Segment Transport Versus Acute Shortening In The Treatment of Tibial Pseudarthroses With Bone Loss

November 23, 2010 updated by: Bezmialem Vakif University
In this study the investigators are presenting the advantages as well as the disadvantages of ACUTE SHORTENING AND RELENGTHENINIG VS SEGMENT TRANSPORT methods.

Study Overview

Status

Completed

Conditions

Intervention / Treatment

Study Type

Interventional

Enrollment (Actual)

22

Phase

  • Not Applicable

Contacts and Locations

This section provides the contact details for those conducting the study, and information on where this study is being conducted.

Study Locations

  • Turkey
      • Istanbul, Turkey, 34290
        • Cengiz Sen

Participation Criteria

Researchers look for people who fit a certain description, called eligibility criteria. Some examples of these criteria are a person's general health condition or prior treatments.

Eligibility Criteria

Ages Eligible for Study

13 years to 50 years (Child, Adult)

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

N/A

Genders Eligible for Study

All

Description

Inclusion Criteria:TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES -

Exclusion Criteria:BONE LOSS GREATER THAN 10 CM

-

Study Plan

This section provides details of the study plan, including how the study is designed and what the study is measuring.

How is the study designed?

Design Details

  • Primary Purpose: Treatment
  • Allocation: Non-Randomized
  • Interventional Model: Parallel Assignment
  • Masking: Single

Arms and Interventions

Participant Group / Arm
Intervention / Treatment
No Intervention: COMPLICATION
Other: ASR METHOD

What is the study measuring?

Primary Outcome Measures

Outcome Measure
TREATMENT PERIOD AND COMPLICATION RATE

Collaborators and Investigators

This is where you will find people and organizations involved with this study.

Sponsor

Bezmialem Vakif University

Publications and helpful links

The person responsible for entering information about the study voluntarily provides these publications. These may be about anything related to the study.

General Publications

  • Paley D, Sen C, Tetsworth K. Acute Shortening With Subsequent Relengthening Versus Bone Transport In The Treatment Of Tibial Bone Defect, 11th Asami North America Annual Scientific Meeting, February 18-25, Berkeley Ca, 2001

Study record dates

These dates track the progress of study record and summary results submissions to ClinicalTrials.gov. Study records and reported results are reviewed by the National Library of Medicine (NLM) to make sure they meet specific quality control standards before being posted on the public website.

Study Major Dates

Study Start

October 1, 2009

Primary Completion (Actual)

December 1, 2009

Study Completion (Actual)

February 1, 2010

Study Registration Dates

First Submitted

November 23, 2010

First Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2010

First Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2010

Study Record Updates

Last Update Posted (Estimate)

November 24, 2010

Last Update Submitted That Met QC Criteria

November 23, 2010

Last Verified

November 1, 2010

More Information

Terms related to this study

Additional Relevant MeSH Terms

Other Study ID Numbers

  • BVUORT001

This information was retrieved directly from the website clinicaltrials.gov without any changes. If you have any requests to change, remove or update your study details, please contact register@clinicaltrials.gov. As soon as a change is implemented on clinicaltrials.gov, this will be updated automatically on our website as well.

Clinical Trials on TIBIA PSEUDOARTHROSES

Clinical Trials on ASR METHOD

Search Similar Trials

Sponsors and Collaborators

Medical Conditions

Drug Interventions

CROs by country

CROs in Turkmenistan

Conditions

Rare Diseases

Drug Interventions

Dietary Supplements

Sponsor/Collaborators

Locations

3
Subscribe