SD greater than or equal to 7 weeks.
|
Baseline (Randomization) to first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
|
Durable Stable Disease (SD) Rate
Time Frame: Baseline (Randomization) to first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
The durable SD rate was defined as the percentage of participants whose BOR was SD and the duration of SD was greater than or equal to 23 weeks.
The durable SD was based on investigator review data using RECIST 1.1.
The 95% CI was constructed using the method of Clopper and Pearson.
|
Baseline (Randomization) to first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
|
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR)
Time Frame: Baseline (Randomization) to first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
The CBR was defined as the percentage of participants who had BOR of CR, PR, or durable SD (duration of SD was greater than or equal to 23 weeks) and was based on investigator review data using RECIST 1.1.
The BOR was defined as the best response recorded from the start of study treatment until discontinuation from the study.
There was no requirement for confirmatory measurement of PR or CR to deem either one the BOR.
The 95% CI was constructed using the method of Clopper and Pearson.
CBR = CR + PR + SD greater than or equal to 23 weeks.
|
Baseline (Randomization) to first evidence of disease progression, assessed up to the data cutoff date (13 Jun 2014), or up to approximately 2 years and 3 months
|
|
Summary of Plasma Concentrations of Lenvatinib for Sparse Pharmacokinetic (PK) Sampling for Phase 1b and Phase 2
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1)
|
Blood samples were collected during the Randomization Phase.
Most participants had 6 samples taken over 3 cycles of treatment (sparse sampling - 2 samples taken per cycle, one at predose and one at 2 to 8 hours postdose).
Plasma concentrations of lenvatinib were measured and concentration data were summarized.
The summary statistics at time points with one or more below the limit of quantitation (BLQ) values were calculated by assigning zero for each BLQ value.
|
Cycle 1 (Day 1), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1)
|
|
Summary of Blood Concentrations of Everolimus for Sparse PK Sampling for Phase 1b and Phase 2
Time Frame: Cycle 1 (Day 1), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1)
|
Blood samples were collected during the Randomization Phase.
Most participants had 6 samples taken over 3 cycles of treatment (sparse sampling - 2 samples taken per cycle, one at predose and one at 2 to 8 hours postdose).
Whole blood concentrations of everolimus were measured and concentration data were summarized.
The summary statistics at time points with one or more BLQ values were calculated by assigning zero for each BLQ value.
|
Cycle 1 (Day 1), Cycle 2 (Day 1), Cycle 3 (Day 1)
|
|
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-Time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours (AUC(0-24)) for Lenvatinib When Administered Alone or in Combination With Everolimus
Time Frame: Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15 immediately predose, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 (optional), and 24 hours postdose (predose on Day 16)
|
Between 9 and 12 participants in each of the 3 treatment arms participated in an optional substudy where instead of the sparse sampling, 9 samples were to be taken over 1 single 24-hour period (i.e., intensive sampling) for full PK profiling.
Blood samples were analyzed for study drug using standardized methods.
PK parameters for lenvatinib were derived from lenvatinib concentration data using non-compartmental methods.
Data were compared via descriptive statistics between single agent and combination therapy.
|
Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15 immediately predose, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 (optional), and 24 hours postdose (predose on Day 16)
|
|
Maximum Concentration (Cmax) of Lenvatinib in Plasma When Administered Alone or in Combination With Everolimus
Time Frame: Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
Cmax for lenvatinib was defined as the maximum observed concentration of lenvatinib in plasma following administration of study treatment on Cycle 1 Day 15 and was obtained directly from the measured plasma concentration-time curves.
|
Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) for Lenvatinib When Administered Alone or in Combination With Everolimus
Time Frame: Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
Tmax for lenvatinib was the amount of time taken after administration of study treatment on Cycle 1 Day 15 to reach maximum concentration (Cmax) of lenvatinib in plasma.
|
Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
|
Area Under the Blood Concentration-Time Curve From 0 to 24 Hours for Everolimus When Administered Alone or in Combination With Lenvatinib
Time Frame: Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15 immediately predose, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 (optional), and 24 hours postdose (predose on Day 16)
|
Between 9 and 12 participants in each of the 3 treatment arms participated in an optional substudy where instead of the sparse sampling, 9 samples were to be taken over 1 single 24-hour period (i.e., intensive sampling) for full PK profiling.
Blood samples were analyzed for study drug using standardized methods.
PK parameters for everolimus were derived from everolimus concentration data using non-compartmental methods.
Data were compared via descriptive statistics between single agent and combination therapy.
|
Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15 immediately predose, and 30 minutes, 1, 2, 3, 4, 8, 12 (optional), and 24 hours postdose (predose on Day 16)
|
|
Maximum Concentration of Everolimus (Cmax) in Blood When Administered Alone or in Combination With Lenvatinib
Time Frame: Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
Cmax for everolimus was defined as the maximum observed concentration of everolimus in blood following administration of study treatment on Cycle 1 Day 15 and was obtained directly from the measured blood concentration-time curves.
|
Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
|
Time to Cmax (Tmax) for Everolimus When Administered Alone or in Combination With Lenvatinib
Time Frame: Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
Tmax for everolimus was the amount of time taken after administration of study treatment on Cycle 1 Day 15 to reach the maximum concentration (Cmax) of everolimus in blood.
|
Phase 2: Cycle 1 Day 15
|
Collaborators and Investigators
This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.
