An Observational Study on Long-Term Persistence of Resistant Mutations And Durability of Sustained Virological Response in Patients With Chronic Hepatitis C Treated With Direct Acting Antiviral (DAA)- Containing Regimens

February 12, 2016 updated by: Hoffmann-La Roche

A Long-term Monitoring Study to Evaluate the Persistence of Direct Antiviral (DAA) Treatment Resistant Mutations or the Durability of Sustained Virological Response (SVR) in Patients Treated With DAA Containing Regimens for Chronic Hepatitis C Infections (CHC)

This observational long-term follow-up study will assess the persistence of direct acting antiviral (DAA) resistant mutations and the durability of sustained virological response in patients with chronic hepatitis C who have participated in a Roche DAA treatment protocol. Up to 5 scheduled monitoring visits for blood sampling during an observational period of up to 36 months.

Study Overview

Status

Terminated

Study Type

Observational

Enrollment (Actual)

734

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • New South Wales
      • Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia, 2010
      • Kingswood, New South Wales, Australia, 2747
      • Sydney, New South Wales, Australia, 2050
      • Westmead, New South Wales, Australia, 2145
    • Queensland
      • Greenslopes, Queensland, Australia, 4120
      • Herston, Queensland, Australia, 4029
      • Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia, 4102
    • South Australia
      • Adelaide, South Australia, Australia, 5000
    • Victoria
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3181
      • Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, 3186
      • Wien, Austria, 1080
    • BA
      • Salvador, BA, Brazil, 40210-341
    • RS
      • Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil, 90035-003
    • SP
      • Ribeirao Preto, SP, Brazil, 14049-900
    • Alberta
      • Calgary, Alberta, Canada, T2N 4Z6
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6G 2B7
      • Edmonton, Alberta, Canada, T6L5X8
    • British Columbia
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1M9
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V5Z 1H2
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2K5
      • Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada, V6Z 2C7
      • Victoria, British Columbia, Canada, V8V 3P9
    • Manitoba
      • Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada, R3E 3P4
    • Ontario
      • London, Ontario, Canada, N6A 5A5
      • Ottawa, Ontario, Canada, K1H 8L6
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5T 2S8
      • Toronto, Ontario, Canada, M5G 1L7
    • Quebec
      • Montreal, Quebec, Canada, H3A 1A1
      • Clichy, France, 92118
      • Creteil, France, 94010
      • Lille, France, 59037
      • Marseille, France, 13285
      • Montpellier, France, 34295
      • Montpellier, France, 34094
      • Nice, France, 06202
      • Paris, France, 75651
      • Paris, France, 75679
      • Pessac, France, 33604
      • Rennes, France, 35033
      • Toulouse, France, 31059
      • Vandoeuvre-les-nancy, France, 54511
      • Berlin, Germany, 13353
      • Berlin, Germany, 10969
      • Frankfurt Am Main, Germany, 60590
      • Hamburg, Germany, 20099
      • Hannover, Germany, 30625
      • Muenchen, Germany, 81377
    • Campania
      • Napoli, Campania, Italy, 80131
    • Emilia-Romagna
      • Bologna, Emilia-Romagna, Italy, 40138
    • Lombardia
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20162
      • Milano, Lombardia, Italy, 20121
      • Pavia, Lombardia, Italy, 27100
    • Piemonte
