Effects of Motivational Interviewing in Prison

August 18, 2010 updated by: Karolinska Institutet

Motivational Interviewing Delivered by Existing Prison Staff: A Randomized Controlled Study of Effectiveness on Substance Use After Release

Motivational Interviewing (MI) is a communication style demonstrated to decrease drug and alcohol use. A five session MI intervention (BSF) was implemented in the Swedish correctional system. The intervention was delivered by counsellors with workshop only MI training (BSF) or by counsellors with workshop MI training followed by peer group supervision based on audio taped feedback (BSF+).

Aim was to examine whether BSF in prisons reduces drug and alcohol use more effectively than interviews conducted according to the usual planning interview routine (UPI).

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

296

Phase

  • Phase 3

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

      • Stockholm, Sweden, S-171 76
        • Karolinska Institutet, Dep Clin Neuroscience

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

20 years to 50 years (Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Genders Eligible for Study

Male

Description

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Born between 01-01-1954 and 31-12-1984;
  • Conditional release no later than 30-06-2005 (this was extended to 19-09-2005 and again to 31-03-2006);
  • Swedish or Norwegian speaker;
  • Not having previously received BSF in remand or any other prison;
  • Heavy use of alcohol or drugs, measured by the standard prison and probation system: 1= occasional use; 2= heavy use;
  • ASI interview at intake;
  • No order for deportation after release from prison

Exclusion Criteria:

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Randomized
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
Active Comparator: (BSF) MI sessions
5 semi-structured manualised MI sessions was conducted by existing prison staff having undergone 3 days of Motivational Interviewing workshop training and 2 days of training with the BSF manual.
MI is a communication style defined as a collaborative, person-centred form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation to change. The method is based on four principles: showing empathy; developing discrepancy between the subject's current behaviour and an alternate, more desired, behaviour; reinforcing self-efficacy; and "rolling" with resistance to change. Client arguments for change are elicited and reinforced in an atmosphere that is empathic, collaborative and supportive of autonomy. The choice to change and the responsibility for change remain with the client.
Active Comparator: (BSF+) MI sessions with supervision
5 semi-structured manualised MI sessions was conducted by ordinary prison staff having undergone 3 days of Motivational Interviewing workshop training and 2 days of training with the BSF manual, followed by ongoing Motivational Interviewing training with feedback based on audio taped sessions in peer supervision groups.
MI is a communication style defined as a collaborative, person-centred form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation to change. The method is based on four principles: showing empathy; developing discrepancy between the subject's current behaviour and an alternate, more desired, behaviour; reinforcing self-efficacy; and "rolling" with resistance to change. Client arguments for change are elicited and reinforced in an atmosphere that is empathic, collaborative and supportive of autonomy. The choice to change and the responsibility for change remain with the client.
Active Comparator: (UPI) Usual Planning Interview
5 sessions was conducted by prison staff according to usual working practices, with the exception that content was structured into 5 sessions and audio recorded. The provision of a government decree served as a basis for the intervention, covering planning of prison activities and post release arrangements including strategies for drug use cessation.
MI is a communication style defined as a collaborative, person-centred form of guiding to elicit and strengthen motivation to change. The method is based on four principles: showing empathy; developing discrepancy between the subject's current behaviour and an alternate, more desired, behaviour; reinforcing self-efficacy; and "rolling" with resistance to change. Client arguments for change are elicited and reinforced in an atmosphere that is empathic, collaborative and supportive of autonomy. The choice to change and the responsibility for change remain with the client.

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
number of days with substance use
Time Frame: of the last 30 days
alcohol- or drug use as measured by the Addiction Severity Index (ASI) at intake and at 10 months after release
of the last 30 days

Secondary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
Measure Description
Time Frame
reported days of illegal activity
Time Frame: during the preceding 30 days
as measured by Addiction Severity Index at intake and 10 months after release
during the preceding 30 days
number of days working
Time Frame: during the last 30 days
as measured by the Addiction Severity Index at intake and 10 months after release
during the last 30 days

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Investigators

  • Principal Investigator: Lars G Forsberg, Ph D, Karolinska Institutet

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

April 1, 2004

Primary Completion (Actual)

March 1, 2007

Study Completion (Actual)

July 1, 2008

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

August 18, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

August 19, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

August 18, 2010

Last Verified

October 1, 2003

More Information

Terms related to this study

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on Alcohol Abuse

Clinical Trials on Motivational Interviewing; MI

Subscribe