Sponsor
Publications and helpful links
The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.
General Publications
- Lee CH, Motzer RJ, Glen H, Michaelson MD, Larkin J, Minoshima Y, Kanekiyo M, Ikezawa H, Sachdev P, Dutcus CE, Funahashi Y, Voss MH. Correlative serum biomarker analyses in the phase 2 trial of lenvatinib-plus-everolimus in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. Br J Cancer. 2021 Jan;124(1):237-246. doi: 10.1038/s41416-020-01092-0. Epub 2020 Oct 7.
- Motzer RJ, Hutson TE, Glen H, Michaelson MD, Molina A, Eisen T, Jassem J, Zolnierek J, Maroto JP, Mellado B, Melichar B, Tomasek J, Kremer A, Kim HJ, Wood K, Dutcus C, Larkin J. Lenvatinib, everolimus, and the combination in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: a randomised, phase 2, open-label, multicentre trial. Lancet Oncol. 2015 Nov;16(15):1473-1482. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00290-9. Epub 2015 Oct 22. Erratum In: Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jul;17 (7):e270. Lancet Oncol. 2018 Oct;19(10):e509.
Study record dates
These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.
Study Major Dates
Study Start (Actual)
August 5, 2010
Primary Completion (Actual)
June 13, 2014
Study Completion (Actual)
February 8, 2018
Study Registration Dates
First Submitted
May 26, 2010
First Submitted That Met QC Criteria
June 2, 2010
First Posted (Estimate)
June 3, 2010
Study Record Updates
Last Update Posted (Actual)
February 27, 2019
Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria
February 7, 2019
Last Verified
January 1, 2018
More Information
Terms related to this study
Additional Relevant MeSH Terms
- Neoplasms by Histologic Type
- Neoplasms
- Urologic Neoplasms
- Urogenital Neoplasms
- Neoplasms by Site
- Kidney Diseases
- Urologic Diseases
- Adenocarcinoma
- Neoplasms, Glandular and Epithelial
- Kidney Neoplasms
- Carcinoma, Renal Cell
- Carcinoma
- Physiological Effects of Drugs
- Molecular Mechanisms of Pharmacological Action
- Enzyme Inhibitors
- Antineoplastic Agents
- Immunosuppressive Agents
- Immunologic Factors
- Protein Kinase Inhibitors
- Everolimus
- Lenvatinib
Other Study ID Numbers
- E7080-G000-205
This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.
Clinical Trials on Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma
-
NYU Langone HealthNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMetastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaUnited States
-
PfizerRecruitingCarcinoma, Renal Cell | Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Renal Cell Cancer | Renal Cancer | Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma | Renal Neoplasm | Advanced or Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Clear-cell Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Carcinoma, Renal Cell, Advanced and other conditionsUnited States, Japan, Spain, Australia, China
-
Jinling Hospital, ChinaRecruitingMetastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaChina
-
Chinese PLA General HospitalRecruitingUnresectable or Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell CarcinomaChina
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Not yet recruitingMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Stage III Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma and other conditionsUnited States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)Active, not recruitingMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Stage III Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma | Unresectable Renal Cell... and other conditionsUnited States
-
Neomorph, IncRecruitingRenal Cell Carcinoma | Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Kidney Cancer Metastatic | ccRCC | RCC | VHL-Associated Renal Cell Carcinoma | VHL-Associated Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma Metastatic | Kidney CancersUnited States
-
NewLink Genetics CorporationCompletedMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Recurrent Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Kidney Cancer | Refractory Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Clear-cell Renal CancerUnited States
-
Osel, Inc.National Cancer Institute (NCI); City of Hope Medical Center; Miyarisan Pharmaceuticals...RecruitingMetastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma | Metastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Stage III Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Sarcomatoid Renal...United States
-
City of Hope Medical CenterNational Cancer Institute (NCI)RecruitingMetastatic Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Clear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Stage III Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Stage IV Renal Cell Cancer AJCC v8 | Metastatic Sarcomatoid Renal Cell Carcinoma | Advanced Sarcomatoid Renal Cell CarcinomaUnited States
Clinical Trials on Lenvatinib
-
National Cancer Center, KoreaSamsung Medical Center; Asan Medical Center; Seoul National University Hospital; Seoul National University Bundang Hospital and other collaboratorsNot yet recruitingFirst-Line Lenvatinib in Child-Pugh B Patients With HCC Unsuitable for Curative Treatment (FINELAND)Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
-
Asan Medical CenterKorean Cancer Study Group; Boryung Pharmaceutical Co., LtdNot yet recruitingHepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)South Korea
-
CHA UniversityRecruitingHepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)South Korea
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruiting
-
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and...Not yet recruitingHCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
-
Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and...Not yet recruitingHCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma
-
L & L Bio Co., Ltd., Ningbo, ChinaNot yet recruiting
-
Bangladesh Medical UniversityRecruitingUnresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC)Bangladesh
-
Tongji HospitalNot yet recruitingTP53 Gene Mutation | Resistant Cancer | HCC - Hepatocellular Carcinoma | Unresectable
-
Sun Yat-sen UniversityRecruitingClear Cell Renal Cell Carcinoma | Neoadjuvant Therapy | Iparomlimab and TuvonralimabChina