      • Torino, Piemonte, Italy, 10126
    • Puglia
      • Bari, Puglia, Italy, 70124
    • Toscana
      • Pisa, Toscana, Italy, 56124
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44650
      • Guadalajara, Mexico, 44280
      • Monterrey, Mexico, 64710
      • Christchurch, New Zealand, 8011
      • Dunedin, New Zealand, 9016
      • Grafton, New Zealand, 1010
      • Bydgoszcz, Poland, 85-030
      • Chorzow, Poland, 41-500
      • Lodz, Poland, 91-357
      • Myslowice, Poland, 41-400
      • Warszawa, Poland, 01-201
      • Warszawa, Poland, 02-507
      • Wrocław, Poland, 50-349
      • Łodz, Poland, 91-347
      • San Juan, Puerto Rico, 00927
      • Bratislava, Slovakia, 831 01
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08003
      • Barcelona, Spain, 08035
      • Madrid, Spain, 28034
      • Madrid, Spain, 28222
      • Madrid, Spain, 28029
      • Pontevedra, Spain, 36071
      • Sevilla, Spain, 41014
      • Valencia, Spain, 46014
    • Barcelona
      • Badalona, Barcelona, Spain, 08915
    • Cantabria
      • Santander, Cantabria, Spain, 39008
    • Islas Baleares
      • Palma de Mallorca, Islas Baleares, Spain, 07010
    • La Coruña
      • La Coruna, La Coruña, Spain, 15006
    • Tenerife
      • La Laguna, Tenerife, Spain, 38320
      • Dorset, United Kingdom, BH7 7DW
      • Dundee, United Kingdom, DD1 9SY
      • London, United Kingdom, SE5 9RS
      • London, United Kingdom, W2 1NY
      • London, United Kingdom, E1 1BB
      • London, United Kingdom, SW17 0QT
      • Manchester, United Kingdom, M8 5RB
      • Nottingham, United Kingdom, NG7 2UH
    • California
      • La Jolla, California, United States, 92037-1030
      • Long Beach, California, United States, 90822
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95817
      • Sacramento, California, United States, 95825
      • San Diego, California, United States, 92103-8465
      • San Francisco, California, United States, 94115
    • Colorado
      • Aurora, Colorado, United States, 80045
      • Englewood, Colorado, United States, 80113
    • Florida
      • Bradenton, Florida, United States, 34209
    • Georgia
      • Atlanta, Georgia, United States, 30309
      • Decatur, Georgia, United States, 30033
      • Marietta, Georgia, United States, 30060
    • Hawaii
      • Honolulu, Hawaii, United States, 96814
    • Illinois
      • Chicago, Illinois, United States, 60637
    • Indiana
      • Indianapolis, Indiana, United States, 46202
    • Kansas
      • Kansas City, Kansas, United States, 66160-7222
    • Louisiana
      • New Orleans, Louisiana, United States, 70112
    • Michigan
      • Detroit, Michigan, United States, 48202
    • Missouri
      • Kansas City, Missouri, United States, 64131
    • New Hampshire
      • Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States, 03756
    • New Jersey
      • Hillsborough, New Jersey, United States, 08844
      • Newark, New Jersey, United States, 07102
    • New York
      • Manhasset, New York, United States, 11030
      • New York, New York, United States, 10021
      • New York, New York, United States, 10003
    • Rhode Island
      • Providence, Rhode Island, United States, 02905
    • Tennessee
      • Nashville, Tennessee, United States, 37211
    • Texas
      • Dallas, Texas, United States, 75246
      • Houston, Texas, United States, 77030
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78212
      • San Antonio, Texas, United States, 78234
    • Virginia
      • Newport News, Virginia, United States, 23602
      • Richmond, Virginia, United States, 23249
    • Washington
      • Vancouver, Washington, United States, 98604

