Confronting Unequal Eye Care in Pennsylvania

April 6, 2017 updated by: Julia Haller, Wills Eye

Pt. 1 Diabetic retinopathy is a common eye condition among diabetic adults and can lead to severe vision impairment and even blindness. African Americans are more likely to have vision loss from diabetic retinopathy due to a variety of factors, including cultural barriers to care. The investigators aim to increase the rates of eye exams in diabetic African American adults by providing culturally relevant home-based interventions. These interventions will increase the knowledge about diabetes and the eyes and the awareness of ocular risks due to diabetes.

206 African American adults, over the age of 65, with diabetes will be recruited from primary care clinics at Thomas Jefferson and Temple University. Eligible patients who consent to participate will have baseline information taken about medical and ocular history, understanding of diabetes and a hemoglobin A1C level obtained. The subjects will then be randomized to one of two treatment conditions: Behavioral Activation or Supportive Therapy, each of which will be delivered over 4 sessions. Behavioral Activation will consist of educational materials, referral assistance for eye clinics, and addressing patient specific barriers to care. Supportive Therapy will consist of supportive but non-directional interaction with the patient exploring the impact of aging and diabetes on the patient's life. The investigators hypothesize that more patients who receive Behavioral Activation will have a dilated fundus exam (the primary outcome variable), understand the risks of diabetic complications and feel less depression then subjects who receive Supportive Therapy.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

An additional aim was added to this project, examining the effect of a telephone intervention on eye care adherence and comparing the efficacy of the intervention to usual care and automated telephone screenings.

Glaucoma is a group of chronic, neurodegenerative diseases of the optic nerve, which leads to an increase in intraocular pressure, gradual changes in the visual field (VF), and progressive vision loss. Glaucomatous vision loss is preventable with proper eye care, including adherence to follow-up appointments and medications. Interventions that improve appointment adherence have the potential to prevent more severe glaucomatous disease. The primary purpose of this study is to determine the efficacy of a multifaceted intervention system, which includes a customized letter and personal telephone outreach, in improving appointment adherence in patients with glaucoma. In order to improve strategies to reduce the rate of appointment non-adherence, shared characteristics of adherent versus non-adherent patients with glaucoma will be identified and compared to patient characteristics in the previous literature. A secondary goal of this study is to analyze the cost-effectiveness of this multifaceted intervention on appointment adherence in patients with glaucoma.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

206

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • Pennsylvania
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Thomas Jefferson University
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19140
        • Temple University
      • Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States, 19107
        • Wills Eye Health System

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

21 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Pt. 1

Inclusion Criteria:

  • African-American race (self-identified)
  • Age ≥ 65 years
  • Type II Diabetes Mellitus (physician diagnosis) for at least 1 year
  • No medical documentation of a DFE by an ophthalmologist or an optometrist within the past 12 months
  • Self-report of no DFE within the past 12 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Cognitive Impairment (Mini-Mental Status Examination ≤ 24)
  • Current clinically significant psychiatric disorder other than depression
  • Current medical disorder that limits life expectancy (≤ 12 months) or need for dialysis
  • Hearing impairment that precludes research participation

Pt. 2

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Glaucoma (physician diagnosis)
  • Scheduled for a follow-up appointment that meets the American Academy of Ophthalmology (AAO) follow-up guidelines
  • Attended the Wills Eye Glaucoma Clinic from September 1, 2012 to October 31, 2013
  • Age ≥ 21 years old
  • Able to understand and speak English

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Diagnosed with a pre-existing medical condition that would preclude the subject from providing reliable and valid data
  • Individual was asked to follow-up in less than a month.

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Prevention
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Pt. 1 Behavioral Activation
Behavioral Activation (BA) is a behavioral technique to help people overcome avoidant tendencies through goal setting, activity scheduling, and graded task assignment. The key component of BA involves developing an "Action Plan", and having the subject document each step of the plan as he or she implements it, reinforcing the steps towards goal attainment. "Action Plans" are easily applied to diabetes self-care tasks because the latter lend themselves to documentation of simple, step-by-step plans. In this study, a Community Health Educator (CHE) - interventionist will schedule and deliver four 45-60 minute in-home BA sessions within 3 months of randomization (i.e., one session every 2-3 weeks).
Baseline assessment plus 4 in-home problem solving therapy sessions.
Other Names:
  • BA - abbreviation
Placebo Comparator: Pt. 1 Supportive Therapy
The purpose of Supportive Therapy (ST) is to explore the impact of aging and diabetes on the subject's life. In contrast to the BA intervention, the interventionist does not discuss the importance of dilated eye exams. In subsequent sessions, ST facilitates and deepens knowledge about the subject's life situation in relation to his or her health and other life difficulties. The ST therapist encourages this process and creates an accepting, nondirective, and supportive opportunity for discussion.
Baseline assessment plus 4 in-home sessions of supportive therapy.
Other Names:
  • ST-abbreviation

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pt. 1 Dilated Fundus Exam (DFE)
Time Frame: 6-month follow-up assessment
At the 6-month follow-up assessment, patients will be asked if they got a dilated fundus exam since the baseline assessment. If a DFE is self-reported, it will be confirmed by ophthalmology chart review
6-month follow-up assessment

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pt. 1 Risk perceptions of diabetes
Time Frame: 6-month follow up assessment

Risk Perception Survey-Diabetes Mellitus (RPS-DM) has 5 subscales:

1) Personal Control, 2) Optimistic Bias, 3) Personal Disease Risk, 4) Comparative Environmental Risk, 5) Risk Knowledge

6-month follow up assessment
Pt. 1 Diabetes self-care behaviors
Time Frame: 6-month follow up assessment
Yields a global scale that summarizes self-care behaviors
6-month follow up assessment
Pt. 1 Depressive Symptoms
Time Frame: 6-month follow up assessment
Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9)
6-month follow up assessment
Pt. 2 Appointment Adherence Characteristics
Time Frame: Dependent on Diagnosis
To assess the relationship between appointment adherence and particular demographic characteristics, clinical factors, and systems-level variables.
Dependent on Diagnosis

Other Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Pt. 2 Cost-effectiveness
Time Frame: Conclusion of Study
To determine which aspects of the intervention are most costly, and whether these aspects can be delivered more efficiently in order to promote broader translation.
Conclusion of Study

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Julia Haller, MD, Wills Eye
  • Study Director: Lisa Hark, PhD, RD, Wills Eye

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2010

Primary Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Completion (Actual)

May 1, 2014

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 10, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 10, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 11, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

April 10, 2017

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

April 6, 2017

Last Verified

April 1, 2017

More Information

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Glaucoma

Clinical Trials on Behavioral Activation

Subscribe