Virtual Reality Behavioral Activation: An Intervention for Major Depressive Disorder

May 8, 2021 updated by: Margot Paul, Stanford University
The primary purpose of this study is to test the safety and feasibility of virtual reality (VR) technology in the use of behavioral activation (BA) as a treatment for major depressive disorder (MDD). The secondary purpose of this study is to examine whether any evidence of clinical efficacy exists for VR delivered BA.

Study Overview

Detailed Description

This is a treatment development trial. Participants will be randomly assigned to BA in VR, BA in real-life, or a waitlist control group. The former two groups will follow a BA protocol developed for primary care settings over a four-week treatment period. This study is taking place over Zoom, due to COVID-19.

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

20

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

    • California
      • Palo Alto, California, United States, 94304
        • Stanford University

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

14 years and older (Adult, Older Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient must meet DSM V criteria for MDD
  • Patient must be at least 18 years of age
  • Patient must be English speaking

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Substance Use Disorders in past year
  • Any psychosis or bipolar I disorder
  • Any seizure in the last 6 months or untreated epilepsy
  • Current nonsuicidal self-injury or parasuicidal behavior
  • Current suicidal urges and intent

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: None (Open Label)

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Experimental: Virtual Reality Behavioral Activation
Participants randomized to this arm will perform all of their behavioral activation in virtual reality. Participants will meet with the clinician once a week for three weeks (4 sessions). In between weekly therapy sessions, participants will pick four pleasurable activities to enjoy in virtual reality.
Participants will choose four "activities" to complete in virtual reality over the course of the week. These activities are video 360 and range from viewing animals, to viewing nature scenes, to traveling to a different location in the world, to viewing adrenaline-pumping activities.
Active Comparator: Behavioral Activation in real-life
Participants randomized to this arm will perform all of their behavioral activation in real life. Participants will meet with the clinician once a week for three weeks (4 sessions). In between weekly therapy sessions, participants will pick four pleasurable or mastery activities to perform in real life.
Participants will choose four pleasurable and/or mastery activities to complete over the course of the week in real life.
No Intervention: Waitlist Control
Participants randomized to this arm will not receive any type of intervention and will be asked to complete the PHQ-9 once a week for three weeks (4 sessions) to track symptoms. Participants will be offered to engage in behavioral activation in real life or with virtual reality when the four weeks are complete. Their data will only be used from the time they were on the waitlist.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Number of Participants Who Dropped Out of Each Study Arm
Time Frame: 3-weeks
Participant treatment dropout was compared across each study arm. This was reported as the count of participants who discontinued the study for any reason.
3-weeks
Participant's Desire to Continue Using VR After the Study Ends
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
This outcome was measured using the "Intention to use Technology " questions of the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire. These are questions 11, 12, and 13 and allow participants the option of circling Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), or Strongly Agree (4). With 3 questions, the total range was 0-12 (higher scores indicate greater acceptance).
Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
Participant's Satisfaction With the VR-BA Treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
This outcome was measured using the "Attitudes Toward Use " questions of the Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire. These are questions 7, 8, 9, and 10 and allow participants the option of circling Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), or Strongly Agree (4). With 4 questions, the total range was 0-16 (higher scores indicate greater acceptance).
Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
Participant's Use of the VR Headset
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
This was measured by noting the amount of times the VR headset is used during the 3-week study period.
Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
Participant's Acceptance of VR-BA Treatment
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
This was measured using the overall Technology Acceptance Model questionnaire, which encompasses 13 questions and allows participants the option of circling Strongly Disagree (0), Disagree (1), Neutral (2), Agree (3), or Strongly Agree (4), yielding a range of 0-52 (higher scores indicate greater acceptance).
Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
How Well Can Participants Tolerate the VR-BA Treatment?
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
This was determined by the Simulator Sickness Questionnaire, which names 16 adverse symptoms and asks participants to circle as compared to baseline: No more than usual (0), Slightly more than usual (1), Moderately more than usual (2), or Severely more than usual (3), yielding a range of 0-48 (lower scores indicate greater tolerability).
Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
How Present Did Individuals in the VR-BA Treatment Feel?
Time Frame: Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4
This was measured using the Presence Questionnaire, which asks three questions and asks the participants to circle either Not at all (0), Slightly (1), Moderately (2), Strongly (3), or Very Strongly (4), yielding a range of 0-12 (higher scores indicate greater presence).
Assessed at the end of week 3, after session 4

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
Change in Depression Scores on the PHQ-9 From Baseline to Session 4, Compared Across Three Study Arms
Time Frame: Assessed at baseline and session 4.
How participants' depression scores on the Patient Health Questionnaire (PHQ-9) change over time using VR-BA compared to BA in real life and a waitlist control. The PHQ-9 is a 9-question screener with a score range of 0-29, with 29 indicating the most severe depression and 0 indicating a lack of depression symptoms. The greater the change over time, the greater the symptom reduction.
Assessed at baseline and session 4.

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Study Director: Kim Bullock, MD, Stanford University
  • Principal Investigator: Margot Paul, MS, Stanford University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start (Actual)

May 18, 2020

Primary Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Completion (Actual)

January 15, 2021

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

February 5, 2020

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

February 11, 2020

First Posted (Actual)

February 13, 2020

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Actual)

June 2, 2021

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

May 8, 2021

Last Verified

May 1, 2021

More Information

Terms related to this study

Plan for Individual participant data (IPD)

Plan to Share Individual Participant Data (IPD)?

No

IPD Plan Description

No current plan to share data.

Drug and device information, study documents

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated drug product

No

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated device product

Yes

product manufactured in and exported from the U.S.

Yes

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Depression

Clinical Trials on Virtual Reality Behavioral Activation

Subscribe