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

18 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Sampling Method

Probability Sample

Study Population

Chronic hepatitis C patients having received direct acting antiviral treatment in donor protocol

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • adult patients, >/=18 years of age
  • chronic hepatitis C
  • participation in Roche DAA treatment protocol for CHC infection
  • DAA-associated resistant mutations persisting through to last evaluation in donor protocol , or partial viral response or viral load rebound while on RO5024048 treatment, or sustained virological response >/= 20 weeks after last dose of study medication in donor study

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For patients participating in DAA resistance monitoring: Initiation of treatment after participation in the donor protocol for which there is evidence of cross-resistance to donor protocol DAA
  • For patients participating in DAA SVR durability: Treatment with any anti-HVC therapy since establishing SVR in the donor study

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

Cohorts and Interventions

Group / Cohort
Cohort

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV Ribonucleic Acid (RNA) Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 International Units per milliliter [IU/mL]).
Month 3
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 9
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Time Frame: Month 18
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 18
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 3
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 9
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
HCV RNA Levels in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Time Frame: Month 18
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 18
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure (units: millimeters of Mercury [Hg] [mmHg]) were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 3
Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 9
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Time Frame: Month 18
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 18
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 3
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 9
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Time Frame: Month 18
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 18
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 3
Time Frame: Month 3
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 3
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 9
Time Frame: Month 9
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 9
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Pulse Rate in Resistance Monitoring Arm at Month 18
Time Frame: Month 18
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 18
Percentage of Participants Who Received Anti-HCV Medications in Resistance Monitoring Arm
Time Frame: Up to 18 months
Percentage of participants who received any anti-HCV medication during the monitoring period was reported.
Up to 18 months
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 24
Percentage of Participants With the Detectable HCV RNA Results in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 36
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 6
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 12
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 24
Mean HCV RNA Levels in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
Serum HCV RNA concentration was determined using the Roche COBAS TaqMan HCV Test (Detection limit = 15 IU/mL).
Month 36
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 24
Mean Systolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
Any abnormalities in systolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 36
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 24
Mean Diastolic Blood Pressure in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
Any abnormalities in diastolic blood pressure were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 36
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 6
Time Frame: Month 6
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 6
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 12
Time Frame: Month 12
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 12
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 24
Time Frame: Month 24
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 24
Mean Pulse Rate in SVR Durability Monitoring Arm at Month 36
Time Frame: Month 36
Any abnormalities in pulse rate were reported at the discretion of principal investigator.
Month 36
Number of Participants With Danoprevir (DNV) Resistance Status-Population Sequencing
Time Frame: Month 3-18

Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of DNV resistance or without loss of DNV resistance.

Results are reported as per donor protocol. Category 1: Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 99 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis.

Category 2: Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 33 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis.

Category 3: Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 30 participants with no DNV resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing enrolled in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Month 3-18
Number of Participants With DNV Resistance Status-Clonal Sequencing
Time Frame: Month 3-18

Clonal sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of DNV resistance or without loss of DNV resistance.

Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 64 participants with loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Category 2-Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 35 participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 26 participants who had no DNV resistance at the end of donor study were analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688. Three participants from donor studies WV21913, NP28266 and NP27946, respectively were not analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688 as loss of resistance mutations was demonstrated by clonal sequencing in donor study.

Month 3-18
Number of Participants With Boceprevir (BOC) or Telaprevir (TVR) Resistance Status-Population Sequencing
Time Frame: Month 3-18

Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of BOC or TVR resistance or without loss of BOC or TVR resistance.

Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 6 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis.

Category 2-Number of participants with no loss resistance in NV22688. One participant with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing was included in this analysis.

Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 2 participants with no BOC or TVR resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing enrolled in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Month 3-18
Number of Participants With BOC or TVR Resistance Status-Clonal Sequencing
Time Frame: Month 3-18

Clonal sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of BOC or TVR resistance or without loss of BOC or TVR resistance.

Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 3 participants with loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Category 2-Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 3 participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 2 participants who had no resistance at the end of donor study were analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688.

Month 3-18
Number of Participants With Setrobuvir (STV) Resistance Status-Population Sequencing
Time Frame: Month 3-18

Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of STV resistance or without loss of STV resistance.

Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 5 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis.

Category 2-Number of participants with no loss resistance in NV22688. A total of 3 participants with resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing were included in this analysis.

Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. A total of 3 participants with no STV resistance at the end of donor study by population sequencing enrolled in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Month 3-18
Number of Participants With STV Resistance Status-Clonal Sequencing
Time Frame: Month 3-18

Clonal sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Resistance status was reported as either with loss of STV resistance or without loss of STV resistance.

Category 1-Number of participants with loss of resistance in NV22688. One participant with loss of resistance in NV22688 was included in this analysis.

Category 2-Number of participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688. A total of 4 participants with no loss of resistance in NV22688 were included in this analysis.

Category 3-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. One participant with loss of resistance, analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688.

Category 4-Number of participants with loss of resistance in donor study. Two participants with no loss of resistance, analyzed by clonal sequencing in NV22688.

Month 3-18
Number of Participants Who Had Received Mericitabine (MCB)-Based Regimen and Enrolled in NV22688
Time Frame: Month 18
Population sequencing was used for determination of loss of resistance status. Results are reported as per donor protocol.
Month 18

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Completion (Actual)

April 1, 2015

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

July 15, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

July 22, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

July 23, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

March 11, 2016

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 12, 2016

Last Verified

February 1, 2016

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Hepatitis C, Chronic

Subscribe